Open 778: Nightless Vanilla [Game Over!]


Forum rules
User avatar
Elements
Elements
they/she
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Elements
they/she
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3761
Joined: December 15, 2018
Pronoun: they/she
Location: Arrakis

Post Post #1050 (ISO) » Thu May 07, 2020 1:15 am

Post by Elements »

In post 1034, Green Crayons wrote:Cycle as scum doesn’t really have a motive to challenge the validity of a counter wagon to his lynch.
wait, is this pro scum!cycle?
I agree with everything Elements is posting - Papa Zito
It's scummy as fak tho - Gamma Emerald
User avatar
northsidegal
northsidegal
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
northsidegal
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 11481
Joined: August 23, 2017

Post Post #1051 (ISO) » Thu May 07, 2020 1:15 am

Post by northsidegal »

Votecount 1.32


TargetWagon
Cycle Men
(4)
Deimos27 (), humaneatingmonkey (), Isis (), Elements ()
Firebringer
(2)
votato (), Albert B. Rampage ()
NorwegianboyEE
(2)
Looker (), Green Crayons ()
Elements
(2)
Cycle Men (), Alisae ()
humaneatingmonkey
(1)
NorwegianboyEE ()
votato
(1)
Firebringer ()
Not Voting
(0)

With 12 alive, it takes 7 to lynch. The Day 1 deadline is in (expired on 2020-05-08 06:42:59).
Last edited by northsidegal on Thu May 07, 2020 1:21 am, edited 1 time in total.
wiki | modded | Newbie NewD3 Stats | scripts

things fall apart
User avatar
humaneatingmonkey
humaneatingmonkey
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
humaneatingmonkey
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 10039
Joined: June 7, 2017

Post Post #1052 (ISO) » Thu May 07, 2020 1:16 am

Post by humaneatingmonkey »

In post 1043, Alisae wrote:there is no town motivations in your actions.
town does not play this way.
this isn't really true
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #1053 (ISO) » Thu May 07, 2020 1:16 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 1002, Cycle Men wrote:?????? how does this happen in a human brain
VOTE: elements
I don’t see how this is scum material from Elements
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
humaneatingmonkey
humaneatingmonkey
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
humaneatingmonkey
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 10039
Joined: June 7, 2017

Post Post #1054 (ISO) » Thu May 07, 2020 1:16 am

Post by humaneatingmonkey »

In post 1050, Elements wrote:
In post 1034, Green Crayons wrote:Cycle as scum doesn’t really have a motive to challenge the validity of a counter wagon to his lynch.
wait, is this pro scum!cycle?
i believe it's a town!cycle consideration
User avatar
Alisae
Alisae
lolbalance
User avatar
User avatar
Alisae
lolbalance
lolbalance
Posts: 38578
Joined: October 31, 2016
Location: Cali~ (PST)
Contact:

Post Post #1055 (ISO) » Thu May 07, 2020 1:17 am

Post by Alisae »

In post 1052, humaneatingmonkey wrote:
In post 1043, Alisae wrote:there is no town motivations in your actions.
town does not play this way.
this isn't really true
town at first reaction to my scumread tries to take this opportunity to sort me and tries to understand why
what elements did was immediately say that my reads are fake and aimed to discredit me

thats a scum response imo
Discord: Alisae#8552
GTKAS
| here.
User avatar
Cycle Men
Cycle Men
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Cycle Men
Goon
Goon
Posts: 187
Joined: April 13, 2020
Location: the roads, babey

Post Post #1056 (ISO) » Thu May 07, 2020 1:17 am

Post by Cycle Men »

In post 1047, Alisae wrote:Cycle Men vote Elements
wait i already did

@nsg you missed my vote i think?


votecounts have been corrected, thanks.

-nsg
Last edited by northsidegal on Thu May 07, 2020 1:21 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Elements
Elements
they/she
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Elements
they/she
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3761
Joined: December 15, 2018
Pronoun: they/she
Location: Arrakis

Post Post #1057 (ISO) » Thu May 07, 2020 1:17 am

Post by Elements »

In post 1054, humaneatingmonkey wrote:
In post 1050, Elements wrote:
In post 1034, Green Crayons wrote:Cycle as scum doesn’t really have a motive to challenge the validity of a counter wagon to his lynch.
wait, is this pro scum!cycle?
i believe it's a town!cycle consideration
in that case scum!cycle =/= town!gc
I agree with everything Elements is posting - Papa Zito
It's scummy as fak tho - Gamma Emerald
User avatar
humaneatingmonkey
humaneatingmonkey
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
humaneatingmonkey
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 10039
Joined: June 7, 2017

Post Post #1058 (ISO) » Thu May 07, 2020 1:17 am

Post by humaneatingmonkey »

unless it's scum!NorwEE and scum!Cycle. He's more willing to get lynched and make up a reason for an alternative vote (me) than to bus NorwEE
User avatar
Elements
Elements
they/she
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Elements
they/she
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3761
Joined: December 15, 2018
Pronoun: they/she
Location: Arrakis

Post Post #1059 (ISO) » Thu May 07, 2020 1:18 am

Post by Elements »

In post 1049, Alisae wrote:
In post 1046, Elements wrote:if cycle flips scum we get gc town, ail scum, norwee town
lmao ur scum dude
cycle men as scum with me votes you by now
is this a scum slip?
I agree with everything Elements is posting - Papa Zito
It's scummy as fak tho - Gamma Emerald
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #1060 (ISO) » Thu May 07, 2020 1:19 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 1028, Alisae wrote:
In post 1024, Green Crayons wrote:VOTE: Notwegian
nah i don't agree
i don't think norwee thinks im scum but also thinks im annoying at the same time
those are conflicting thought processes
But see:
In post 878, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
In post 876, Alisae wrote:This wagon is super possible people just need to use their fucking votes
Super possible because you have 2 teammates to vote with you? Or are you referring to something else?
VOTE: Norwegian

This is a scummy attempt to discredit votes against him. First it doesn’t address the reasons for the vote. Second it attacks the vote pusher for a pretty wild conspiracy. Scum block vote for a fast lynch at the end of the game, not on D1.

In post 916, NorwegianboyEE wrote:VOTE: Humaneatingmonkey
A vote because he doesn’t like a policy lynch rationale from someone who was willing to policy lynch. Opportunistic to vote human, after cycle did, based on this thin reed and ignoring everything else.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Alisae
Alisae
lolbalance
User avatar
User avatar
Alisae
lolbalance
lolbalance
Posts: 38578
Joined: October 31, 2016
Location: Cali~ (PST)
Contact:

Post Post #1061 (ISO) » Thu May 07, 2020 1:19 am

Post by Alisae »

like
their first reaction was to discredit me instead of ask me why i scumread them.

they did it after but you ask why I scumread them first to see their answer and try to evaluate an opinion based on that answer.
Instead they came out with an opinion right away before trying to ask me why I scumread them.

Also, they're playing this angle of "Well there's no scum motivation to my play so I have to be town" to try to excuse themselves from being scummy when thats just not how it works. Because there is no town motivation in their actions either.
Discord: Alisae#8552
GTKAS
| here.
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #1062 (ISO) » Thu May 07, 2020 1:19 am

Post by Green Crayons »

Oh that’s a double vote because I had started collecting Norg posts on my phone but got distracted
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
humaneatingmonkey
humaneatingmonkey
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
humaneatingmonkey
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 10039
Joined: June 7, 2017

Post Post #1063 (ISO) » Thu May 07, 2020 1:20 am

Post by humaneatingmonkey »

In post 1028, Alisae wrote:
In post 1024, Green Crayons wrote:VOTE: Notwegian
nah i don't agree
i don't think norwee thinks im scum but also thinks im annoying at the same time
those are conflicting thought processes
this isn't really true. scum!norwee can use ate to discredit town!you as being annoying. town!norwee will say that scum!you is scummy, not annoying
User avatar
Alisae
Alisae
lolbalance
User avatar
User avatar
Alisae
lolbalance
lolbalance
Posts: 38578
Joined: October 31, 2016
Location: Cali~ (PST)
Contact:

Post Post #1064 (ISO) » Thu May 07, 2020 1:21 am

Post by Alisae »

In post 1060, Green Crayons wrote:
In post 1028, Alisae wrote:
In post 1024, Green Crayons wrote:VOTE: Notwegian
nah i don't agree
i don't think norwee thinks im scum but also thinks im annoying at the same time
those are conflicting thought processes
But see:
In post 878, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
In post 876, Alisae wrote:This wagon is super possible people just need to use their fucking votes
Super possible because you have 2 teammates to vote with you? Or are you referring to something else?
VOTE: Norwegian

This is a scummy attempt to discredit votes against him. First it doesn’t address the reasons for the vote. Second it attacks the vote pusher for a pretty wild conspiracy. Scum block vote for a fast lynch at the end of the game, not on D1.
In post 916, NorwegianboyEE wrote:VOTE: Humaneatingmonkey
A vote because he doesn’t like a policy lynch rationale from someone who was willing to policy lynch. Opportunistic to vote human, after cycle did, based on this thin reed and ignoring everything else.
Okay but its too flawed to come from scum. One of us flips town and he looks REALLY bad. Scum don't push angles like that.
Discord: Alisae#8552
GTKAS
| here.
User avatar
Cycle Men
Cycle Men
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Cycle Men
Goon
Goon
Posts: 187
Joined: April 13, 2020
Location: the roads, babey

Post Post #1065 (ISO) » Thu May 07, 2020 1:23 am

Post by Cycle Men »

human suddenly defending elements makes me feel like he never intended to push that way in the first place and is just doing it for the sake of hiding associatives
User avatar
Elements
Elements
they/she
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Elements
they/she
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3761
Joined: December 15, 2018
Pronoun: they/she
Location: Arrakis

Post Post #1066 (ISO) » Thu May 07, 2020 1:23 am

Post by Elements »

ok so I'm thinking Ali, cycle, someone not currently active as the scum team.
I agree with everything Elements is posting - Papa Zito
It's scummy as fak tho - Gamma Emerald
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #1067 (ISO) » Thu May 07, 2020 1:24 am

Post by Green Crayons »

He’s too scummy to be scum?

Come on.

I’m still trying to mull over Elements.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Cycle Men
Cycle Men
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Cycle Men
Goon
Goon
Posts: 187
Joined: April 13, 2020
Location: the roads, babey

Post Post #1068 (ISO) » Thu May 07, 2020 1:24 am

Post by Cycle Men »

In post 1065, Cycle Men wrote:human suddenly defending elements makes me feel like he never intended to push that way in the first place and is just doing it for the sake of hiding associatives
was just*
User avatar
Alisae
Alisae
lolbalance
User avatar
User avatar
Alisae
lolbalance
lolbalance
Posts: 38578
Joined: October 31, 2016
Location: Cali~ (PST)
Contact:

Post Post #1069 (ISO) » Thu May 07, 2020 1:24 am

Post by Alisae »

In post 1063, humaneatingmonkey wrote:
In post 1028, Alisae wrote:
In post 1024, Green Crayons wrote:VOTE: Notwegian
nah i don't agree
i don't think norwee thinks im scum but also thinks im annoying at the same time
those are conflicting thought processes
this isn't really true. scum!norwee can use ate to discredit town!you as being annoying. town!norwee will say that scum!you is scummy, not annoying
he's not using AtE.
He is saying that he thinks im scum but also i am annoying him. Like, I basically cornered him and he doesn't know how to react, and acknowledges that I am annoying because deep down in this mind, he thinks that he could be wrong, but he's scumreading me because im just pushing him.

I'm using a lot of words to describe what is essentially a self-defense mechanism, because I know sometimes I can act fairly similarly as well.
I encountered Norwee act this way before and when he did act this way, he was likely town.

Him calling me annoying and asking me to stop just doesn't make sense from a scum PoV there. As scum he just continues to discredit me because he would probably aim to maintain a consistent stance on me.
That post in of itself is an inconsitentcy and I don't think he makes it as scum.
It feels genuine.
Discord: Alisae#8552
GTKAS
| here.
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #1070 (ISO) » Thu May 07, 2020 1:25 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 1064, Alisae wrote:One of us flips town and he looks REALLY bad. Scu
Anything to survive a day.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Elements
Elements
they/she
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Elements
they/she
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3761
Joined: December 15, 2018
Pronoun: they/she
Location: Arrakis

Post Post #1071 (ISO) » Thu May 07, 2020 1:25 am

Post by Elements »

Don't want to comment on your scum slip Ali?
I agree with everything Elements is posting - Papa Zito
It's scummy as fak tho - Gamma Emerald
User avatar
Alisae
Alisae
lolbalance
User avatar
User avatar
Alisae
lolbalance
lolbalance
Posts: 38578
Joined: October 31, 2016
Location: Cali~ (PST)
Contact:

Post Post #1072 (ISO) » Thu May 07, 2020 1:25 am

Post by Alisae »

In post 1067, Green Crayons wrote:He’s too scummy to be scum?

Come on.

I’m still trying to mull over Elements.
not too scummy to be scummy
the logic just doesn't work and is faulty

its not rational and its chaotic and reactional, and its probably just town imo
Discord: Alisae#8552
GTKAS
| here.
User avatar
Alisae
Alisae
lolbalance
User avatar
User avatar
Alisae
lolbalance
lolbalance
Posts: 38578
Joined: October 31, 2016
Location: Cali~ (PST)
Contact:

Post Post #1073 (ISO) » Thu May 07, 2020 1:26 am

Post by Alisae »

In post 1071, Elements wrote:Don't want to comment on your scum slip Ali?
i mean
anything is possible if you lie
Discord: Alisae#8552
GTKAS
| here.
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #1074 (ISO) » Thu May 07, 2020 1:26 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 1066, Elements wrote:ok so I'm thinking Ali, cycle, someone not currently active as the scum team.
Why Ali?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Locked