This is really lazy.In post 248, farside wrote:You are scum!!!!
You are lucky I wanted to play with you this game, but man there is no way I find anything on this page town coming from you.
Everyone learns
This is really lazy.In post 248, farside wrote:You are scum!!!!
You are lucky I wanted to play with you this game, but man there is no way I find anything on this page town coming from you.
Like said, not offended.In post 249, farside wrote:Sorry I got the term from my co-worker. He tends to be older then everyone and he calls me kid. I just get the impression from your post that you are much younger then I am.
Writing this off is both shocking analysis and a clear and identifying statement that you're unable to consider a possibility you haven't set your mind on.In post 235, Persivul wrote:So you're that sure we couldn't lynch scum?In post 153, Drew-Sta wrote:You can lynch me today if you need. I’m happy to be a martyr if you can’t settle on another townie.
Not a serious question. Now that the lynch is AFAIC settled, everything from scum is wifom. But I thought the way he phrased that was interesting.
This is foolish and poorly thought out.In post 236, Persivul wrote:If he were "also lying," that would mean zero millers, not two.In post 159, Drew-Sta wrote:I guess why I’m saying that is it is possible he’s also lying.
Look, I’m going to die. That’s fine. But at least consider the possibility of two millers.
Explain why.In post 237, Persivul wrote:Yeah, that's what I was thinking reading that exchange. Drew's the one doing the gaslighting.In post 202, Riabi wrote:Why don't you stop trying to summarize what I'm saying and let me speak for myself?
I agree that scum will WIFOM here. About the smartest thing you've posted so far.In post 238, Persivul wrote:Drew is highly likely to be scum. He's highly likely to be the lynch. That means that everything coming from scum at this point is WIFOM. In my experience, that hurts town more than helps. We need more votes here.In post 203, Not Known 15 wrote:Drew-Sta (3)Persivul;mavsfan41;Knightmare491;
Foolish response.In post 240, Persivul wrote:Scum claim.In post 210, Drew-Sta wrote:When I show up as town, what will be your first response in the game eg what will you look to do?
Explain your comment on Una.In post 248, farside wrote:I disagree with 3 completely. If players aren't sure and a player claims miller a vig shot on that player is the best thing for the town.In post 234, Persivul wrote:First, he's not going to be there tonight. A 2-miller setup is very unlikely, making him very likely to be scum.In post 150, GeorgeBailey wrote:I still think that if there's a vig, he should definitely be the target tonight.
Second, we don't even know that we have a vig.
Third, a vig should never shoot someone who's easily lynchable anyway.
You are scum!!!!In post 238, Persivul wrote:Drew is highly likely to be scum. He's highly likely to be the lynch. That means that everything coming from scum at this point is WIFOM. In my experience, that hurts town more than helps. We need more votes here.In post 203, Not Known 15 wrote:Drew-Sta (3)Persivul;mavsfan41;Knightmare491;
You are lucky I wanted to play with you this game, but man there is no way I find anything on this page town coming from you.
On a completely unrelated note, Unabomb in no longer on the top of my scum list.
Salad, Persivul and Knight.
Still waiting for a few people to post more before finalizing my list.
Declaring yourself as town eh? So we should listen to you? Ridiculous.In post 250, Persivul wrote:This is really lazy.In post 248, farside wrote:You are scum!!!!
You are lucky I wanted to play with you this game, but man there is no way I find anything on this page town coming from you.
Everyone learnsinfo is good don't rush the lynchin their first newbie game. I was on Drew before the claims. I'm mostly town read at this point. There's no incentive for scum!pers to rush the lynch here. As said, in my experience, extending a clear wifom situation generally doesn't help town.
Well I can explain why everything read scummy that page.In post 250, Persivul wrote:This is really lazy.In post 248, farside wrote:You are scum!!!!
You are lucky I wanted to play with you this game, but man there is no way I find anything on this page town coming from you.
Everyone learnsinfo is good don't rush the lynchin their first newbie game. I was on Drew before the claims. I'm mostly town read at this point. There's no incentive for scum!pers to rush the lynch here. As said, in my experience, extending a clear wifom situation generally doesn't help town.
I've considered it and dismissed it. Based on my experience with the normal queue, it's very unlikely that there would be two millers. Other people beat me to it, but I actually find a zero-miller scum gambit more likely than that. People do dumb shit to try to win scummies.In post 252, Drew-Sta wrote: Writing this off is both shocking analysis and a clear and identifying statement that you're unable to consider a possibility you haven't set your mind on.
Sure. He makes a judgment based on probabilities - two millers is low probability. That's fine, as most decisions by town in this game are judgments of probability. But, you rephrase it to imply that he's saying two millers is an impossibility, or that he refuses to consider the possibility. That's gaslighting.Explain why.In post 237, Persivul wrote:Yeah, that's what I was thinking reading that exchange. Drew's the one doing the gaslighting.In post 202, Riabi wrote:Why don't you stop trying to summarize what I'm saying and let me speak for myself?
Can't argue with something that ambiguous. You do you.In post 253, farside wrote:Well I can explain why everything read scummy that page.
The short version is that it reads fake. Each post come off with empty words and im feeling a lot of buddying coming from you.
Hmmmm
Persivul wrote:Can't argue with something that ambiguous. You do you.In post 253, farside wrote:Well I can explain why everything read scummy that page.
The short version is that it reads fake. Each post come off with empty words and im feeling a lot of buddying coming from you.
In post 260, PranaDevil wrote:@farside, why are you viewing Drew as town? I assume as much as you viewed persivul as scum seemingly due to his vote on Drew.
(Also, I've spotted something rather interesting that I wish to bring up, but only after farside's response)
This was really all you needed to say. The rest of your argument is WIFOMy enough to be entirely pointless.
Interesting theory, and something I'd never considered, but it's definitely worthy of thinking about. I'm still not quite sure I buy a double miller set up though. Have you any thoughts on if we have two millers, or if one of the two is lying?In post 261, farside wrote:In post 260, PranaDevil wrote:@farside, why are you viewing Drew as town? I assume as much as you viewed persivul as scum seemingly due to his vote on Drew.
(Also, I've spotted something rather interesting that I wish to bring up, but only after farside's response)
*puts on crazy/wifom hat*
I don't see scum claiming that early with little pressure. To be fair I was scum reading Drew from the start too. His post to Tanner about George was a bit much. His complaint about the votes was hypocritical and bias to say the least. But with manvs claim he believed in it and he even talked about it here with in regards to wifom: https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... #p11747814.
He could have stayed quiet after the CC or he could have OMGUS voted manvs as scum.
Scum is going to know they are up shit creek with a CC and get defensive. Instead he is still scum hunting. questing people and know he will be lynched.
if he flips scum I would give him a high five for the deceiving so well.
^In post 235, Persivul wrote:So you're that sure we couldn't lynch scum?In post 153, Drew-Sta wrote:You can lynch me today if you need. I’m happy to be a martyr if you can’t settle on another townie.
I could call it playing over 13 years on MS instead if you want.In post 262, Riabi wrote:This was really all you needed to say. The rest of your argument is WIFOMy enough to be entirely pointless.
Idk. I don't like the idea of 2 millers. I'm trying my best to remember when I was helping players with balance and game idea's for normal once upon a time ago.In post 263, PranaDevil wrote:Interesting theory, and something I'd never considered, but it's definitely worthy of thinking about. I'm still not quite sure I buy a double miller set up though. Have you any thoughts on if we have two millers, or if one of the two is lying?In post 261, farside wrote:In post 260, PranaDevil wrote:@farside, why are you viewing Drew as town? I assume as much as you viewed persivul as scum seemingly due to his vote on Drew.
(Also, I've spotted something rather interesting that I wish to bring up, but only after farside's response)
*puts on crazy/wifom hat*
I don't see scum claiming that early with little pressure. To be fair I was scum reading Drew from the start too. His post to Tanner about George was a bit much. His complaint about the votes was hypocritical and bias to say the least. But with manvs claim he believed in it and he even talked about it here with in regards to wifom: https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... #p11747814.
He could have stayed quiet after the CC or he could have OMGUS voted manvs as scum.
Scum is going to know they are up shit creek with a CC and get defensive. Instead he is still scum hunting. questing people and know he will be lynched.
if he flips scum I would give him a high five for the deceiving so well.
As for the interesting thing I spotted...
^In post 235, Persivul wrote:So you're that sure we couldn't lynch scum?In post 153, Drew-Sta wrote:You can lynch me today if you need. I’m happy to be a martyr if you can’t settle on another townie.
Scumslip.
The only people who know, factually, whether Drew is scum or not are, in fact, the scum. This line feels very much like Persivul knows Drew is town.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Persivul
He's not saying "Drew is scum", he's saying "So we should lynch you instead of scum"In post 266, Tanner wrote:How is that a scumslip?
Reread it. Slowly.In post 263, PranaDevil wrote:Scumslip.
Exactly.In post 268, Tanner wrote:...no?
Drew basically said "If you cannot settle on lynching another Townie, lynch me" (and implying he's Town)
To which the response was "are you that sure we couldn't lynch scum?" (asking if Drew is very certain today's lynch would be that of a Townie, even if Drew himself isn't lynched)
How the hell do you get "we should lynch you instead of scum" there?