With 12 alive, it takes 7 to lynch. The Day 1 deadline is in (expired on 2020-05-08 06:42:59).
In post 853, Alisae wrote:VOTE: fire
for now mostly to try to make EoD more interesting
I just really don't care for this exchange.
Ali, if you wanted a cycle hammer, why didn't you just vote cycle? FB had already said he was wanting to hammer cycle and so you could have likely had the cycle lynch right then. Instead you voted for FB.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
With 12 alive, it takes 7 to lynch. The Day 1 deadline is in (expired on 2020-05-08 06:42:59).
In post 853, Alisae wrote:VOTE: fire
for now mostly to try to make EoD more interesting
I just really don't care for this exchange.
Ali, if you wanted a cycle hammer, why didn't you just vote cycle? FB had already said he was wanting to hammer cycle and so you could have likely had the cycle lynch right then. Instead you voted for FB.
i voted fire there because if I couldn't decide a lynch, then I could at least make an attempt to tie the wagons to try to get information from that, tho that kind of just ended up falling apart and not happening I think
But I want you out of the game after the last page. You prove that you're impossible to sort, and I think you're better flipped than alive.
so you're saying half my scumteam was already on my wagon before your troupe turned back on me
In post 914, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Feels like Alisae just instructed their team to vote me based on the last page alone.
This is super weird. I thought Norweg came up with the idea that the Ail + HME + Isis were a scum group doing a group shift away from cycle to Norwegian. But it was actually Cycle in post 913--literally one minute before Norweg's 914--referring to "your troupe."
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
I actually can't tell who the "troupe" in 913 is supposed to be if not the Ali/HME/Isis trio, but then them "turn[ing] back on me" doesn't really make sense.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Nope, sorry, it does make sense. HME and Isis had returned to cycle by 913.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Okay I'm going to take a break but the cycle-Ali-Norwegian interaction in the 36-41 page range is just so damned weird. Ali is trying hard to not lynch cycle but trying to lynch Norweg. Norweg is trying hard to get other people to not lynch cycle by voting human. Ali and cycle are having a biting back and forth, and meanwhile Norweg is 1+ing the Ali burns.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
In post 961, humaneatingmonkey wrote:I want to be clear. I'm not finding Looker, GC, Elements, and NorwEE as hard to sort. I am sorting them as likely scum. But I can be very wrong, and I think a flipped Cycle Men will help me be more right.
The only reason I didn't have Cycle Men as my primary lynch option earlier was the lack of counterwagon during that period. However, I can see merit in Deimos' push against him. But now I see that the paranoia around it is outweighed by the uncertainty Cycle Men will bring me later in the game.
So Cycle Men it is.
you can use the words policy lynch
you want to policy lynch me
There's a lot of posts I could quote
but I'm really really wondering whether the way Cycle Men treated monkey so differently from me for very similar reasons for voting him is a No Parity result between monkey and me
In post 1334, Green Crayons wrote:Okay I'm going to take a break but the cycle-Ali-Norwegian interaction in the 36-41 page range is just so damned weird. Ali is trying hard to not lynch cycle but trying to lynch Norweg. Norweg is trying hard to get other people to not lynch cycle by voting human. Ali and cycle are having a biting back and forth, and meanwhile Norweg is 1+ing the Ali burns.
quote or links please
Guard your honor. Let your reputation fall where it will. And outlive the bastards.
"You are the Joker of mafia players" - Oversoul
"last time I was scum with Firebringer
his first post in the scum PT was "yes I rolled scum!"
I decided to post "haha just don't post that in the main thread", but to get up to date on the main thread first.
His first post in the main thread was "yes I rolled scum!" -popsofctown
"You are the Joker of mafia players" - Oversoul
"last time I was scum with Firebringer
his first post in the scum PT was "yes I rolled scum!"
I decided to post "haha just don't post that in the main thread", but to get up to date on the main thread first.
His first post in the main thread was "yes I rolled scum!" -popsofctown
"You are the Joker of mafia players" - Oversoul
"last time I was scum with Firebringer
his first post in the scum PT was "yes I rolled scum!"
I decided to post "haha just don't post that in the main thread", but to get up to date on the main thread first.
His first post in the main thread was "yes I rolled scum!" -popsofctown
"You are the Joker of mafia players" - Oversoul
"last time I was scum with Firebringer
his first post in the scum PT was "yes I rolled scum!"
I decided to post "haha just don't post that in the main thread", but to get up to date on the main thread first.
His first post in the main thread was "yes I rolled scum!" -popsofctown