Mini Normal 2141: The World of Tomorrow [Game over!]

[iDanyboy]

VOTE: votato

Sheep me and I will shepherd, nobody is on a wagon as good as this one

Shepherd me.
VOTE: votato

[CantHateAPuppy]

[VP Baltar]

VOTE: votato

Sheep me and I will shepherd, nobody is on a wagon as good as this one

Shepherd me.
VOTE: votato

I support this vote. Can we hear your reasoning though?

[NoPowerOverMe]

NoPowerOverMe
CantLynchAPuppy
Quick
Nauci

VP Baltar
votato

Atarashi
Blair

not enough content: iDannyboy, Gammagooey, ready2rock, mavsfan, PeterPan

[VP Baltar]

Nauci

I'd be interested in hearing more on your reasoning for this read.

[NoPowerOverMe]

Nauci

I'd be interested in hearing more on your reasoning for this read.

She seems to be more genuine than manipulative.

[VP Baltar]

Any particular posts or moments where you feel that way?

[NoPowerOverMe]

Any particular posts or moments where you feel that way?

Where she queestions her read of Blair.

[Blair]

VOTE: votato

Sheep me and I will shepherd, nobody is on a wagon as good as this one

These are two weak tells, and they don't match. I think I've caught you pretending to scum humt

Are you confident you have a large enough sample size to conclude that Votato only pretends to scum hunt as scum?

[Blair]

I had Votato in my low hanging fruit farmer pile as null.

[Blair]

Honestly nothing has really caught my eye for a while now, starting to wonder if most of the scum aren't talking right now.

[VP Baltar]

I had Votato in my low hanging fruit farmer pile as null.

Reason or gut?

[Blair]

I had Votato in my low hanging fruit farmer pile as null.

Reason or gut?

When I look through his ISO, I see him jumping on lots of easy "gotchas" in all directions, all the way back to RVS, so I don't think him pushing two weak scumtells that don't fit together especially well in this particular case means he's up to something, so to speak - I think it's just how he interacts with the thread.

[votato]

I had Votato in my low hanging fruit farmer pile as null.

Reason or gut?

When I look through his ISO, I see him jumping on lots of easy "gotchas" in all directions, all the way back to RVS, so I don't think him pushing two weak scumtells that don't fit together especially well in this particular case means he's up to something, so to speak - I think it's just how he interacts with the thread.

This. It's too early to have good reads so I'm gonna hop around for a bit and point things out. By page 100 i should have a good grasp. It's not like anything anyone else has said is very substantive. It's page 10 or whatever.

[Quick]

@VP, how do we know you are not pushing miss lynch bait?

[VP Baltar]

@VP, how do we know you are not pushing miss lynch bait?

I don't even know Miss Lynch...

I kid, I kid.

I think votato is what many might call a "wedge issue." I'm not much of a fan of the poor logic or "fuck you" reaction to being questioned. It feels like inexperienced scum to me ... which is low hanging fruit, but the delicious kind. That being said, I can see people reading that as town or scum...hence why I'm trying to get people on the record on votato. At the very least, I think this conversation will be fruitful for town later. (Much more so than the 'everyone have a single vote on your favorite scum' status we were at in the last vote count.)

[Quick]

Just for donkey:

[CantHateAPuppy]

VOTE: votato

Sheep me and I will shepherd, nobody is on a wagon as good as this one

These are two weak tells, and they don't match. I think I've caught you pretending to scum humt

Are you confident you have a large enough sample size to conclude that Votato only pretends to scum hunt as scum?

Sure, let's assume votato makes weak reads that contradict, then flails while answering weak questions about them, as town. Let's assume this [not that it's all that generous]

So what odds is votato scum? Random chance? A little better than chance? if so i would love to hear that u have found a vote better than random chance, double if ur vote is better than mine if we make some generous assumptions for it too

[Quick]

NoPowerOverMe
CantLynchAPuppy
Quick
Nauci

VP Baltar
votato

Atarashi
Blair

not enough content: iDannyboy, Gammagooey, ready2rock, mavsfan, PeterPan

How do you group those two together?

[Blair]

Ok, so... I antagonized him in 258 and 259 and he chose to see past that and agree with a more nuanced interpretation of what I said as a defense of himself.

Honestly, I expected him to lash out at me the way he lashed out at Puppy.

VOTE: Votato

Now that you've demonstrated you only reach for low hanging fruit sometimes, I'm liking Puppy's case more.

Thoughts?

[Quick]

Ok, so... I antagonized him in 258 and 259 and he chose to see past that and agree with a more nuanced interpretation of what I said as a defense of himself.

Honestly, I expected him to lash out at me the way he lashed out at Puppy.

VOTE: Votato

Now that you've demonstrated you only reach for low hanging fruit sometimes, I'm liking Puppy's case more.

Thoughts?

Okay...

VOTE: Blair

Feel free to ask me for my reasoning.

[Blair]

You'll need to provide it if you actually want other people to vote with you.

Since you didn't, I'm far more interested in why that is than anything else.

[CantHateAPuppy]

Ok, so... I antagonized him in 258 and 259 and he chose to see past that and agree with a more nuanced interpretation of what I said as a defense of himself.

Honestly, I expected him to lash out at me the way he lashed out at Puppy.

VOTE: Votato

Now that you've demonstrated you only reach for low hanging fruit sometimes, I'm liking Puppy's case more.

Thoughts?

Okay...

VOTE: Blair

Feel free to ask me for my reasoning.

Nah, not interested, it's probably not that good anyways

if u vote just to have people ask u for an explanation, isn't that just a reaction test to see who takes the bait? Means ur vote can't be all that good can it

[Quick]

Ok, so... I antagonized him in 258 and 259 and he chose to see past that and agree with a more nuanced interpretation of what I said as a defense of himself.

Honestly, I expected him to lash out at me the way he lashed out at Puppy.

VOTE: Votato

Now that you've demonstrated you only reach for low hanging fruit sometimes, I'm liking Puppy's case more.

Thoughts?

Okay...

VOTE: Blair

Feel free to ask me for my reasoning.

Nah, not interested, it's probably not that good anyways

if u vote just to have people ask u for an explanation, isn't that just a reaction test to see who takes the bait? Means ur vote can't be all that good can it

Blair has been "off" this game if they are as good as you say they are. Disagree?

[Gammagooey]

Ok, so... I antagonized him in 258 and 259 and he chose to see past that and agree with a more nuanced interpretation of what I said as a defense of himself.

Honestly, I expected him to lash out at me the way he lashed out at Puppy.

I personally missed the bite of #258 and saw it as straight-faced the first time I read it, what was your thought process behind thinking he'd attack you for it?
I think votato's playing objectively a bit badly but I don't see it as more likely to come from scum than town, the 'flailing' just seems like him being irritated and reacting to Puppy's vote.