mini 2140: partition (this is over)

[Ame]

speaking of sin

[dsjstr]

[Ame]

ok that's enough procrastination, I have a paper to write

[Hoctac]

Good luck!

[dsjstr]

oops imagine that got one of these

Spoiler:

[Hoctac]

So, Doro, why'd you go for group 3 over 2? There's 2 unknowns in each from your PoV.

[dsjstr]

e

[Hoctac]

Ah, I see. Why didn't you just say so earlier

[dsjstr]

VOTE: group 3

You are voting your own group?

I was also thinking of voting for group 3 tbh

Group 1 is too risky and if there is 1 member in group 2 then even without reads it would be a 50/50 we get them the next day.

Doro!

You mentioned you would rather vote for group 2 over 3 since 2 will only have 1 member at max. But from your perspective, you know you're town, so should group 2 and 3 both have an equal number of potential scum (2)?

That came at a time while 1-1-1 was being discussed and at the time I was thinking if that was case then group 3 would be the safest bet.

[Morning Tweet]

a haiku about clidd

clidd, the detective
he takes a sip of his tea
it’s quite delicious

im not sure if the last line is cheating or not

[Morning Tweet]

am i supposed to know what hoctac and ame have been alluding to for 70% of the game and im missing it, or is everyone else also confused

[Hoctac]

VOTE: group 3

You are voting your own group?

I was also thinking of voting for group 3 tbh

Group 1 is too risky and if there is 1 member in group 2 then even without reads it would be a 50/50 we get them the next day.

Doro!

You mentioned you would rather vote for group 2 over 3 since 2 will only have 1 member at max. But from your perspective, you know you're town, so should group 2 and 3 both have an equal number of potential scum (2)?

That came at a time while 1-1-1 was being discussed and at the time I was thinking if that was case then group 3 would be the safest bet.

Why though? You know you're town, so both group 2 and 3 have 2 people that could be scum. Using that logic, group 2 is better to lynch since you know you're killing yourself (town) in group 3.

[dsjstr]

I don't get it, Doro. If there's 1 member in group 2 and we lynch it, there'll be 2 alive tomorrow.

If they went 1-1-1 which would just be a mistake for the mafia then there would be 2 members alive D2 no matter which group we choose. Since there are only two members in group 2 that leaves two suspects to choose from. The fact that no one else

sees going 1-1-1 as a bad move makes me think the mafia would have gone for it.

I also said this a few mins later.

[Cat Scratch Fever]

am i supposed to know what hoctac and ame have been alluding to for 70% of the game and im missing it, or is everyone else also confused

nope I'm confused too

Are you still scum on Hoctac, Ame?

[Hoctac]

a haiku about clidd

clidd, the detective
he takes a sip of his tea
it’s quite delicious

im not sure if the last line is cheating or not

That's beautiful. Change "his tea" to "coffee" and it'd be perfect (clidd's a huge fan).

VOTE: Group 2

You have earned my vote.

[dsjstr]

It would be a 50/50 even without any reads, but now I really don't think it is 1-1-1

[Hoctac]

I think it is 1-0-2 or 0-1-2!

Why not 0-2-1 or 1-2-0?

[Cat Scratch Fever]

"

Scum in 1-1-1 would specifically want groups 1 > 3 > 2 to be lynched in that order.

"

Why ?

Lynching group 1 would instantly win scum the game

I guess the difference between groups 2 and 3 aren't

that

big, but group 3 would mean eliminating an extra townie compared to group 2.

"

Forget the specific partition for a second, I've noticed that you've basically explained away scum!Albert in every configuration and it doesn't make sense to me. For instance, in the case where the groups are 2-1-0, you say this configuration is too risky for scum in group 2 because group 3 players don't seem "weak verbally." The players in group 3 aren't any stronger/townier than the players in group 2. In fact, I would say the players in group 3 are probably the least known players in the list and have already been attracting a lot of scrutiny

."

Do you consider Albert to be a verbally strong player ?

I haven't played with him, but based on what I've seen so far, I think he's lynchbaity than the players in group 3 if that's what you mean. He has proposed that we lynch group 1 and at least two people are townreading him for it

[Cat Scratch Fever]

oops I accidentally cut out the header but that was in response to clidd's 216

[Cat Scratch Fever]

Why would he be? Hoctac is clearly not the same thing as Hectic. Are you dyslexic?

hey I had the same thought

[Cat Scratch Fever]

Doro is town btw

Why?

[Cat Scratch Fever]

Do you have any completed scumgames dsjstr?

[Hoctac]

I knew you would ask me, Cat Scratch Fever, which is why I already preemptively answered you in 252.

[Hoctac]

Do you have any completed scumgames dsjstr?

https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?t=81962
https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=83&t=82403

[Adorable]

I start to wonder why did mafia put 8 players in group 1, 2 players in group 2, and 3 players in group 3. It takes 7 to hammer and there's no way group 1 will get hammered by the other groups for not having enough players. Mafia want to avoid getting lynched which will be more likely there is definitely scum in group 1.

VOTE: Group 1