Exactly. Why would you try to defend yourself in the worst way possible?In post 149, nomnomnom wrote:Yeah this is pretty much the biggest redflag imo, this is like trying to defend yourself in the worst way possible? I don't know.
-Smart
Exactly. Why would you try to defend yourself in the worst way possible?In post 149, nomnomnom wrote:Yeah this is pretty much the biggest redflag imo, this is like trying to defend yourself in the worst way possible? I don't know.
I guess that's the type of argument that you could say I'm making. But really it's just that it's superficially scummy-looking.In post 151, GuiltyLion wrote:p-edit: oh you're going the 'too scummy to be scum' route I guess
So it sounds like you don't like his response because it was unexpected?In post 154, GuiltyLion wrote:I just wished he were more indignant. I accused him! Why would he be so willing to acknowledge that they were weak questions but then also suggest that I'm a good vote because I pushed him on it, it also feels like there's dissonance there.
Yes, it's not not a huge difference functionally - that's why I found that interesting. Even after your explanation that you're not really scared of scum!me I find the usage of the word "paranoia" a little weird coming from town, to be honest.In post 142, GuiltyLion wrote:ehhh you know it's not a huge difference I guess, and I wasn't saying that because I'm scared of scum!you in particular, it's more just I felt I had town!pings from those slots bc they were doing things that I didn't find natural to fake as scum, whereas with your posts I was finding myself more agreeing with them than thinking "oh yeah scum isn't likely to post this".
It's not a major thing and if you pushed me further on it I dunno if I'd be able to convincingly show exactly why the read felt different, was mostly operating off of my first gut impression reading through.
@GuiltyLion: Is it implied anywhere in his posts that he found you a good vote because you pushed him on it? The quoted part does not imply that, for me. Perhaps I missed it.In post 107, acryon wrote:I think calling what I'm doing "scumhunting" at all would be an overstatement. I'm just asking some friendly questions. My scumhunting is a bit rusty, but we'll get there.
I like keeping my vote on you though frankly.
she opened by giving townreads on you and Karnage based off of your opening posts, then further also gave reason to townread Eve in 56, that's narrowing her lynchpool very quickly and generally I think a decent indicator of town when done in the way she did, bringing novel townreads ASAP (as opposed to agreeing with consensus townreads). I also liked her acryon vote/timing, it was the right diagnosis of which slot needed pressure the most IMO.In post 157, Auro wrote:Can you point to anything Skitter did that you find unnatural to fake as scum?
he directly responded to me pushing him and then said he liked keeping his vote there, I didn't think it's a stretch to assume those things are related. If he has other reasons for voting me then those are absent from his post.In post 159, Auro wrote:@GuiltyLion: Is it implied anywhere in his posts that he found you a good vote because you pushed him on it? The quoted part does not imply that, for me. Perhaps I missed it.
Do you think he should have unvoted you because he acknowledged your attack had some merit to it?
Target | Wagon |
---|---|
acryon (3) | skitter30 (104), GuiltyLion (106), nomnomnom (108) |
GuiltyLion (2) | The Limit Does Not Exist (5), acryon (15) |
The Limit Does Not Exist (2) | SausasaurusRex (6), Auro (42) |
nomnomnom (2) | Karnage (26), Eve (118) |
Eve (1) | Allomancer (14) |
Karnage (1) | BBmolla (7) |
Not Voting (0) |
Not gonna lie this is something I hadn't thought of until this post but it makes a ton of senseIn post 75, Auro wrote:Something_Smart, have you not considered that there is a mechanical reason to want to be on the wagon as town?
To take up a slot that scum could have taken; thus forcing them to stay off of it?
I think trying to call someone out for "fake scumhunting" with my extremely minimal body of work seemed disingenuous.In post 123, skitter30 wrote:what don't you like about gl here?In post 107, acryon wrote:I like keeping my vote on you though frankly.
Maybe, maybe you wouldn't want to get into it. I was more interested in seeing her backup that claim. Admittedly I wanted to ask that question a bit earlier but got tied up and came back later to ask it (where it was maybe less releveant).In post 123, skitter30 wrote:if it wasn't the case wouldn't i have called her out on that claim?In post 111, acryon wrote: Just wanted to make sure that was the case. And when he shot back, you kind of fluffed in response.
not sure where you're seeing fluffing ?
Sorry about that. Won't make the mistake again!In post 123, skitter30 wrote:(also i'm a she btw)
This and the few posts before it feel a bit like playing dumb for someone with so much experience.In post 131, skitter30 wrote:so like i have no idea why you'd want to be doing that as town
but like i can see some benefits to doing that as scum
pedit that's the flippant part
Now my intelligence is going to be insulted if nomnom keeps her vote on me.In post 150, The Limit Does Not Exist wrote:Exactly. Why would you try to defend yourself in the worst way possible?In post 149, nomnomnom wrote:Yeah this is pretty much the biggest redflag imo, this is like trying to defend yourself in the worst way possible? I don't know.
-Smart
Nothing to be indignant about. I think you're wrong and could possibly have bad intentions, but most people are wrong right now (including me).In post 154, GuiltyLion wrote:I just wished he were more indignant. I accused him! Why would he be so willing to acknowledge that they were weak questions but then also suggest that I'm a good vote because I pushed him on it, it also feels like there's dissonance there.
This was my first WoW name. I thought it sounded like a cool fantasy name, but quickly realized I should've spelled it differently when everyone in my guild called me crayon...In post 157, Auro wrote:I'll let the acryon thing play out a little more. I find the name slightly disturbing as a misspelling of crayon.
No--see answer to Skitter up top.In post 159, Auro wrote:@GuiltyLion: Is it implied anywhere in his posts that he found you a good vote because you pushed him on it? The quoted part does not imply that, for me. Perhaps I missed it.In post 107, acryon wrote:I think calling what I'm doing "scumhunting" at all would be an overstatement. I'm just asking some friendly questions. My scumhunting is a bit rusty, but we'll get there.
I like keeping my vote on you though frankly.
Do you think he should have unvoted you because he acknowledged your attack had some merit to it?
It doesn’t seem like the link is going to a post, what’s the post # for thisIn post 170, acryon wrote:Re: Fluffing -- She went from questioning you to fluffing you here (ironically while talking about fluffing).
Dang. Apparently forgot how to do that right. 85In post 172, The Limit Does Not Exist wrote:It doesn’t seem like the link is going to a post, what’s the post # for thisIn post 170, acryon wrote:Re: Fluffing -- She went from questioning you to fluffing you here (ironically while talking about fluffing).
- Smarter