| Target | Wagon |
|---|---|
Allomancer (3) | nomnomnom (211), The Limit Does Not Exist (213), GuiltyLion (229) |
Eve (2) | Auro (330), BBmolla (354) |
acryon (1) | Allomancer (215) |
BBmolla (1) | Eve (361) |
Not Voting (4) | SausasaurusRex (219), skitter30 (231), Karnage (299), acryon (314) |
In what world do you think Karnage was agreeing with you?In post 376, Eve wrote:Rex you should definitely join me in voting BBmolla
Karnage saw what he did there too
This made me lol. Also I agree.In post 372, BBmolla wrote:Sausage sounds like a robot trying to sound human
Can you provide an update to your read on Eve? You said her posts didn't seem townie and you wanted to see more.In post 371, SausasaurusRex wrote:I don’t think we should follow through with the allomancer lynch. Whilst his ISO isn’tgood, it’s not terrible either. I think the best course of action is to scumhunt a little more first, to see if anyone else seems more scummy. We have a deadline, and we may as well use all that time. If allomancer still seems the scummiest after that time, then we can lynch him. But my point is that we shouldn’t lynch him yet.
What did you not like about it? Do you think scum!BB was trying to protect scum!Auro?In post 364, Eve wrote:yeah i don't like the way you stepped in to defend Auro there
In post 362, Karnage wrote:I'm confused?In post 361, Eve wrote:VOTE: BBMolla
having potential scum be checked should be a lot more useful to you than yourself being cleared
your voting BB but critizing auro? or am i interpreting this wrong?
I think you are confused tooIn post 376, Eve wrote:Karnage saw what he did there too
You’re saying that on page 16 we don’t have enough info to lynch, but you were happy to say that Eve should be lynched back on page 9 for even less content than Allomancer has as of 371. What’s up with that?In post 371, SausasaurusRex wrote:I don’t think we should follow through with the allomancer lynch. Whilst his ISO isn’tgood, it’s not terrible either. I think the best course of action is to scumhunt a little more first, to see if anyone else seems more scummy. We have a deadline, and we may as well use all that time. If allomancer still seems the scummiest after that time, then we can lynch him. But my point is that we shouldn’t lynch him yet.
At ease about what? Your Allo push (which I don't have a problem with at all to be clear)?In post 382, nomnomnom wrote:Yeah I'm not convinced about this eve push. Makes me feel at ease.
But why would scum want to be off the wagon?In post 361, Eve wrote:VOTE: BBMolla
having potential scum be checked should be a lot more useful to you than yourself being cleared
It’s currently Auro, bbmolla, and acryon on the Eve wagon.
I didn’t say Eve should be lynched. I said that if her content does not get better she should be lynched. I even specifically asked for more content from her, as if I wanted more information before a lynch. You will notice I didn’t even vote her, much less call for an immediate lynch upon her. What you said is a very badly done misrepresentation of my what I said.In post 381, The Limit Does Not Exist wrote:You’re saying that on page 16 we don’t have enough info to lynch, but you were happy to say that Eve should be lynched back on page 9 for even less content than Allomancer has as of 371. What’s up with that?In post 371, SausasaurusRex wrote:I don’t think we should follow through with the allomancer lynch. Whilst his ISO isn’tgood, it’s not terrible either. I think the best course of action is to scumhunt a little more first, to see if anyone else seems more scummy. We have a deadline, and we may as well use all that time. If allomancer still seems the scummiest after that time, then we can lynch him. But my point is that we shouldn’t lynch him yet.
- Smarter
I feel like you're not actuallyIn post 390, SausasaurusRex wrote:I didn’t say Eve should be lynched. I said that if her content does not get better she should be lynched. I even specifically asked for more content from her, as if I wanted more information before a lynch. You will notice I didn’t even vote her, much less call for an immediate lynch upon her. What you said is a very badly done misrepresentation of my what I said.In post 381, The Limit Does Not Exist wrote:You’re saying that on page 16 we don’t have enough info to lynch, but you were happy to say that Eve should be lynched back on page 9 for even less content than Allomancer has as of 371. What’s up with that?In post 371, SausasaurusRex wrote:I don’t think we should follow through with the allomancer lynch. Whilst his ISO isn’tgood, it’s not terrible either. I think the best course of action is to scumhunt a little more first, to see if anyone else seems more scummy. We have a deadline, and we may as well use all that time. If allomancer still seems the scummiest after that time, then we can lynch him. But my point is that we shouldn’t lynch him yet.
- Smarter
I still think we should wait a little longer before we lynch anyone. Even if it turns out Allomancer is scum, we will still have gained useful information.
I was originally really confused by the “if it does not” because I couldn’t figure out what that meant, so I assumed you just meant “let’s lynch Eve,” but now I see that you meant “if her play does not get better.” So that’s my bad.In post 219, SausasaurusRex wrote:Calm down Smarter, there’s no need to prod me yet. It’s been a little longer than I thought it had been, but I’ve not broken any rules. My lurking won’t become a regular thing, I assure you.
In response to Auro’s townbloc, I disagree with Karnage’s placement. He isn’t scummy, but neither is he amazingly towny. I agree with placing Nomnomnom there, however.
I’m townreading both players in TheLimitDoesNotExist, so UNVOTE: . I know it’s ironic for me to say this, but I’d like more content from Eve. Her posts don’t seem very towny, but I’m willing to overlook that as early-game banter if her play gets better.If it does not, I think she is the correct day 1 lynch, unless someone else does something worse.
If anyone has any questions for me, ask and I will answer.
Okay now I’m riled up so holding off on vegetable mode to reply to this.In post 392, SausasaurusRex wrote:I don’t think Eve’s content has got any better, and I would prefer to lynch her than lynch Allomancer. However, I would still like to wait a little before we do so, in order to gather more information for later days and for day 1. My point in 371 was to discourage an immediate lynch on Allomancer and encourage people to gather more information before making a final decision on a day 1 lynch.
In post 392, SausasaurusRex wrote:I don’t think Eve’s content has got any better, and I would prefer to lynch her than lynch Allomancer. However, I would still like to wait a little before we do so, in order to gather more information for later days and for day 1. My point in 371 was to discourage an immediate lynch on Allomancer and encourage people to gather more information before making a final decision on a day 1 lynch.
This. This. This.In post 393, The Limit Does Not Exist wrote: Where are your reads? Your pushes? Your attempts to engage literally anyone?
Also honestly if yourIn post 395, The Limit Does Not Exist wrote:Okay now I’m riled up so holding off on vegetable mode to reply to this.In post 392, SausasaurusRex wrote:I don’t think Eve’s content has got any better, and I would prefer to lynch her than lynch Allomancer. However, I would still like to wait a little before we do so, in order to gather more information for later days and for day 1. My point in 371 was to discourage an immediate lynch on Allomancer and encourage people to gather more information before making a final decision on a day 1 lynch.
Allomancer is no longer at L-1. Why are you still so worried about him getting lynched?
- Smarter