my words are very simple and there's not some hidden meaning behind them.In post 1770, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:Because t sounded to me like you were saying my read shouldn’t have changed. To which I was wondering if you thought they didn’t naturally change all the time.
Ok then. So was yours.In post 1775, Nero Cain wrote:my words are very simple and there's not some hidden meaning behind them.In post 1770, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:Because t sounded to me like you were saying my read shouldn’t have changed. To which I was wondering if you thought they didn’t naturally change all the time.
ur question was dumb
Sure, but how about not lynching Jester and ending the game?In post 1774, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:???? I’m not claiming anything but I will.In post 1772, Nero Cain wrote:I think I know what she's claiming and it's dumb.In post 1766, davesaz wrote:There are multiple possible answers. Despite what you may thing I'm not settled on which.In post 1761, EspeciallyTheLies wrote: Yeah that’s fine and all but do you understand what I’m doing rn?
I’m a vanilla townie. I do nothing except vote and die. My vote is doing nothing. So I’ll die instead. How do people not get how much information can be gained by lynching me today??? Over half the playerlist has made a firm stance on me one way or the other. Getting a confirmation of my alignment means you can take that data and use it to figure out other people’s alignments. FAR MORE BENEFIT. How is that hard to understand??
Doctors, plural, but yes. Also keep in mind we have a claimed infection-immune townie who thus cannot be infected; mafia leaving that slot alive means that they always have someone immune to being infected. (Like I said, No Lynch/Voted is half-BP, half-IC. For scum to get rid of the conftown, they need to spend one of their only two factional nightkills on the slot, something I am fine with since it'd mean they only have one left to take care of anti-infection players.In post 1607, Auro wrote:The kills should be for the doc, I believe
) Honestly, don't do this. It hurts. There are better slots to vote such as:
No I’m dead serious.
There is literally no other person on the playerlist who has more firm reads on it or reactions to their posts than I do.In post 1782, Quick wrote:Honestly, don't do this. It hurts. There are better slots to vote such as:
Spoiler:
I agree.In post 1614, davesaz wrote:BTW 50's posts that are happening now are town-indicative.
Plot twist: I'm Scum.In post 1786, mastina wrote:I agree.In post 1614, davesaz wrote:BTW 50's posts that are happening now are town-indicative.
So that narrows down the probable lurker-scum pool to 2/3; not bad odds to be honest.
Within {Aristophanes, Creature, Jake}, pretty sure there's that 66% chance to hit scum and with those odds, would be all too happy to join a wagon on any of them.
Probably Ari > Creature>Jake though if I were left with a choice between the three. That being, Aristophanes most suspicious, Creature behind him, Jake loosely at the Creature level but familiarity with Creature makes me want to lynch Creature first.
Going to eat either the scum nightkill or a scum infection for sure at some point due to how much of a threat she's posing.In post 1616, Auro wrote:What's your take on Mastina?
MissLynch, now is your opportunity.In post 1784, Covid 19 wrote:
For the record, while I don't think FL is scum, if he active lurks like this, I'd be okay with a policy lynch on his slot just in case there's the chance he was scum.In post 1647, Flavor Leaf wrote:66 pages... I’m never catching up
) omg no. It’s not dumb at all. How are you not getting this? How would lynching anyone else be more beneficial?? My value as VT is in my death.In post 1787, Nero Cain wrote:If you are town then sacrificing yourself seems kinda dumb, no? Chance this is justateso ppl town read u for it.
Indeed.In post 1687, davesaz wrote:Ari's posting is sociable, but no real content. I too am working and my availability will be highly variable. Today has been an unusually good day for posting.
With the way this game is currently going, the high number of lurkers, the high number of non-serious players and the very low ratio of scum to town, scum lynch ain’t happening today. That’s pretty much a given. So if we are going to lynch town anyway we should be going for the highest info lynch we can and you cannot argue that mine doesn’t fit the bill.In post 1792, davesaz wrote:ETL, two of the possible answers are town trying to get out of the game quickly and scum trying to AtE themselves out of lynch contention.
There are plenty more, but those are the big ones.
I strongly disagree with martyrdom. We lynch scum if possible.
Nope, never even remotely. Never been something that has ever factored in, ever.In post 1697, davesaz wrote:Do you have a proactive > reactive bias in how your read people in general?In post 1694, mastina wrote:ETL's content this game has looked town without actually doing anything town.
*sigh*