I can’t see it being you, PB, Ali or TSE and Occam's razor likely just means Ame is just bad town > scum. I don’t think it’s likely to be ABR anymore but unless TSE flips on PB like he did Creature, I’m not interested in lynching there.In post 3571, Titus wrote:It's probably nk15 or ABR anyway but I won't vote ABR with the big shot up in case I am wrong.
Scum can just no kill regardless. Its a bad move.In post 3567, Alisae wrote:Btw
VOTE: no
Now that I think about it this is better.
today we lynch and if there’s a kill its 1v5
Then another lynch and another kill is 1v3
Then we capture and its 1v2 with the captured person being confirmed town if there’s a kill.
Why? Doesn’t venge put one lynch in control of one player and if they’re wrong, how doesn’t that just help scum?In post 3576, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Scum can just no kill regardless. Its a bad move.In post 3567, Alisae wrote:Btw
VOTE: no
Now that I think about it this is better.
today we lynch and if there’s a kill its 1v5
Then another lynch and another kill is 1v3
Then we capture and its 1v2 with the captured person being confirmed town if there’s a kill.
This reads like Mastina spewing Ginnie town. I also like TSE’s conviction on PB. As scum, he is a lot more agenday than he is here.In post 632, mastina wrote:(Ginngie is town by the way. Thought y'all should know. <3)In post 390, Ginngie wrote:I'm sheeping a big enough group so they can't all be scum and my slot can do pro-town things while I'm currently busy in life not able to focus.In post 388, Hectic wrote:Ginngie has done nothing but sheep their crew so far lol.
Oh right. Yeah, unless the captured is the last person in most people’s PoE, scum could just no kill to frame them.In post 3579, Albert B. Rampage wrote:The capture at 1v3
Or conversely, the captured could also be scum but if there’s a kill, then the captured player is of course then confitown.In post 3581, Raven Branwen wrote:Oh right. Yeah, unless the captured is the last person in most people’s PoE, scum could just no kill to frame them.In post 3579, Albert B. Rampage wrote:The capture at 1v3
Read this if you want to vote no.In post 3570, Not Known 15 wrote:No it is...In post 3567, Alisae wrote:Btw
VOTE: no
Now that I think about it this is better.
today we lynch and if there’s a kill its 1v5
Then another lynch and another kill is 1v3
Then we capture and its 1v2 with the captured person being confirmed town if there’s a kill.
today we lynch then there is a vengekill and a nightkill and its 1v4.
then another lynch and a vengekill. Then IF mafia can do another nightkill it is over(dont forget that that one costs 1 xp)
If not it goes to another lynch and a vengekill.
vs.
today we lynch and if there is a kill its 1v5
then another lynch and another kill it is 1v3
then we capture and... the captured person gets killed resulting in 1v2 without confirmed town.
That`s 4 checks plus potentially 2 others... vs 4 checks...
Why? If the lynched player is wrong, how doesn’t that help scum? If we vote no, that’s one less townie dead.In post 3583, Albert B. Rampage wrote:We should vote yes on the vengekill.
A vengekill gives one player too much control. Why can’t we just normal lynch, if game doesn’t end, wait to see what happened during the night and lynch again?In post 3584, Not Known 15 wrote:Read this if you want to vote no.In post 3570, Not Known 15 wrote:No it is...In post 3567, Alisae wrote:Btw
VOTE: no
Now that I think about it this is better.
today we lynch and if there’s a kill its 1v5
Then another lynch and another kill is 1v3
Then we capture and its 1v2 with the captured person being confirmed town if there’s a kill.
today we lynch then there is a vengekill and a nightkill and its 1v4.
then another lynch and a vengekill. Then IF mafia can do another nightkill it is over(dont forget that that one costs 1 xp)
If not it goes to another lynch and a vengekill.
vs.
today we lynch and if there is a kill its 1v5
then another lynch and another kill it is 1v3
then we capture and... the captured person gets killed resulting in 1v2 without confirmed town.
That`s 4 checks plus potentially 2 others... vs 4 checks...
In post 3497, Ame wrote:@Modwhat resolves first if a player is lynched and upgrades during the day?
In post 3525, Raven Branwen wrote:@mod, please tell us that scum can’t NK their buddies or I think my brain might literally explode.
In post 3562, Raven Branwen wrote:@mod, can scum kill a buddy if it happens outside of the factional kill?
What? The vengekill is done by confirmed town!!!! Unless I am the investigative and I probably won`t survive we won`t get any meaningful results at night, too.In post 3586, Raven Branwen wrote:A vengekill gives one player too much control. Why can’t we just normal lynch, if game doesn’t end, wait to see what happened during the night and lynch again?
I never said it wasn’t, what I did say is that it gives one player too much power, in case they are WRONG. With a lynch, it’s the majority who decide.In post 3590, Not Known 15 wrote:What? The vengekill is done by confirmed town!!!! Unless I am the investigative and I probably won`t survive we won`t get any meaningful results at night, too.In post 3586, Raven Branwen wrote:A vengekill gives one player too much control. Why can’t we just normal lynch, if game doesn’t end, wait to see what happened during the night and lynch again?
In post 3588, Professor Moriarty wrote:In post 3525, Raven Branwen wrote:@mod, please tell us that scum can’t NK their buddies or I think my brain might literally explode.The mafia factional kill may target any player other than the player making it, including a mafia member.
Woah, so Ame can’t actually be considered mech confitown based on this but still I think that scum would be more likely to kill hostile town > a buddy. I particularly thought scum could never NK a buddy during factional kill. *Mind blown*.In post 3589, Professor Moriarty wrote:In post 3562, Raven Branwen wrote:@mod, can scum kill a buddy if it happens outside of the factional kill?If they had a role that allowed them to do so, yes.
treestump, though....In post 3594, Raven Branwen wrote:Woah, so Ame can’t actually be considered mech confitown based on this but still I think that scum would be more likely to kill hostile town > a buddy. I particularly thought scum could never NK a buddy during factional kill. *Mind blown*.
The flaw in this reasoning is that vigs more often than not misvig town. Why couldn’t scum!Ame have vigged lhf > a buddy? Is it possible that Ame is scum who treestumped Farkset? Apparently it is. Is it likely? Not really and why couldn’t have scum!Ame just vigged town and not take responsibility for it? It’s not like he was anywhere near L-1 or even being wagoned at the time, so I think scum!Ame just viggs town and says nothing, is more believable than your theory imo. As Titus said, this is something not to seriously consider before we hit LYLO.In post 3595, Not Known 15 wrote:treestump, though....In post 3594, Raven Branwen wrote:Woah, so Ame can’t actually be considered mech confitown based on this but still I think that scum would be more likely to kill hostile town > a buddy. I particularly thought scum could never NK a buddy during factional kill. *Mind blown*.
I’m way more upset that you mislynched Creature, after I unvoted ABR and why you wanted to mislynch me, when my XP claim perfectly fits with my miscellaneous result, is something I can’t even begin to comprehend.In post 3597, Ame wrote:This is the right choice. @Titus @Raven sorry for defending scum yesterday. Let's end the game.