This is again a asinine case and I'm beginning to think you might be scum or disgustingly biased.In post 513, Luca Blight wrote:And now Churros has gone from this:
...to this:In post 466, Churros wrote: Norwe compromissing on Anotora it's also a bit puzzling. It's not like Una/Profi are really impossible, and Anotora wagon has no resistance like you said,It simply had not been in the spotlight.even if I SR her.
And no-one else has posted in the time between these two posts.In post 476, Churros wrote:I feel indecisive on who to vote here
Four options. Too many for day 1.
I want to engage Una but it's too late for that at the moment.
I'll leave with
VOTE: Anotora
It feels like a perspective slip of sorts; he forgets the opinion he had before, because it was fabricated. This can happen from town, but Churros posted all this in quick succession. It doesn’t make sense how he could shade NorwegianboyEE for wagoing Anotora because there’s no resistance, and the proceed to do so himself a few posts later, without it being disingenuous.
You say I'm shading Norwegian for wagoning Anotora when in truth I just said I don't follow why people backed down on Una/Profi so easily.
As a courtesy to your blindness, I highlighted the part on which I do agree with the scum reads on Anotora, which means nothing changed and there is no inconsistency.
It's the second time you put words into my mouth and try to make stretchy reasoning to call me scum. Both of your posts take a issue with something that I never did or happened.