This is a game in which Town must step up, for we are under the cosh!In post 32, Raya36 wrote:Also I feel like this would be a game where scum would have the confidence to try to take a town leading role
My dear fellow, you misread my post!In post 44, Emperor flippyNips wrote:
i was tired and just wanted the first post. didn't really care to choose someone to fake murder at the time
You're casting a shadow upon me in a most disingenuous way. You apparently have no reason to assume Elmo is Town, and yet I am scummy for not jumping to the same assumption? What exactly did I say to provoke this opinion?In post 62, NDMath wrote:When I assume Elmo is town, you look really bad. I have no reason to assume Elmo is town yet though.In post 25, Solon wrote:Solon/Elmo is likely T/S (in some order) says you, yet you proceed to place a seemingly random vote on Tanner?
Explain yourself at once!
Phrasing-wise I was struggling since stating an interaction looks T/S always has scum motivation.
I voted because I get scumread for not voting. I wasn't a fan of the emperor rvs wagon.
1) How is it misrepping, from the point of view that I don't know Elmo's alignment? Is it fact that she was manipulating the masses? No. Is it a possibility? Absolutely!In post 70, NDMath wrote:1. I sure hope you don't actually think that that's my reason. When I assume Elmo is town the push in 22 looks absurd and "manipulate the masses" is misrepping the situation greatly.In post 63, Tanner wrote:In post 62, NDMath wrote:When I assume Elmo is town, you look really bad. I have no reason to assume Elmo is town yet though.In post 25, Solon wrote:Solon/Elmo is likely T/S (in some order) says you, yet you proceed to place a seemingly random vote on Tanner?
Explain yourself at once!
Phrasing-wise I was struggling since stating an interaction looks T/S always has scum motivation.
I voted because I get scumread for not voting. I wasn't a fan of the emperor rvs wagon.1.Why does town!Elmo -> scum!Solon, because Solon voted her?2.Even though you yourself have no reason to assume she's Town?
3.Why would stating that always have scum motivation?4.Why so worried about appearances?
2. I said that based off the premise of Elmo being town, I don't understand your question here?
3. Declaring a T/S interaction as scum on two townies means you can hang either then try to get the other the next day.
4. I basically always am. I get mishung quite a bit and am still trying to fix that.
I'm starting to warm to you. Something about your tone feels pure!In post 78, Elmo TeH AzN wrote:I'm going to for transparency. If you must know. I saw the post and saw "town is screwed" I wondered why there was only one kill and as I was writing the post I scrolled down and saw there were two. Then I had the "OH Shit!" Moment.
I'm glad if anything that post provoked conversation.
What was on your mind?In post 98, Knightmare491 wrote:Oh. GotchaIn post 94, Raya36 wrote:Because 2 of the power roles were killed Night 0. I think that's a solid confidence boost
I had something else on my mind.
Definitely agree we should step up and that's a good point too. I guess it just comes down to playstyle.In post 100, Solon wrote:This is a game in which Town must step up, for we are under the cosh!In post 32, Raya36 wrote:Also I feel like this would be a game where scum would have the confidence to try to take a town leading role
Scum are sitting pretty right now and probably smiling contentedly to themselves after the success of their N0 actions - they are unlikely to be showing much urgency, but rather complacency!
@MathIn post 39, alban wrote:In post 24, NDMath wrote:I suppose everyone can safely soft vigilante now.
The Elmo/Solon interaction has heavy potential to be T/S in some order.
I've already got a slight townread on Dunnstral.
VOTE: Tanner
Elaborate, please.
Each statement reads peculiar.
I thought you made that conclusion based on the fact that we have a vig and an SK, who'll both try to kill mafia and I wouldn't expect them to kill town leaders, not early game at least. I thought you were thinking along those lines.In post 106, Raya36 wrote:What was on your mind?
An answer to 59 is in 60. If you don't see what I'm doing, that's none of my fault.In post 96, Emperor flippyNips wrote:@tanner–You answered nothing
Yes but the SK could also be trying to take that top town read....In post 107, Knightmare491 wrote:I thought you made that conclusion based on the fact that we have a vig and an SK, who'll both try to kill mafia and I wouldn't expect them to kill town leaders, not early game at least. I thought you were thinking along those lines.In post 106, Raya36 wrote:What was on your mind?
If everyone did this, nothing would ever be said.In post 97, MariaR wrote:It’s strange I have nothing that makes me want to comment on at the moment. I could ask some random questions but with no real goal behind them that just feels odd to me. I suppose I’m waiting is the best way to put it
Are you a meme account?In post 101, Solon wrote:My dear fellow, you misread my post!
Macabre, I swear to God. This game is already demotivating enough without your ridiculous running gag.In post 105, Solon wrote:VOTE: Maria
She is approaching the game exactly as I'd expect scum to do early doors; complacently easing herself back into her armchair, slippers on, by the fire with her cup of cocoa. Reclining back with a satisfied air, waiting for the entertainment to begin.
Well, not on my watch!
Honey you should know it wasn't cause you didn't do anythingIn post 111, Looker wrote:@Elmo: Don't pretend to townread me; I've literally done nothing.
You know what I meant.In post 80, Looker wrote:I skimmed it, but I was really just desperate to be in a game. No offense to the designer. I was just going to play it like a regular normal.In post 29, Knightmare491 wrote:On a more serious note, so you're saying that you had no idea about the setup?Confirmed - MariaR and Dunnstral are scum.In post 62, NDMath wrote:I voted because I get scumread for not voting.
VOTE: Raya36 You're literally a wolf.
- @MariaR: I promise not to pocket as long as you vote someone.
I'm struggling with how you could misinterpret that interaction as bad as you did if you weren't trying to paint me scum.In post 83, Knightmare491 wrote:I don't even know what the hell is this interaction.
In post 55, Tanner wrote:I forgot to close the window, sorry.
Do you agree Math is basically caught scum already?I'm assuming you meant to ask why he said that you are caught scum already?In post 62, NDMath wrote:Excuse me what?
But Tanner had already answered that when he was conversing with EFN here, later you were just satisfied with him saying what he said below.
Spoiler:
In post 63, Tanner wrote:I said I forgot to close the window.What happened here @ND?In post 70, NDMath wrote:Ah. I see.
I struggle to take any of these questions seriously when you phrase them so absurdly.In post 102, Solon wrote:You're casting a shadow upon me in a most disingenuous way. You apparently have no reason to assume Elmo is Town, and yet I am scummy for not jumping to the same assumption? What exactly did I say to provoke this opinion?In post 62, NDMath wrote:When I assume Elmo is town, you look really bad. I have no reason to assume Elmo is town yet though.In post 25, Solon wrote:Solon/Elmo is likely T/S (in some order) says you, yet you proceed to place a seemingly random vote on Tanner?
Explain yourself at once!
Phrasing-wise I was struggling since stating an interaction looks T/S always has scum motivation.
I voted because I get scumread for not voting. I wasn't a fan of the emperor rvs wagon.
Why weren't you a fan of the Emperor wagon, that you preferred an entirely random vote instead? And I still don't understand why you'd go for a random vote over someone who has a 50% chance of being scum in your mind?
@Math, when you answer the other questions, could you elaborate on this? What did "I see" mean here?In post 70, NDMath wrote:Ah. I see.Tanner wrote:I said I forgot to close the window.In post 62, NDMath wrote:Excuse me what?In post 55, Tanner wrote:I forgot to close the window, sorry.
Do you agree Math is basically caught scum already?
2) If elmo is scum, bam there's the T/S interaction. The other situation is where Elmo is town, and that's where your words towards them don't make sense.In post 103, Solon wrote:1) How is it misrepping, from the point of view that I don't know Elmo's alignment? Is it fact that she was manipulating the masses? No. Is it a possibility? Absolutely!In post 70, NDMath wrote:1. I sure hope you don't actually think that that's my reason. When I assume Elmo is town the push in 22 looks absurd and "manipulate the masses" is misrepping the situation greatly.In post 63, Tanner wrote:In post 62, NDMath wrote:When I assume Elmo is town, you look really bad. I have no reason to assume Elmo is town yet though.In post 25, Solon wrote:Solon/Elmo is likely T/S (in some order) says you, yet you proceed to place a seemingly random vote on Tanner?
Explain yourself at once!
Phrasing-wise I was struggling since stating an interaction looks T/S always has scum motivation.
I voted because I get scumread for not voting. I wasn't a fan of the emperor rvs wagon.1.Why does town!Elmo -> scum!Solon, because Solon voted her?2.Even though you yourself have no reason to assume she's Town?
3.Why would stating that always have scum motivation?4.Why so worried about appearances?
2. I said that based off the premise of Elmo being town, I don't understand your question here?
3. Declaring a T/S interaction as scum on two townies means you can hang either then try to get the other the next day.
4. I basically always am. I get mishung quite a bit and am still trying to fix that.
2) It's a faulty premise, as you said yourself you have no reason to make such an assumption! How do you view the situation from an unbiased perspective? Also, is it at all likely in your view that it could be T/S where I am Town and Elmo scum?
3/4) This seems to be true, judging by your meta! Not to worry my boy, I'll bear that in mind and give you every chance to redeem yourself before the day's end.
Peculiar is a good way to describe my town play style.Raya36 wrote:@MathIn post 39, alban wrote:In post 24, NDMath wrote:I suppose everyone can safely soft vigilante now.
The Elmo/Solon interaction has heavy potential to be T/S in some order.
I've already got a slight townread on Dunnstral.
VOTE: Tanner
Elaborate, please.
Each statement reads peculiar.
I've been waiting for a response to this.
He's asking for a better reason than "he isn't always active".Tanner wrote:An answer to 59 is in 60. If you don't see what I'm doing, that's none of my fault.In post 96, Emperor flippyNips wrote:@tanner–You answered nothing
Nice deflection.In post 115, NDMath wrote:I'm struggling with how you could misinterpret that interaction as bad as you did if you weren't trying to paint me scum.
VOTE: Knightmare491
But you choose to answer him.NDMath wrote:@Tanner "I see" meaning I see you have no plans to be cooperative with me so I should just drop it.
Yeah, that MariaR and Dunnstral are scum because they're not voting.In post 115, NDMath wrote:You know what I meant.
At what point does the shtick become counterproductive?In post 116, NDMath wrote:I struggle to take any of these questions seriously when you phrase them so absurdly.
