In post 2947, Aloratom wrote:Never mind. I got it.In post 2945, Aloratom wrote:I'm not sure of the context or significance of this. Both parts.
Cryptic. For someone who wants to lead with the defense ofIn post 2948, Aloratom wrote:Both parts.
In post 2947, Aloratom wrote:Never mind. I got it.In post 2945, Aloratom wrote:I'm not sure of the context or significance of this. Both parts.
Cryptic. For someone who wants to lead with the defense ofIn post 2948, Aloratom wrote:Both parts.
Yes, I believe so. How this changes the situation based on our reads, I don't think it does.In post 2951, eyestott wrote:Hold up, game theory talk
Am I correct in this assumption:
In LyLo, if town votes town, the mafia can just pile on and hammer the town, winning the game.
So if two people have voted eachother, and no one has hammered either of them for days, that pair must not be TvT
Is this accurate?
I didn't agree with his conclusion. I just agreed that I was looking at the votes wrong. I think that's obvious. Last night I said "Taly, Paragon, please don't hammer me yet." I was thinking that Eyestott and Churros were voting me, not you and Churros.In post 2949, Taly wrote:lmfao, so in lylo, you take the perspective of the FIRST of 5 people that holds your hand to a conclusion, and now you say "this is the correct viewpoint" when it's not suspecting you as scum?
Paragon, after this game is over we'll have a talk.In post 2962, Paragon wrote:Taly + Churros 75%
Aloratom + eyestott 25%
is where I'm at. These will probably change when I can finally read and ISO people tomorrow. Looking forward to it!