In post 1232, Shuichi Saihara wrote:1. I would rate that as pretty close to a strawman.
2. Yes, you clearly at best were expecting wrong.
3a. I assume that you are reading gobble as very town based on in thread material, yes. At no point have I suggested you were saying your opinions line up with those of gobbles. I have not checked to see if they do. I am interpreting this as similar to you saying gobbles is confirmed town so you'll follow him. Again I'll cite my original post saying you shouldn't need to sheep a townread while being a three headed hydra.
3-bolded. Yeah... no shit... that's why it's a weird thing for you to say you want to sheep someone when you already have reads, since that is a thing people who don't feel good about their reads do...
1. It isn't - if you're assuming the bolded there was "lulzy" then context makes the "I'll sheep!" part also likely lulzy.
2. Yes... clearly.
3a. Sure, but I was talking about Gobble's argument - the whole "established vs potential" stuff was a reply to his line of attack, which you questioned, which I answered. And to your repeated citation I'll cite this whole series of posts of mine, naturally
3. Exactly... such a weird thing to say... and the context around it is clearly memey... so...
Anyway, I'm cutting engagement about this at this point, sorry - either vote me if you think I'm scum who "messed up" and am post-hoc justifying that (lol) or move on.