Spoiler: Springlullaby Vote Progression
In post 40, springlullaby wrote:mmm, so is train cop a bonus skill? Do everyone receive a train cop option at night?
mod:Do I understand correctly that training at night would nullify all other action beside "train cop"?
^If the above is true than train cop is the better option.
1. Have everybody train
2. Have everybody select a target to cop
= 100% no nk, if other mechanics are not at play
If else, strongman is also an ok option.
Neighbor is useless.
capture: momo
In post 168, springlullaby wrote:Ad hominem.
That's a great characteristic of.... OMGUS I THINK.
CAPTURE: HECTIC
-> Setup speculation that is wordy and wrong, then vote for bad ability.
-> Fluff and attempted buddying.
-> Afraid of "starting anything".
Yeah, I did my job for the day I think.
In post 576, springlullaby wrote:I like that Pine vote actually.
HURT: Farkan
Why is a Pine vote weird?
Also + scum for the post preemptively justifying how I was going to flip town.
Can you notice that all the votes from springlullaby are reactionary attacks to people who voted her? There is no trace of scumhunting, the only scum are people who vote springlullaby at any given time. This is also evident by how she stopped attacking Ame now that they are on the same side, for no reason at all since Ame is still the same "dumb player who proposed stupid anti-town strategies", in springlullaby's words. (*see below for the quest leader fight i just recently mentioned)
Spoiler: Springlullaby Claim Progression
In post 112, springlullaby wrote:Ame, are you soft-claiming something?(1)
Just say it now because you aren't going anywhere past N1 with that bullshit.
In post 114, springlullaby wrote:Ok, is Ame village idiot or scum?
In post 116, springlullaby wrote:In any case, if we have town NK, ame needs to be vigged.(2)
Also, everyone vote disable strongman.
In post 160, springlullaby wrote:I will repeat it, you ask stupid question.
What does my PR skills has got to do with anything?
I have to earn a leader vote from you? LOL.
In post 168, springlullaby wrote:Ad hominem.
That's a great characteristic of.... OMGUS I THINK.
CAPTURE: HECTIC
-> Setup speculation that is wordy and wrong, then vote for bad ability.
-> Fluff and attempted buddying.
-> Afraid of "starting anything".
Yeah, I did my job for the day I think.
In post 293, springlullaby wrote:Actually Hectic and Farkset can be scum together again.
In post 482, springlullaby wrote:OK The axis of evil:
AME
FARKAN
HECTIC
Ame:
Bullshit from start of the day to the last series of posts.
Cop training is obviously anti town.
> In a PR heavy game, cop training does nothing for town beside false positives.
> It's however great for scum because it consistently out PR's.
>This has been discussed already, can AME be vigged?
Hectic:
Seriously zero contribution but a lame vote on FOC.
And a ton.
Farkan:
The last case is just I'm taken aback by how far it fetch.
It also contain a scumslip as I did not know scum had a PT.
The rest of town better wake up soon.
I'm still confortable with my ginngie vote on a behavior only basis: nothing but reactionary content.
Farkset's last is just terrible.
Also, claim: town voyeur.(3)
In post 495, springlullaby wrote:I have an upgrade in 1 XP that's why I want leadership btw.
In post 501, springlullaby wrote:In post 499, Farkset wrote:I don't believe thisIn post 495, springlullaby wrote:I have an upgrade in 1 XP that's why I want leadership btw.
-Farkran
Actually you are right. I misread.(4)
In post 506, springlullaby wrote:Do you want to fish more?
Realistically, what do you wish to gain in that line of questionning.
In post 540, springlullaby wrote:... ^ This needs to be vigged. NK'd whatever.
No rational choice can be expected if town.
+ Bad read?
In post 785, springlullaby wrote:In post 781, Lady Chloe wrote:Ame,
I acknowledge your claim, and I follow your train of thought on the capture, as I do with others who want to capture but am not quite convinced.
I want to strengthen my reads a bit more before I speak of them so openly.
Who am I to vote for, if not to avoid capturing?
Lady Chloe, enough.
Plenty of material already.
Make up your mind on your own and provide an actual read.
@Ame, from my understanding, you can't be vigged.(5)
This day needs to stop ASAP.
I see nothing good coming out of it.(6)
In post 828, springlullaby wrote:Farkscum is trying to drawn out the thread with spam.
Their bullshit reasons has been debunked multiple times, by multiple people.
More bullshit from Farkscum:
> Off course I'm "survivalistic, I'm town. And a PR.
> If "survivalistic" was a valid argument, then by by their own logic Farkset should vote themselves to prove that they are town.
Another instance of the bullshit that permeates their entire ISO.
The numbers represent the progression of springlullaby, where she goes from fishing, to claim unprovoked and flaily, to attacking fishers to forward her inconsistent scumcase on players who voted her.
Is this a towny slot to any of you? Have you actually read her ISO? I don't think it is possible that this will ever ring town
with a strong confidence
. This is a jestery slot, with an unprovoked claim of voyeur (bad PR utility-wise), a flail while soft-counterclaimed (501) and no pro-town behavior whatsoever. As i said, to answer Ame: the only reason to townread Springlullaby is for how other people behaved around the slot
NOT
mean springlullaby is town or that i ever towncased her. It means that, IF she is town, we should look into the people who EITHER TMIed her town
, OR pushed her as lhf.
This does not mean everyone.
If she flips scum, instead, we should look into the people who EITHER supported/defended her with little reason
, OR distanced from those people, but without leading the wagon on springlul.
I color coded the subsets of people i'm referring to: the same color means that it's the same subset of people, different colors mean they are different people. The only thing they have in common is the fact that they interacted awkwardly with springlullaby.
Ok so far?Now, on to display all of these circumstances:
Spoiler: FOC
In post 191, momo wrote:HURT: Springlullaby
Scummiest attempt to get townread I have seen in a while. I shouldn’t need to explain this vote and won’t because I’m about to sleep, but I’ll write up my thoughts tmmrw after I meta dive spring.
Should be noted that Hectic is taking a very distinct approach to this game...playing in a highly questioning manner. Haven’t played with him before, but I think his slot will prove to be readable by comparing the questioning tone with his recent games.
In post 454, Farkset wrote:Ok.In post 440, Hectic wrote:Not very. I didn't like 292In post 429, Farkset wrote:Springullaby how did you write the instances of that list? Literally, what did you do to write it?
Also hectic how confident would you say you are in pinkball alignment right now?
I have a 2-sided theory that i need to explore
-Farkran
So, hectic, why was your first thought to townread springlullaby based on the switched positions between you and pinkball? My first thought wasn't that.
I thought that scum could have been discussing joining quests or not in their PT, pinkball could have agreed there before you and before outing it in the main thread and that's how springlullaby parsed it first.
Also, i would think that's a more likely reason for springlullaby to correct that mistake without announcing it. If she wanted to sort the quest takers in order of joining and noticed an error, she could have announced the mistake. Instead, if the mistake could imply a scumslip, she'd just hope nobody would notice.
Now, if i was editing a readlist, i would copypaste the playerlist in a notepad and then copypaste individual names in the order i want them to be. Often, i sort people as i meet them in the playerlist. Like this: 1st player, townread; 2nd player, scumread; etc. I asked springlullaby to explain how she wrote the list because this process can generate errors, so it is still plausible that pinkball got above because he is also above in the original playerlist.
However, it surprises me that Hectic didn't think of the scum PT when he is scumleaning both of the slots involved. I don't know if i should consider this a townslip from hectic.
Anyways, this is a very tinfoil-y theory about what happened, but i think it will be worth to check it for validity when a flip occurs. Today, it's probably worth it to just block springlullaby and see what happens.
HURT: springlullaby
-Farkran
In post 534, Flight of the Conchords wrote:@Fark
@Hectic
@momo
You guys never try to evolve or learn from your mistakes, do you? Always surface level reads and always trying to fit the game narrative to your preconceived delusional way of seeing things.
P.S. If Ame is town aligned then add her to the list above.
-Jemaine
In post 651, Flight of the Conchords wrote:So, you pushed someone to L-1 and they claimed a power role to avoid being captured.
Just like I said would happen.
Have you realized it's a bad idea yet, or are you all still being dense?
This day needs to end, and it should end without without using the capture.
We wait until lynch becomes available.
- Bret
Notice how FOC becomes aggressive specifically against slots who are defending springlullaby, without any kind of progression on them or any reason to townread springlullaby so far? Particularly in the last two posts - is there a particular reason to attack us so fiercely, using our push on springlullaby as theIn post 706, Flight of the Conchords wrote:Thank you very much.In post 656, Farkset wrote:i think she is the type of player to be excessivelystubbornas either alignment - prettysimilar to me-
Also the push on lullaby is B.A.D
Now add scumreading us too and everyone else will get what I'm talking about (but not you)
I mean this is bad. You say you don't like the idea. YOU. You assumed it come from experienced players (when only one completed themed game was required). So you don't know who Bret is and you don't know why he picked neighborizer and you don't understand why leaving strongman in play was no issue for him, and you built your whole case around those unknowns.In post 242, Farkset wrote:Flight of the Conchords - I don't like TSTBS posts from either alignment, and being a secret hydra i'd assume it comes from experienced players, not newbies. This is the main reason i'm scumleaning them instead of giving them the benefit of doubt.
Want more? mmK
1) First bolded segment you made two assumptions. You assumed scum would want to use strongman on N1 and you assumed strongman bypasses the capture blocking effectIn post 475, Farkset wrote:1) If the 3 scum decide to join the quest, they will have lylo-equivalent voting power for the leader, making it more likely for the leader to be mafia, resulting in a catastrophical failure because they would get xp, gift, and free reins on the kill.The kill part is solved in the captured version, since the captured player cannot strongman (which i assume it would bypass the roleblock by capture?)today for a lack of xp.I also assume that mafia do not start with more than 1 xp.I'm not sure how much i would place my faith in "Each player starts with 1 XP unless otherwise specified, and players can never have less than 0 XP. Players are always aware of how much XP they have." but... probably they start with 1 xp, or at least most of them do.
2) Second bolded segment you assumed none of the 3 mafia members starts with more than 1 xp when a more reasonable assumption would be for the mod to give one of them 2 xp at the start of the game if they needed to strongman from the beginning which in itself was a bad assumption unless you assume we have more than one protective role from the start too. You even said it yourself, You're not sure how much faith you'd put in your interpretation of the mod's declaration but you still insist it's probably 1. Then you say at least most of them when most of 3 is 2 meaning 1 could have started with more than 1 xp which makes your whole argument look like horseshit when viewed from that angle.
Now should I assume you are a good player? Because if so I find myself obliged to assume you know what you're doing in which case I assume you are scum spreading havoc.
I suggest you step aside and put kerset on for a while. Maybe she can remedy the situation.
-Jemaine
only
attempt to sort our slot? However, a vote does not appear until our wagon becomes popular, in post 899.Spoiler: momo
Now i thought momo was one of the lhf pushers at the time - he isn't very active, makes sense as scum if springlullaby is town. This read has weakened over time, but it was there when i was talking about weird interactions around springlullaby.In post 191, momo wrote:HURT: Springlullaby
Scummiest attempt to get townread I have seen in a while. I shouldn’t need to explain this vote and won’t because I’m about to sleep, but I’ll write up my thoughts tmmrw after I meta dive spring.
Should be noted that Hectic is taking a very distinct approach to this game...playing in a highly questioning manner. Haven’t played with him before, but I think his slot will prove to be readable by comparing the questioning tone with his recent games.
Spoiler: Ame
This is what i found dangerous coming from Ame. How in the world would you possibly trust springlullaby as a quest leader, after having experienced first-hand her scumhunting and terrible claim timing? Now i have changed my mind on Ame/Springlullaby being a possible team, because in 962 she still fears Ame for gaining leader popularity, which makes me think they are truly disaligned rather than theatrics. But that happened way after my case on springlullaby.In post 550, Ame wrote:I also strongly support making Spring the leader. I'd like to see what they do. I still get mad weird vibes from everyone trying to get everyone into the quest though so I'm still not joining and I suggest that others do the same.
Spoiler: Lady Chloe, but also an individual case on springlullaby
This is ostensibly the first post from Chloe after Springlullaby wagon got to 5 people (VC 1.4, post 525). Springlullaby immediately sheeped it. The point about town not losing xp by being captured had already been pointed out, so springlullaby only fears the roleblock? As a voyeur? Why isn't she fearing the quest sabotage then, which has a strictly worse effect on town and
is directly controlled by mafia
?Spoiler: NK15
In post 296, Not Known 15 wrote:They are either overconfident and rude town or powerwolfing scum. The second is a real possibility, and that one is higher than default, so yes, I have a scumread on them. A weak one. If we had access to lynch, which we sadly don`t, a lynch would be highly recommended because them being alive is heavily anti-town.In post 291, Farkset wrote:@NK15 is this vote because springlullaby irritated you or do you have an AI read on her?
And about questing: Town should not want that sabotage being around at Night 2+ because losing all stored xp is... too bad at that point. I can get behind the reasoning for a day 1/night 1 quest but after that, the potential damage is just too big.
In post 476, Not Known 15 wrote:... and some players cannot afford to train cop because they have a role like pacifist... then we have town autofarmers... if they are suspected we have a false guilty...In post 475, Farkset wrote:In post 438, Ame wrote:So I think I came up with a game-breaking Train Cop strategy.
No Capture Version
7 players go on the quest
We decided publically who will be the leader. The leader is free to use any action they choose.
The other 6 questers Train
Each of the 6 non-questers is assigned to Train cop one of the (non-leader) questers.
Capture Version
7 players go on the quest including the captured player.
The leader is decided publically and is free to use any action they choose.
The other 5 questers Train
Each of the 6 non-questers is assigned to Train cop the 6 non-captured questers including the leader. (Alternatively one of the questers remains unassigned)
In this way, mafia can't join the quest without being forced to Train! So at least one mafia will have to remain outside of the quest in order to do the kill. And the others inside the quest will not be able to use their abilities! So mafia has to decide to either A) be a part of the quest or B) use their abilities.In post 443, Ame wrote:Like even if they aren't assigned to their partner, they can still use their ability and simply say that the person they were assigned to trained.In post 441, Ame wrote:Indeed, but that's not the primary goal. The primary goal is forcing mafia to have to either use their ability/kill OR be inside the quest, not both.In post 439, Pink Ball wrote:What if mafia is assigned to train cop the mafia inside the quest so they're free to do what they wantIn post 444, Ame wrote:Oh I see, we can't account for that, but it's less likely than is that they'll be assigned to their partner.It sounds nice, however there are several potential problems with itIn post 449, Ame wrote:What I like about this is that if there is a kill, we know ~100% that it was one of the people outside of the quest that did it. (~accept for the potential of mafia being assigned to their partner)
1) If the 3 scum decide to join the quest, they will have lylo-equivalent voting power for the leader, making it more likely for the leader to be mafia, resulting in a catastrophical failure because they would get xp, gift, and free reins on the kill. The kill part is solved in the captured version, since the captured player cannot strongman (which i assume it would bypass the roleblock by capture?) today for a lack of xp. I also assume that mafia do not start with more than 1 xp. I'm not sure how much i would place my faith inbut... probably they start with 1 xp, or at least most of them do."Each player starts with 1 XP unless otherwise specified, and players can never have less than 0 XP. Players are always aware of how much XP they have."
2) Any mafia outside of the quest can kill freely and claim that the player assigned to them trained, even if town. There is no valid way to be sure all mafia are placed on the quest, so how do we know what happened? This is also not considering the possibility that mafia outside is assigned to check mafia inside, which would be a really bad result to trust later on.
I think the risk for disaster is too high compared to the benefit. Effort put into mechbreaking the setup is still town points to me though - i don't think scum would try that much to validate a train cop strategy
-Farkran
In post 483, Not Known 15 wrote:?????????????????????????In post 482, springlullaby wrote:It also contain a scumslip as I did not know scum had a PT.
In post 486, Not Known 15 wrote:Yes.In post 485, springlullaby wrote:Did you know scum had daychat?In post 483, Not Known 15 wrote:?????????????????????????In post 482, springlullaby wrote:It also contain a scumslip as I did not know scum had a PT.
In post 490, Not Known 15 wrote:It says that all PT`s have daytalk.In post 488, springlullaby wrote:In post 487, Not Known 15 wrote:In post 1, Professor Moriarty wrote:15. All private topics have daytalk. Any private topics are welcome to request a Discord server.
It doesn't indicate that scum has a daychat PT.
Mafia have a scum PT in approximately 99% of all games.
In post 582, Not Known 15 wrote:No, it`s not. Don`t disable lurkers.In post 578, springlullaby wrote:^This is really bad.
In post 813, Not Known 15 wrote:Are you insane? Do you want scum to auto - win by roleblocking you without end?In post 767, Ame wrote:So I've been thinking about this and I think it's best I claim. When I die, I become a treestump and the lynch mechanic activates. I've been trying to play in a way so as to draw the night kill, but with two claims now and seeing as FOC's, in particular, suggests a strong PR, I think that's probably not happening. So I'm claiming now to suggest that perhaps vig can aim for me tonight? I think there may be another way to activate the mechanic also because it says it will activate when I dieunlessit's already activated.
Do NOT join the quest, at least.
I initially thought NK15 was one of the lhf pushers - now, the last NK15 vote happenedIn post 959, Not Known 15 wrote:HURT: Farkset
The motivation does indeed seem to be hidden here. Probably scum?
Also, the leader on the quest should be me, because I am town.
after
the explanation of my case against springlullaby, but this is a pretty terrible progression to make post 959 on, and it already started on post 813 where he is trying to remove Ame from questing because… why? What does roleblocking have to do with Ame's claim?At the time of my case against springlullaby, how could
any
of these people have such a strong confidence on springlullaby's alignment, in either direction, based on the content provided? It ringed immensely weird to me, and that's why i still think springlullaby should 1. Never, ever be quest leader, 2. be captured today because she's more plausibly scum than town, 3. learn her alignment as soon as possible and analyze it to produce a solve.-Farkran