How so? The mafia pt joke with Tuxedo?In post 98, DkKoba wrote:anyways I thinkholden wifom'dtoo much so i think i changed my mind about voting them VOTE: holden
Believe that is four votes on me BTW
How so? The mafia pt joke with Tuxedo?In post 98, DkKoba wrote:anyways I thinkholden wifom'dtoo much so i think i changed my mind about voting them VOTE: holden
In post 94, DkKoba wrote:I'm just going to throw out a few notes on what I think.
1.) no claims d1 because variance in PRs is enough for scum to hide in either pile without really being able to pin it down, however, they cannot both hide in 1 pile without being confirmed to both be in that pile. (at least I think so? I need to go over the possibilities. at least theres certain cases where it would become immediately apparent).
2.) n1 analysis will be important if there are obvious non-scum kills.
3.)idk bomb mechs but we can setup a slot code to make sure vigs don't all target the same person and we don't gain any info from a death. also don't want all vigs to suicide onto a single bomb if thats a thing LOL
In post 99, HoldenGolden wrote:How does this confirm anything by having them shoot a SS (which we have to know exists) that scum would be forced to shoot or gungho on their lynch to avoid being placed in the hammer spot? How would you coordinate that without the risk of mafia simply expending their rb ability on the claimed vig?In post 95, DkKoba wrote:
this is an example situation where vig can self confirm themselves as a real vig, and thus can "claim" a kill for example if they are being lynched. (and this be clear). this is a niche case but its SOMETHING we can utilize if it happens, plus the vig in questiion would know they can aim to kill scum.
I think the only way to "confirm" a claim like this would be post the vig shot, but nothing stops vigs stacking up on one target unless we come up with a system for it.
Also lol, mafia shooting the bomb
Then would you like to answer post 100 then?In post 104, DkKoba wrote:I don't think that's important right now.
i do believe yes that is considered wifom.In post 100, HoldenGolden wrote:How so? The mafia pt joke with Tuxedo?In post 98, DkKoba wrote:anyways I thinkholden wifom'dtoo much so i think i changed my mind about voting them VOTE: holden
Believe that is four votes on me BTW
omgusIn post 42, DkKoba wrote:Too much word salad 2/10In post 26, Kilgamayan wrote:imo what to do with someone that doesn't want to hammer depends on how they handle the situation. Someone that goes "no I'm townreading them and that's that" and shoves their fingers in their ears can be sent to the guillotine the next day because that reeks of scum wanting to avoid hammering a supersaint. I'd be substantially more willing to give leeway to someone that goes "I'm townreading this person for A B C reasons and I think the case against them doesn't fly for X Y Z reasons" and actually makes an effort to dissuade the lynch onto someone else they find scummier. (Assuming their argumentation isn't all bunk, of course.)
VOTE: kilga
my ego is in the on position right now there is no asking me to unvote right nowIn post 105, Hoctac wrote:Are you feeling pressured by all the votes on you, Holden? I could ask people to unvote if that's the case.
Nah I've grown accustom to my starpower pushing me into the lynch candidacy quite early.In post 105, Hoctac wrote:Are you feeling pressured by all the votes on you, Holden? I could ask people to unvote if that's the case.
Yes it is. You stated it is too much implying the manner in which I did it exceeds the daily threshold of town allowed wifom. So why does that push me more into coming from a mafia perspective rather than a townie jesting?In post 107, DkKoba wrote:i do believe yes that is considered wifom.In post 100, HoldenGolden wrote:How so? The mafia pt joke with Tuxedo?In post 98, DkKoba wrote:anyways I thinkholden wifom'dtoo much so i think i changed my mind about voting them VOTE: holden
Believe that is four votes on me BTW
No I do not.In post 112, DkKoba wrote:there's no "town allowed wifom". town doesn't need to wifom that they are scum because they are not scum and wouldn't have any wine. do you see where I'mgoing with this?
Yes a scum mason claim basically.In post 114, DkKoba wrote:u are quite hung up on that huh.
well maybe u should note that you also fakeclaimed a role(even if it doesn't exist)(which i consider wifom) as well.
and maybe also note i'm not calling for your lynch since you seem to be toeing the line of overreaction but rather see u as a good starting point for beginning the gamesolve.
Talk about awkward.In post 69, ceejayvinoya wrote:My vote on Holden stays. Most awkward guy so far.
I'm keeping this one until anyone proposes another avatar to me in any of my games :pIn post 120, Tuxedo Mask wrote:P-edit: You and I can RVS as long as you like, but if you change your avatar you're dead to me.
u are overanalyzing what was essentially a reaction test. its not that deep. learned that u are very defensive however, so noted.In post 117, HoldenGolden wrote:What's your read then also on Tuxedo given his participation with the WIFOM?
I'm confused overall because:
-> You said I "WIFOM'd too much" which means that there is some threshold that a town should be able to WIFOM in your eyes.
-> Then you say that town shouldn't WIFOM at all.
-> into saying to me "Have good faith in me, I am trying to move town out of RVS. You are overracting and hung up on a question."
Do you see why I am curious about my question now?
In post 121, Hoctac wrote:I'm keeping this one until anyone proposes another avatar to me in any of my games :pIn post 120, Tuxedo Mask wrote:P-edit: You and I can RVS as long as you like, but if you change your avatar you're dead to me.