In post 324, VP Baltar wrote:
And my reasoning was him accusing Blair of jumping on a Puppy "wagon"...which was just my RVS vote (see above). It wasn't a wagon. Felt like a scummy way to characterize it at the time, so I moved my vote. Since then, I've gained some good reads by continuing push people and votato to take more concrete positions.
All right, thanks. Think i forgot the reason u voted and got the wrong impression from that one post out of context.
However, if i don't have u as scum i don't have u as town either. i think u're being a little passive, not in a scummie sense, but i think u are a bigger blank to me than some other posters. Help me out. Do u have a second strong scumread besides votato?
See! That wasn't so hard. U can speak in clear sentences just like the rest of us
In post 337, mavsfan41 wrote:
@Puppy: you have a series of posts 229-231 that was the inception of the Votato interaction (231). Your 229 had a question posed to NPOM. I think the votato read only started cause votato responded first and that’s naturally where the conversation went. Since the 229 post, NPOM has gone quiet and hasn’t actually responded. Wouldn’t this be more suspicious and possibly be seen as NPOM letting another read develop while staying away? Basically what I’m saying is that I think town!votato is more likely to respond where scum would stay back and let something pass.
No, this is a good point, i had thought about this earlier, i think NPOM is "skimming" a little to invent a term, idk. But i think right now i have hands full looking into votato and all that came from that. Help me out here and develop this like of thought please