In post 464, Alisae wrote:this is actually the one film I haven't seen yet tbh.In post 460, Enter wrote:Do you at least like inglorious bastards?
pedit: You gonna bark all day or are you gonna bite
In post 474, Enter wrote:Also I would bite you but I'm not sure how, srry
Once Upon a Time in Hollywood wasn't for meIn post 473, Enter wrote:Quentin Tarantino is a pretty good director in general, IMO
Agreed.In post 477, Alisae wrote:Once Upon a Time in Hollywood wasn't for meIn post 473, Enter wrote:Quentin Tarantino is a pretty good director in general, IMO
i don't exactly remember hateful 8 as wellIn post 478, Enter wrote:Agreed.In post 477, Alisae wrote:Once Upon a Time in Hollywood wasn't for meIn post 473, Enter wrote:Quentin Tarantino is a pretty good director in general, IMO
Hateful 8 also felt like a bit of a waste of my time
I already explained my reasoning for switching to Bulbazak - the consensus is that Mastina isn't getting the boot today, but is also pretty harmless for now. So long as Town holds the line about not handing her the win, she's less important unless she has access to a kill. Bulbazak on the other hand, is actively pushing bad logic reads. It's still early game, so that's about all I really need right now.In post 444, Taly wrote:im not convinced onbulborariscum. :/
i wantbulb/pine/maria/alito reply before i think much further
You take my pagetop and now you want my vote as well...In post 476, Enter wrote:Oh wow a pagetop. Penguinpower must now surrender his vote to me
Take that backIn post 486, Alisae wrote:god why does Sherlock look so ugly dude
It'd be more accurate to say "boy who cried sheep but the townsfolk kept on saying he said wolf syndrome".In post 309, Enter wrote:this feels like the posts of someone suffering from "boy who cried wolf syndrome"
Taly gets it.In post 420, Taly wrote: The principle to lynchingmastinais that she's not town, and I genuinely see no reason whymastinaclaims this if she's not 3p - becausehave incentive and an excuse to lynch her now... and this can't be faithfully written off as atown and scum"safe bus"for scum to make because the 3p claim is invalidated upon her lynch.
Well to be blunt.In post 327, Enter wrote:I don't think there's any excitement in just asking everyone to do the one thing that wins her the game. I think that if it were as easy and simple as she says it is, she would enjoy a little resistance and seek to spend the game trying to lure people into achieving her wincon. I don't think she gets much enjoyment out of everyone immediately agreeing to do what she wants.
This, too.In post 329, Bulbazak wrote:If she's getting ran up for stupid reasons, it's very easy to see why she would get frustrated, especially when there are players on that wagon that should know better. There was scum on that wagon. Mastina thinks 1. I think 2. If you don't want Pine, then sell me on one of the other 3, but that's where my vote is going today.
Indeed. You wouldn't believe the reactions I've had as town, unless you've seen them.In post 334, Bulbazak wrote:I've seen her get that worked up over her claim before and not be scum. That's a mastina reaction.
In post 254, Bulbazak wrote:It's too easy. Mastina's claim is easily provable, and it doesn't cost town anything to play along. Scum can blend in, and it makes them look like they're doing something without actually scumhunting. And my questions to Alisae has a point to them and points to the problem with the wagon: No one could give a good reason why scum Mastin would make that claim.In post 246, Dunnstral wrote:Explain how there is scum in there. What's wrong with voting the third party claim?
Don't know why I'm listed as not voting Pine since I did vote him.
Like a drug.
Pretty much this yeah.In post 353, Bulbazak wrote:@Enter: You still have yet to give a reason why masturbating would be bad.
p-edit: This neutral 3rd party fear has always been bull crap. Most players with a neutral 3rd party still have a town bent, which means they are more likely to help town than scum if given the choice. Lynching them wastes a lynch and ignores any help they can give. They are an easy wagon for scum to push and hide on. If you want to vig them, fine, but if the objective is easily obtainable and does not go against our wincon, there's no point wasting time trying to kill them.
Works in theory until you realize my wording was as close as a direct quote of my role PM as I can get without being modkilled, soooooooo.In post 368, Enter wrote:In post 53, mastina wrote:Hi guys.
I'm a third party whose wincon is to have everyone who is town in the game masturbate. This, very explicitly, willend the game, the game will continue after I achieve my wincon, but like. I'm just here to get a good fuck, I'll help the town in exchange for them giving my win in any way that I can but like. I'm not gonna lie, bluntly, I've got one goal in this game and that's to get y'all to masturbate.not
