In post 140, Auro wrote:You're kinda deflecting there, Skitter
You were putting in energy to try and sort/engage with Eve, when was arguably easier to just go take a five-minute look. So you're saying you could have, but you just felt lazy then also?
yep, pretty much
and I see what you mean, the tone thing is probably nai
=
In post 141, GuiltyLion wrote:
why does this always happen
you agree that the post I quoted is bad, right? and personally I wasn't impressed with the reply to me either.
i think the auro-paranoia think is what was pinging me? idk.
yeah, that's kinda why i voted there in the first place; his posts had this like passive ~poking at the edge of things without actually getting his feet yet~ kinda vibe, like he was posting for the purpose of posting
i actually thought his response about 'i think that calling what i'm doing scumhunting at all to be an overstatement' was decent and like self-aware in a way that i think is somewhat unlikely to come from scum, but i thought his reaction to your vote on him was OMGUS-y
In post 151, GuiltyLion wrote:I guess in writing this out though it might comes down to differing interpretations of tone.
p-edit: oh you're going the 'too scummy to be scum' route I guess
well not too scummy to be scum exactly so much as i'm not sure that scum think to respond to that accusation that way
like if you've accused scum of not scumhunting i think the natural reaction is to go like: 'no i have been scumhunting', or to deflect, but this feels more tongue-in-cheek and a bit more self-aware than that to me
that being said that's kinda like the only line in his iso thus far that i thought was low-key townie
=
In post 167, BBmolla wrote:Sorry I’ve been inactive. I’m having an off day. I’ll be back tomorrow.
i hope things get better soon!