You can still talk to her if she's dead.In post 4022, Fahrenheit wrote:honestly, if we don't earn enough to live the poison from events today, i'm going to just ask to be lynched. i'm not playing this game without Key.
-Smart
You can still talk to her if she's dead.In post 4022, Fahrenheit wrote:honestly, if we don't earn enough to live the poison from events today, i'm going to just ask to be lynched. i'm not playing this game without Key.
Oh, is this true? Then okay, I'll retract that.In post 4025, Sword of Damocles wrote:You can still talk to her if she's dead.In post 4022, Fahrenheit wrote:honestly, if we don't earn enough to live the poison from events today, i'm going to just ask to be lynched. i'm not playing this game without Key.
-Smart
-SmartIn post 2, Superb Subtlety wrote:If a head of a hydra were to die, they may communiate with their alive partner
In post 4002, Flavortown wrote:In post 3987, GeorgeBailey wrote:I think i'm 180ing my SR on Searchers from today's flip. Their wagon seemed to be a counter wagon withAndroidsandKurokoon it, with Androids switching for survivability.
In post 3576, Equitable Androids wrote:I’m driving so sorry if nothing in that claim post makes sense
Pedit:
VOTE: Searchers
Yes this hydra experiment is like not going super well Titus and I have very different readsAnd honestly, yeah this looks really sus so close together.In post 3588, Flavortown wrote:In post 3576, Equitable Androids wrote:I’m driving so sorry if nothing in that claim post makes sense
Pedit:
VOTE: Searchers
Yes this hydra experiment is like not going super well Titus and I have very different reads
Absolutely no clue who Searcher hydra is, but I see this is Gobb and Titus.
VOTE: Searchers
Book em, people. I’ve decided.
VOTE: FlavorTownIn post 3996, Fahrenheit wrote:Key has a day action that is publicly confirmable, and we think it could be beneficial with only two scum alive if we mass claimed. It gets even better with 1 scum alive, so if somebody could heal her it would be swell. My head has a protective, as claimed, but I am as the flavor indicates semi permanently roleblocked now. I agree, more people should discuss mass claiming.
I’m down to mass claim.
This is town points for Eddie as well.
I quoted the George one because I have a theory.
My theory is scumFemm posted in a scum thread for GB to vote me to put me to L-1 when I had a lot of votes. He went back and made sure to find a reason to vote, albeit weak and irrelevant.
So I actually do think it is scum indicative of GB.
Femm Block is scum. Mark my words.
98%.In post 4032, The Searchers wrote:Flavortown, if you are wrong about Feminist Blocc, what is your solve then? And how confident are you here (on a 0%-100% scale) about Feminist Blocc's alignment?
~Ircher
pedit: I do admit the L-1 comment was a bit out of place.
~Ircher
In post 4023, Feminist Blocc wrote:the post where i explained why we as scum would've had to be braindead to use this role on pine because he was a lover and therefore he would still flip if his lover was vigged? as opposed to using it on ANY non-lover scumbuddy who then wouldn't have flipped? ok. carry on the blind tunnel.
-D
So...?
In post 4037, Flavortown wrote:Simple solution, just target the other one Night 2.
Your reactions to the plan of targeting me is net positive towards scum as well
leaf boy: makes a baseless assumption
In post 4003, Check and Checkmate wrote:I'm very curious what exactly you mean by this.In post 3973, Black Hole Defection wrote:CO Blake's explanation of her kill once again rings to me like a confident construction of actions she thinks she can get away with.
-Blake
In post 4003, Check and Checkmate wrote:I'm very curious what exactly you mean by this.In post 3973, Black Hole Defection wrote:CO Blake's explanation of her kill once again rings to me like a confident construction of actions she thinks she can get away with.
-Blake
In post 4007, The Searchers wrote:(Revival does not at all seem like a scum ability tbh. Then again, this game is "lolbalance".)
I would direct you towards Starry Night.In post 4044, Black Hole Defection wrote:In post 4003, Check and Checkmate wrote:I'm very curious what exactly you mean by this.In post 3973, Black Hole Defection wrote:CO Blake's explanation of her kill once again rings to me like a confident construction of actions she thinks she can get away with.
-BlakeIt's part of a pattern from this whole battle. You have been fighting like Tabitha this battle: front and center, expecting to never perish and having poor prospects if that were to happen, and trying to conquer things on your own. You are usually far more like Forsythe, providing support to everybody, and highly likely to win even if you should die.
I do not think you kill Tag Team Mikoto and Kuroko here in Orange Star service. You said you had an individual hangup with them. But you always seem to view the whole battlefield, corner to corner, and will frequently emphasize that it's important to win entire battles, not skirmishes.
Why would you kill them in order to win this whole battle? If you die, your individual hangup won't matter. And you are always very aware you may die when you serve with Orange Star. If you live, you could have battled him cooperatively today to benefit us. You agreed with doubts that CO Kuroko was Black Hole late day 2, and then when night 2 started you gained a new partner who will likely be much more active and could have helped over any hangups.
With Orange Star, I would expect you to kill someone that it would help the whole battle to have dead. An example would be Tag Team Latios and Latias, who I personally would never harm but who you weren't fond of and is now proving to be awkward for our formation because being Absent With Leave while Black Hole was attacked is hard to interpret. Or you would have killed many people I would never kill, with a reason it would help us all I might personally be surprised with.
When I saw CO Farkran dead I felt like I had heard an offkey note in Forsythe's theme.
In post 4005, The Searchers wrote:In post 3981, Latias and Latios wrote:what does this mean?In post 3993, Black Hole Defection wrote:CO Ircher uses professional terminology. CO SirCakez, would you be willing to swap him for Hawke?
Give it some thought. Hawke can grant +10% to all of your units.
SC
In post 4046, Check and Checkmate wrote:I would direct you towards Starry Night.In post 4044, Black Hole Defection wrote:In post 4003, Check and Checkmate wrote:I'm very curious what exactly you mean by this.In post 3973, Black Hole Defection wrote:CO Blake's explanation of her kill once again rings to me like a confident construction of actions she thinks she can get away with.
-BlakeIt's part of a pattern from this whole battle. You have been fighting like Tabitha this battle: front and center, expecting to never perish and having poor prospects if that were to happen, and trying to conquer things on your own. You are usually far more like Forsythe, providing support to everybody, and highly likely to win even if you should die.
I do not think you kill Tag Team Mikoto and Kuroko here in Orange Star service. You said you had an individual hangup with them. But you always seem to view the whole battlefield, corner to corner, and will frequently emphasize that it's important to win entire battles, not skirmishes.
Why would you kill them in order to win this whole battle? If you die, your individual hangup won't matter. And you are always very aware you may die when you serve with Orange Star. If you live, you could have battled him cooperatively today to benefit us. You agreed with doubts that CO Kuroko was Black Hole late day 2, and then when night 2 started you gained a new partner who will likely be much more active and could have helped over any hangups.
With Orange Star, I would expect you to kill someone that it would help the whole battle to have dead. An example would be Tag Team Latios and Latias, who I personally would never harm but who you weren't fond of and is now proving to be awkward for our formation because being Absent With Leave while Black Hole was attacked is hard to interpret. Or you would have killed many people I would never kill, with a reason it would help us all I might personally be surprised with.
When I saw CO Farkran dead I felt like I had heard an offkey note in Forsythe's theme.
I had a game-long scumread on a town Bitmap, and I could never get over that read despite having correct scumreads on two scum elsewhere. When one of my other scumreads were proven correct, I could no longer see Bitmap as town without seeing the flip myself, and my play drastically shifted once it was achieved.
The exact same scenario is happening here, except the trigger is realizing that exactly two slots were criticizing my VCA findings, and the one I specifically was scumreading for that exact reason flipped scum. When the other slot is one I'm predisposed to reading as scum, it's more productive to break that tunnel entirely so I can move on rather than look elsewhere for kills.
Keep in mind that I approached the night phase fully believing that my revive would be blocked. I had no way of knowing that I could rely on that action to help keep the scumreads at bay.
-Blake