Okay!In post 47, HoldenGolden wrote:Hoctac vote Tuxedo
VOTE: Tuxedo
Why dont you like word salad?In post 42, DkKoba wrote:Too much word salad 2/10In post 26, Kilgamayan wrote:imo what to do with someone that doesn't want to hammer depends on how they handle the situation. Someone that goes "no I'm townreading them and that's that" and shoves their fingers in their ears can be sent to the guillotine the next day because that reeks of scum wanting to avoid hammering a supersaint. I'd be substantially more willing to give leeway to someone that goes "I'm townreading this person for A B C reasons and I think the case against them doesn't fly for X Y Z reasons" and actually makes an effort to dissuade the lynch onto someone else they find scummier. (Assuming their argumentation isn't all bunk, of course.)
VOTE: kilga
Still not accepting your lying ways.In post 49, Tuxedo Mask wrote:Compromise, we both vote Hoctac.In post 47, HoldenGolden wrote:Hoctac vote Tuxedo
VOTE: Hoctac
pee pee poo poo let me leadIn post 42, DkKoba wrote:Too much word salad 2/10In post 26, Kilgamayan wrote:imo what to do with someone that doesn't want to hammer depends on how they handle the situation. Someone that goes "no I'm townreading them and that's that" and shoves their fingers in their ears can be sent to the guillotine the next day because that reeks of scum wanting to avoid hammering a supersaint. I'd be substantially more willing to give leeway to someone that goes "I'm townreading this person for A B C reasons and I think the case against them doesn't fly for X Y Z reasons" and actually makes an effort to dissuade the lynch onto someone else they find scummier. (Assuming their argumentation isn't all bunk, of course.)
VOTE: kilga
Hoctac lock town according to EA
You Holden! Remember, you said 'we'll stage a joke fight right at the start to distance.' I'm so confused now.In post 53, HoldenGolden wrote:Still not accepting your lying ways.In post 49, Tuxedo Mask wrote:Compromise, we both vote Hoctac.In post 47, HoldenGolden wrote:Hoctac vote Tuxedo
VOTE: Hoctac
Who's your scum buddy Tuxedo?
Is it just that he took too long to say what he meant? Because it feels like a natural evolution of the discussion we were having.In post 55, DkKoba wrote:pee pee poo poo let me leadIn post 42, DkKoba wrote:Too much word salad 2/10In post 26, Kilgamayan wrote:imo what to do with someone that doesn't want to hammer depends on how they handle the situation. Someone that goes "no I'm townreading them and that's that" and shoves their fingers in their ears can be sent to the guillotine the next day because that reeks of scum wanting to avoid hammering a supersaint. I'd be substantially more willing to give leeway to someone that goes "I'm townreading this person for A B C reasons and I think the case against them doesn't fly for X Y Z reasons" and actually makes an effort to dissuade the lynch onto someone else they find scummier. (Assuming their argumentation isn't all bunk, of course.)
VOTE: kilga
I'm sorry, I don't know what you mean. What about that is alignment indicative?In post 58, DkKoba wrote:Sure we can go with that. More like tl dr materiał that prompted me to vote them
I thought you were saying something about the word salad was alignment indicative because you voted them. It now occurs to me you may have been joking.In post 60, DkKoba wrote:what of any current post is AI?
OooooooooIn post 62, HoldenGolden wrote:Its rhetorical. You clearly arent reading the our PT then since I want to buddy Hoctac. Bad scum buddy!You Holden! Remember, you said 'we'll stage a joke fight right at the start to distance.' I'm so confused now.
i'm Sometimes Not Shit at math, no promises though. i'm not sure what math has to do with it, past the 25%-50%-25% odds of our setup?In post 67, DkKoba wrote:lets take a look at probabilities and such firstly: its going to be a lot to take in, so any help with this would be appreciated from anyone talented with math.
what do you mean by the bolded?In post 67, DkKoba wrote:we should eliminate the extreme points because frankly ,we dont want to be in aposition where there's a unique power role missing(well, other than the blank vigs. they are kinda stupid).
why would this be helpful?In post 67, DkKoba wrote:my brain hurts but essentially a vig that successfully shoots a supersaint can claim, especially when a bomb dies and no one else does.
either no bomb or no supersaintIn post 70, Night 3 Roses wrote:i'm Sometimes Not Shit at math, no promises though. i'm not sure what math has to do with it, past the 25%-50%-25% odds of our setup?In post 67, DkKoba wrote:lets take a look at probabilities and such firstly: its going to be a lot to take in, so any help with this would be appreciated from anyone talented with math.
what do you mean by the bolded?In post 67, DkKoba wrote:we should eliminate the extreme points because frankly ,we dont want to be in aposition where there's a unique power role missing(well, other than the blank vigs. they are kinda stupid).
why would this be helpful?In post 67, DkKoba wrote:my brain hurts but essentially a vig that successfully shoots a supersaint can claim, especially when a bomb dies and no one else does.
-D