Mini Normal 2143 (Game over)

Normal Games (With basic roles and standard mechanics) Signups Here
Forum rules
User avatar
Quick
Quick
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Quick
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5781
Joined: October 11, 2017

Post Post #975 (ISO) » Mon May 25, 2020 7:15 am

Post by Quick »

In post 929, Farkran wrote:VOTE: Quick

Prove me wrong
How about you prove your theory right?
https://youtu.be/LRkYiRnRzY0

Wakie, wakie. Eggs and Bacie.
User avatar
Quick
Quick
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Quick
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5781
Joined: October 11, 2017

Post Post #976 (ISO) » Mon May 25, 2020 7:19 am

Post by Quick »

In post 974, Farkran wrote:I will have to read that 1v1 better, so far i only have isoed my lynchpool. I need to draw a better player profile of quick to see if he would be the type to be emotionally involved in his reads

I don't like any of his takes though, and my opinion is that most if not all of them are a fight against gamestate progression rather than helping it

Like, making bullshit claims, restarting shitposts, not believing easy claims ... All of this seems to be smoke in the town's eyes.
Okay.. So you don't like my play.. Whatever. I'll just say it generated a LOT of discussion. As far as voting for me, so far you haven't come up with anything AI for why you are voting me. That makes me sad.
https://youtu.be/LRkYiRnRzY0

Wakie, wakie. Eggs and Bacie.
User avatar
NorwegianboyEE
NorwegianboyEE
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
NorwegianboyEE
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 24002
Joined: August 25, 2019
Location: Norway

Post Post #977 (ISO) » Mon May 25, 2020 7:35 am

Post by NorwegianboyEE »

VOTE: Drew-sta
Does anyone townread him?
User avatar
Farkran
Farkran
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Farkran
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4070
Joined: August 16, 2019
Location: Italy

Post Post #978 (ISO) » Mon May 25, 2020 7:36 am

Post by Farkran »

Hi quick, what's your up to date opinion on popopo and drewsta?
Farkran is back poggers
-Alisae
User avatar
Quick
Quick
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Quick
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5781
Joined: October 11, 2017

Post Post #979 (ISO) » Mon May 25, 2020 7:44 am

Post by Quick »

Spoiler: Wall
In post 815, Drew-Sta wrote:It's a big fat wall. Trump wishes he could build what I built.

Spoiler:
In post 24, NoPowerOverMe wrote:If someone does something scummy on the first page, it's still scummy. Wanting to lynch a claimed jester because we may not find other scum is scummy. Why not just find scum?
I agree with this.
In post 25, Mohab500 wrote:That's such a weird way of looking at it: I am proposing we lynch him in case we have no other reads, I'd rather mislynch a Jester than deal with a headache claiming to be a Jester the entire game, especially if we have no better leads. But I am not adverse to lynching someone else if we have to, I guess.
In post 75, Sakura Hana wrote:It's also instaloss coz no one would lynch the Jester and the Jester wouldnt lynch scum.
In post 81, NoPowerOverMe wrote:I disagree jester is still town
In post 84, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Lynching negative utility is low-hanging fruit in my opinion
In post 87, NoPowerOverMe wrote:They are a voting member of the town.
I know it's early but entertaining the Jester discussion is bizarre. is the most strange I've seen in a while too.
In post 105, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
In post 82, Mohab500 wrote:Norwegian, thoughts on this Jester talk? What do you think should be done if there is a Jester?
I think jester talk is fine because it can be used to see who's got a scummy mindset or not. But i'm pretty sure it's just a fake claim so i don't personally care much about it. I don't believe this game actually has a jester.
How..? It's the definition of WIFOM.
In post 73, NoPowerOverMe wrote:I am Town reading quick.
In post 77, NoPowerOverMe wrote:I am scum reading Mohab. Scummy is as scummy does.
The views without justification get my attention here.
In post 117, NoPowerOverMe wrote:I claim vanilla town let's get on with Mohab.
This is oddball. VI or something...
In post 122, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Because there are other fish to fry.
And this is actually very silly.
In post 148, Sakura Hana wrote:Also I doubt any scum would've fallen for that, specially if at least one of their teammates is paying attention.
Speculating on scum's reaction to a reaction test is WIFOM.

What does it matter anyway? You're giving scum the opportunity to hide from you by describing how they would or wouldn't act? Or you're explaining away what is scum behaviour vs town behaviour? This comment is fishy.
In post 157, Sakura Hana wrote:NPOM looks like LHF to me right now.
Why?
In post 165, Sakura Hana wrote:If you believe his claim why does that not qualify as LHF for you.
Lynching a claimed townie is not LHF. It's easy NK, but not LHF.

There's WIFOM on what happens if he survives to D2 as well. Maybe then they become LHF, but not D1.
In post 170, Sakura Hana wrote:From my PoV, he does look scummy in a town way, that makes people just want to lynch him, but he's not even trying to accomplish any goal, and seems to believe he's found scum in Mohab and isnt convincing anyone either, plus it's weird to claim VT right then and there if he was scum, which makes him look like LHF for me. Because people want to lynch him for it.
You can't look scummy in a town way. You're either town acting suspiciously or not. Secondly, your emphasis on him being LHF is odd. Why are you guarding him?
In post 181, Porkens wrote:My hot take is that Sakura, despite being second highest in activity, has not scumhunted at all.
I agree.
In post 186, Sakura Hana wrote:Oh hey, that's 2 soft shades already, any more takers?
You're very defensive at the slightest attention on you.
In post 184, Quick wrote:
In post 182, Sakura Hana wrote:
In post 181, Porkens wrote:My hot take is that Sakura, despite being second highest in activity, has not scumhunted at all.
How very observant of you.
This is the sort of thing I consider for SvS, FTR.
Why?

This:
In post 199, Sakura Hana wrote:
In post 197, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Wifom much?
There's WIFOM and there's things that make no sense.
So either I'm scum imitating my town game of townhunting over scumhunting, or I'm town.
No matter how much you ask me to hunt for scum in the "normal" way, That's not how I like to play, if you think that's scummy of me then sure go ahead and lynch me, that wont change how I play because I dont have fun playing that way.
... contradicts this:
In post 196, Sakura Hana wrote:
In post 195, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Cool

Scumminess noted.
So I ask you, if I were scum why wouldnt I at least pretend to scumhunt?
Can I ask why?
In post 228, Sakura Hana wrote:And as a bonus, everything i've said about my meta and my personality is something you can research yourself, this isnt the first time I've been pushed for "not scumhunting" and i bet it wont be the last.
You seem to be doing a very hard job of townreading yourself for others sake. The continued push for people to meta you:
In post 228, Sakura Hana wrote:And as a bonus, everything i've said about my meta and my personality is something you can research yourself, this isnt the first time I've been pushed for "not scumhunting" and i bet it wont be the last.
... feels like 'Look! Look at it all! I'm town gais - I promise'. Then you turn around and do this:
In post 274, Sakura Hana wrote:You also said this based off a reply norwegian did to a post Quick made towards me:
In post 191, Porkens wrote:Deflection. (Partner?)
Partner here seems to imply you think im scum and norwegian is my partner.
Am i wrong in that assumption?
... which is scum hunting.
In post 293, Mohab500 wrote:Past few pages have been lots of bickering between NPOM and Sakura, with firebringer and Fredrick finally joining in. firebringer throws (personal) shade at Porkens and wants us to figure out who's the one person he's townreading, while Fredrick just has a lot of inquisitive questions regarding everyone else's reads (but hasn't actually posted any of his?).

Regarding NPOM and Sakura, the chatter was mostly useless, but I did get a strong feeling it was either TvT or SvT, I think a scum-coordinated argument like that would look a lot more doctored/polished if you get me? Not much else to point out regarding those two, will look in more specifics later and try to give a better read.

Fredrick and firebringers action strike some mild scum vibes here. Regarding Fredrick, their curious nature kind of invites me to think they're scum who wants people to feel they're participating without actually doing anything. firebringer's first few posts and shading at Porkens might just be scum wanting to mislynch with an excuse, though I would probably have to look at the meta's of the players to make more accurate reads, I think.
Tell me why a scum argument would be more coordinated or polished if they don't have daytalk (normal doesn't have DT)... This is a fishy statement to make. It's like... fake scum hunting.
In post 315, Sakura Hana wrote:Ok I'll let that go by if you promise to play the game normally with everyone else and just ignore Porkens. It'll be impossible to read you otherwise.
This is a strange interaction.
In post 323, popopopopopopo wrote:
vote:porkens


sakura's point about shading without voting or even FOS is good, and firebringer is probably town.
I consider this sheeping and without good cause. Sits you in a healthy place for the wagon too.
In post 336, popopopopopopo wrote:
In post 328, Porkens wrote:
In post 323, popopopopopopo wrote:
vote:porkens


sakura's point about shading without voting or even FOS is good, and firebringer is probably town.
Why is her point about shading good?
shading people without calling them scummy or voting them does nothing except increase distrust between the town members. the fact that you even said "i never called you scum" after the shading is also very bad.
... that's, not what he did? I don't even think Porkens threw shade..? He critically analysed two posts that didn't fit together, and then laughed at it after, and then you come in a chainsaw? The claim Porkens made about them being active lurking is true - they are / were. Sakura having to refer to her meta as some sort of justification for her behavior wasn't actually answering the question but deflecting the issue.
In post 362, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Besides, there's nothing wrong with listening to others opinions.
Well, there is. We just haven't seen whether you're doing it for the right or wrong reason yet. It's an ambiguous decision making process which allows you an easy out.
In post 373, Porkens wrote:
In post 336, popopopopopopo wrote:
In post 328, Porkens wrote:
In post 323, popopopopopopo wrote:
vote:porkens


sakura's point about shading without voting or even FOS is good, and firebringer is probably town.
Why is her point about shading good?
shading people without calling them scummy or voting them does nothing except increase distrust between the town members. the fact that you even said "i never called you scum" after the shading is also very bad.
I don’t buy this. My “very observant” post about Sakura was scum hunting, and it led to useful discussion Through which we could develop our reads. I factually stated that I did not call her scum. That has no bearing on whether I think she or her actions are scummy. I’m not casting about trying to make people look scummy. I am asking direct questions and stating my thoughts in an effort to further the game state.

Your argument seems disingenuous to me.
Agree, it appeared to be a chainsaw.
In post 382, Quick wrote:
In post 379, Firebringer wrote:why me? besides the fact i am scum
In post 380, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Well, that obviously means we are town.
Double reaction all the way....
Yeah, I saw that too. I can't make up my mind on NPOM.
In post 365, NorwegianboyEE wrote:This game does have way too many inactive players right now.

@Drew-Sta
@CooLDoG
@Blurryface3189
@Persivul
In post 395, Sakura Hana wrote:So, Looking at the mod's confirmation post, there's 1 player that hasn't confirmed yet.
Persivul is V/LA according to his profile so that could easily be the cause of him not posting. (Although an ego search turns out he's at least posting on his other games, V/LA supposed to end today so I hope we hear from him)
CD hasn't been on site for 2 days, could be the person that hasnt confirmed.
Looking at Blurry's site activity seems to be someone that posts once every blue moon.
Same with Drew.

Looks like we just got some people that just arent active in general. I don't think we can discern alignment from activity alone.
These two posts in tandem appear to be attempts to get attention off currently posting players and into the dark. Which is moving from difficult to lynch players and on to unable to be defended targets.

The decision to move there when neither of these players have formed strong scum reads they've advertised, plus the fact that they seem unwilling to push a wagon, suggests they're more comfortable with moving something on a player that is not posting, as they will struggle to defend themselves and if lynched, it is easy to absolve responsibility of their actions.
In post 398, NoPowerOverMe wrote:But why post once and then not post for several days? You are just asking to be scumread.
You sheep and then scum read but not really form any argument for it. It's proving difficult to defend your actions.

Nor pokes me at , then Sakura takes up the lead in and Nor doesn't prod me again. This seems odd. Especially since both were the ones pushing for non-posters as possible suspects. The fact they didn't acknowledge each others posts on that either, plus what I've just said, appears to be distancing.

and Nor reengages but doesn't push me at all. Sakura then drops off at .

So they either town read me now or don't care about the non-posters? I'm not following the behaviour at all.
In post 496, Firebringer wrote:
In post 495, Sakura Hana wrote:
In post 458, Firebringer wrote:i have legitimate strong townread on sakura now.
I'm curious when and why did u get this strong townread of me, I thought you'd have been able to get this way earlier than when you expressed it, but only now u get a legitimate one.
its the fact that i don't think ur trying to manipulate me in anyway. i think and this is just a theory (and u might try it next time ur scum) u would more or less use me as a foundation to get ur placeholder/foot in the game by locking me in for ur read and then maneuver from there. I think ur playing this without that when the easy option of manipulating me exists and I think even if ur going for a more serious game u would still try to manipulate me in some way.

So i wanted to make sure i didn't see u trying to get me to really townlock u.
This gets my attention from both.

Explaining what would 'allow you to be captured' by someone else via meta and then manipulated, is like... some weird buddying or something. I feel like Sakura's 'not going after someone' here if they have decent understanding of their gameplay to me matches with the whole 'look at my meta, I only town hunt' schtick.

To me it's SvT interaction and I'm leaning to Sakura being scum at this point.

They're very intent on knowing where people sit with them, and then get defensive when people push at them.
In post 512, Sakura Hana wrote:
In post 510, Quick wrote:
In post 509, Sakura Hana wrote:K maybe i jumped the gun townreading you and i retract it.
Let's talk about that process? For me, the only thing saving NPOM rn is their claim.
So? A person is either town or scum.
If there's scum motive behind their actions then they are scum regardless of what they claimed.
If what they claimed and how is towny then there's no scum motive behind their actions.
That's WIFOM. Of course intent is important. They're either lying or not. The trick is working out which.
In post 514, Quick wrote:What is the Scum motive for claiming VT? After ~reasons~ which I won't mention?
I think this is a little naive, or defending something that can't be defended e.g. I don't think you can defend a VT claim this early in the game. It's either a tactic or the play of a VI. I think this is one of the few times meta helps - is NPOW a VI? Their previous games can be indicative of this.
In post 517, Sakura Hana wrote:
In post 378, Quick wrote:Out of the active posters, I would say both FB and NPOM have the best shot at being Scum.
In post 425, Quick wrote:
In post 423, NoPowerOverMe wrote:I'll do whatever Fire does.

VOTE: Persivul
This makes me want you to eat lunch.
When you had previously said:
In post 163, Quick wrote:I take back my TR on you. I can see what you are saying, but that's not the impression I get from NPOM's play here. He either genuinely doesn't want a NK on him (which I have been guilty of before, honestly) or he is makes a WEIRD ASS PLAY here as Scum.

For now, I believe his claim.
In post 166, Quick wrote:
In post 164, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Of course I don't want to be killed how am I supposed to help the town win?
That's the thing... You are low key saying, "No need to kill me because I am VT, look elsewhere" and that implies you think you are good at this game and can solve without being a PR.
Which looks like you forgot you had a townread on your slot, specially considering i called the slot LHF/Lynchbait and you fought me on it.
Gee, this appears to be scumhunting. But I thought you didn't do that...
In post 558, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:
In post 448, Drew-Sta wrote:...
You guys have collectively spewed 13 odd pages of shit. Suggesting I can get an accurate read in all that mess is optimistic at the least.
...
Considering recent events, one man's shit is another man's treasure.
You can fish through my shit all day long mate.
In post 571, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Scumreading a townplayer(Quick)
You seem so, so certain...
In post 578, NoPowerOverMe wrote:
In post 575, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:For clarity: How do you know Quick is a townplayer?
He seems engaged and trying to gamesolve.
In post 576, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:And I just checked. He never even voted for Quick.
Quick could be scum...something’s making me hesitate though so it’s not strong
To me that's a scumread without saying it's a scumread.
Yeah... no.
In post 583, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I'm not sure i want to trust Firebringer anymore. Because their read on Sakura makes no sense. Why are they so obvtown bruh?
VOTE: Firebringer
FB's argument was very clear, actually. Your distrust of it seems fishy. I'm not one to white knight, FB could be scum. But your argument around it seems odd.

It's like you want to get rid of them.
In post 602, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Also i'd like Sakura/Quick to actually explain why they tr FB, because that shit makes little sense to me right now.
In post 604, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
In post 603, Firebringer wrote:quick scumreads me dude.
Not hard enough.
This appears to be a scummy, lazy tactic. You're throwing shit at someone and misrepresenting another players view to push your own.

I consider this a tell.
In post 608, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Also, it's a minor take considering half the game is dead. But all of the wagons seen so far have been god-awful. Can we please get a good and decent one going on FB for the sake of my sanity. Tnx.
Including your own?
In post 609, Firebringer wrote:
In post 583, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I'm not sure i want to trust Firebringer anymore. Because their read on Sakura makes no sense. Why are they so obvtown bruh?
VOTE: Firebringer
In post 585, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
In post 496, Firebringer wrote:its the fact that i don't think ur trying to manipulate me in anyway. i think and this is just a theory (and u might try it next time ur scum) u would more or less use me as a foundation to get ur placeholder/foot in the game by locking me in for ur read and then maneuver from there. I think ur playing this without that when the easy option of manipulating me exists and I think even if ur going for a more serious game u would still try to manipulate me in some way.
I'm considering the fact that you've TR NPOM, Quick and now Sakura. I'm not seeing how this game makes sense if all scum are in lurkers. Are you just trying to pocket most of the active players? And what's this "they would manipulate me if i was scum" BS? How do you know that would be scum!Sakura's play here?
In post 587, NorwegianboyEE wrote:You're too fluffy and pockety compared to our last game FB. There's a pretty big difference.
In post 591, NorwegianboyEE wrote:In Fungi Mafia FB was actually lightly scum hunting, also picking a couple few TR's. Not handing them out like candy. Also, even though he always jokes. It was intertwined with actual solving. Here he just doesn't seem to care. As evidenced by wagoning either for some personal BS reason that has nothing to do with the game, or encouraging a wagon a dude that hasn't even posted FFS.
https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... #p11828723
doesn't seem like a lazy scum norwe push
This makes me second guess my view on norwe, but I also think it's a case of nor pushing to get something started on someone.
In post 614, Firebringer wrote:fungi mafia cliff notes of Norwee:
--> Sometimes gave some insight to players usually mild mannered. Usually only gave long cases for why he thought a player was town.
--> Doesn't try to take control of game or lead. Perfectly willing to take a back seat.
--> Passiveness

Ur scumcase on me doesn't match this.

Yeah, im comfortable with u in my townreads.
Disagree. This isn't what they're doing here IMHO.

Number 1 and 2 don't correlate with their existing behaviour in this game. I checked fungi, they were town. So what are you actually trying to say here?!

I'll come back to .
In post 635, Sakura Hana wrote:
In post 602, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Also i'd like Sakura/Quick to actually explain why they tr FB, because that shit makes little sense to me right now.
Firebringer is an old friend and knows all my weaknesses and It hasnt felt like he's trying to exploit them, a scum!FB would have
probably
TR me much earlier considering I got into the game from the get go and would've been pretty easy to call me TR due to meta and I would be none the wiser. His explanation on his TR of me matches his play around me and so I figured he's probably town.
In post 587, NorwegianboyEE wrote:You're too fluffy and pockety compared to our last game FB. There's a pretty big difference.
Our last game he was pretty obsessed with me, but, I feel he was MORE fluffy on fungi mafia.
In post 636, Sakura Hana wrote:Basically my feeling also comes from the fact that Firebringer is a pretty strong player, he is perfectly capable of playing normally,
but where's the fun in that
, and getting himself townread in the process. Considering he's just being fluffy he's just having fun, and being in an environment of people that arent very familiar with him
to my knowledge
he'd have a much easier time just playing normally and getting townread as scum, than whatever he's doing right now, it feels kind of anti-scum, if you know what i mean.

There's a non zero chance he's playing this way in order to pocket specific people
including me
, and you're free to point and laugh at me if he flips scum, but at this point I don't think he's doing anything to advance any specific agenda.
That's buddying to get them in your pocket.
In post 637, Sakura Hana wrote:Oh and talking reads, I do agree that now this is more similar to the town norwegian than the scum norwegian i've seen. So norwegian can go into the town bin too.
You and Nor sit at opposite ends of the spectrum on FB, which IMHO is of interest given the links I've drawn to you both.
In post 638, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I don’t think FB flipping scum would equate Sakura scum based on FB’s play around the slot.
And that right there is an interesting post. Basically absolving Sakura from being mafia if FB flips scum. Why would you do that? How do you have any certainty that is the case?! It's a post of certainty, and I cannot understand how you can be so certain about them.

, , , , I'll come back to later as there's a lot to analyse in there for me.

Porkens vote in is odd.
In post 772, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Drew has been lacking too. He came, he left. And everyone forgot im.
Now you touch on me again. And not in the 'sexy Norwegian chick' kind of way.

You seem to like to shift focus at times when focus is on you.
In post 801, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:
In post 570, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:
In post 568, NoPowerOverMe wrote:More votes on the pig please.
Why?
In post 571, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Scumreading a townplayer(Quick)
In post 578, NoPowerOverMe wrote:
In post 575, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:For clarity: How do you know Quick is a townplayer?
He seems engaged and trying to gamesolve.
In post 576, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:And I just checked. He never even voted for Quick.
Quick could be scum...something’s making me hesitate though so it’s not strong
To me that's a scumread without saying it's a scumread.
So, NoPowerOverMe, you want(ed) more votes on Porkens because he is/was scumreading Quick, whom you assert is a town player. Is that an accurate representation of your thoughts?
This is accurate, but I think you're floating up the wrong shit show mate.

Porkens appears to be trying to trap people but not sure if that's scum hunting or trying to get townies lynched by their own rope.

In post 815, Drew-Sta wrote:Tl:dr - I think Nor, Sakura appear to be scum at this point. I think we need to wait for Farken and Pers to contribute before we can proceed much further.

VOTE: NorwegianboyEE

Pages 28-32 are odd and I need to go review again. CoolDog's entrance changed the games dynamic a bit. I have to sift through what they've posted better as my initial thoughts are it didn't read right in placed and also read very well in others.
You didn't even talk about Norwegian in this "wall" and it's not even like you are making a case or anything. -100 Town points.
https://youtu.be/LRkYiRnRzY0

Wakie, wakie. Eggs and Bacie.
User avatar
Quick
Quick
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Quick
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5781
Joined: October 11, 2017

Post Post #980 (ISO) » Mon May 25, 2020 7:45 am

Post by Quick »

In post 978, Farkran wrote:Hi quick, what's your up to date opinion on popopo and drewsta?
I never gave a read on Drew before, but I def do NOT like what I am seeing. popo needs to post more, read pending.
https://youtu.be/LRkYiRnRzY0

Wakie, wakie. Eggs and Bacie.
User avatar
Quick
Quick
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Quick
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5781
Joined: October 11, 2017

Post Post #981 (ISO) » Mon May 25, 2020 7:45 am

Post by Quick »

In post 977, NorwegianboyEE wrote:VOTE: Drew-sta
Does anyone townread him?
I can do this too.

VOTE: Drew
https://youtu.be/LRkYiRnRzY0

Wakie, wakie. Eggs and Bacie.
User avatar
Farkran
Farkran
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Farkran
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4070
Joined: August 16, 2019
Location: Italy

Post Post #982 (ISO) » Mon May 25, 2020 7:52 am

Post by Farkran »

Hmm. I can relate to that. After worktime i can take a better look at quick to see if i am wrong, meanwhile let's get a wagon going on

VOTE: drewsta

Anyone has an opinion to share on this newly born wagon?
Farkran is back poggers
-Alisae
User avatar
Sakura Hana
Sakura Hana
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Sakura Hana
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 26357
Joined: April 17, 2013
Location: In the Magical World of Anime

Post Post #983 (ISO) » Mon May 25, 2020 8:29 am

Post by Sakura Hana »

In post 979, Quick wrote:You didn't even talk about Norwegian in this "wall"
He did, Frederick even made a cut version that only showed his talk about Norwegian.
I bloom in spring?
Please be nice to me.
User avatar
Porkens
Porkens
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Porkens
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 9700
Joined: June 20, 2008

Post Post #984 (ISO) » Mon May 25, 2020 8:41 am

Post by Porkens »

In post 903, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:
In post 899, Firebringer wrote:
In post 898, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:
In post 895, Firebringer wrote:u could always ask me questions
That's true. Unfortunately, I have no idea what I could possibly ask that will help me determine your alignment.
at least u didn't ask me if i was town. I would have had to say no, otherwise my honesty streak ends.
Since you've been claiming to be scum, I'll just treat you as such.

VOTE: Firebringer

L-3
this post
is a very scummy post
can't blame me
he told us to
worse than random
User avatar
Quick
Quick
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Quick
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5781
Joined: October 11, 2017

Post Post #985 (ISO) » Mon May 25, 2020 8:42 am

Post by Quick »

In post 983, Sakura Hana wrote:
In post 979, Quick wrote:You didn't even talk about Norwegian in this "wall"
He did, Frederick even made a cut version that only showed his talk about Norwegian.
You mean like this:
In post 979, Quick wrote:
Spoiler: Wall
...
In post 815, Drew-Sta wrote:
In post 815, Drew-Sta wrote:Tl:dr - I think Nor, Sakura appear to be scum at this point. I think we need to wait for Farken and Pers to contribute before we can proceed much further.

VOTE: NorwegianboyEE

Pages 28-32 are odd and I need to go review again. CoolDog's entrance changed the games dynamic a bit. I have to sift through what they've posted better as my initial thoughts are it didn't read right in placed and also read very well in others.
You didn't even talk about Norwegian in this "wall" and it's not even like you are making a case or anything. -100 Town points.
https://youtu.be/LRkYiRnRzY0

Wakie, wakie. Eggs and Bacie.
User avatar
Porkens
Porkens
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Porkens
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 9700
Joined: June 20, 2008

Post Post #986 (ISO) » Mon May 25, 2020 8:44 am

Post by Porkens »

In post 846, Firebringer wrote:
In post 843, Porkens wrote:It leaves me with the fact that you are still scum trying to look town by reading the game and telling us what you think we think you should think.
whats this mean
as scum, reading the game is a chore
there's no mystery so it's a bore
like a book report
on a tomb you don't wanna read
his game's analysis
is mafia screed.
worse than random
User avatar
NoPowerOverMe
NoPowerOverMe
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
NoPowerOverMe
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4082
Joined: May 9, 2020

Post Post #987 (ISO) » Mon May 25, 2020 9:30 am

Post by NoPowerOverMe »

In a 1v1 of pig v. drew, I would pick drew as town and pork as scum.
User avatar
popopopopopopo
popopopopopopo
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
popopopopopopo
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1290
Joined: July 16, 2018

Post Post #988 (ISO) » Mon May 25, 2020 9:52 am

Post by popopopopopopo »

In post 445, Drew-Sta wrote:
In post 440, Firebringer wrote:
In post 437, Drew-Sta wrote:
In post 431, Firebringer wrote:"i thought we are out of RVS"
"no i have no reads"

how are we out of RVS if u have 0 reads buddy
I said the game is, not me.

Touchy, aren’t we.
i touch everything!

but if u have no reads, u doing a random vote right now isn't out of the question. Or am i wrong?
I don’t like random voting. Just not my schtick.
In post 441, Quick wrote:
In post 440, Firebringer wrote:i touch everything!
FB is Joe Biden confirmed.
lol.
In post 487, Firebringer wrote:im pretty sure scum me could dance around all but 2 players here.
never got to this last night, working on a catchup now
I am the fly, I am the fly, I am the fly, I am the fly, fly in the, fly in the ointment
User avatar
popopopopopopo
popopopopopopo
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
popopopopopopo
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1290
Joined: July 16, 2018

Post Post #989 (ISO) » Mon May 25, 2020 9:52 am

Post by popopopopopopo »

ignore those quotes, multiquote foiled me again.
I am the fly, I am the fly, I am the fly, I am the fly, fly in the, fly in the ointment
User avatar
Drew-Sta
Drew-Sta
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Drew-Sta
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1236
Joined: April 21, 2014

Post Post #990 (ISO) » Mon May 25, 2020 10:12 am

Post by Drew-Sta »

Nice. Three votes in quick succession. FB doesn’t like me, Nor picks up his argument (an elongated OMGUS) and straight away we’re off to a mislynch.

Nor, why do you think my argument doesn’t come from a town perspective?
User avatar
Drew-Sta
Drew-Sta
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Drew-Sta
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1236
Joined: April 21, 2014

Post Post #991 (ISO) » Mon May 25, 2020 10:15 am

Post by Drew-Sta »

In post 979, Quick wrote:
Spoiler: Wall
In post 815, Drew-Sta wrote:It's a big fat wall. Trump wishes he could build what I built.

Spoiler:
In post 24, NoPowerOverMe wrote:If someone does something scummy on the first page, it's still scummy. Wanting to lynch a claimed jester because we may not find other scum is scummy. Why not just find scum?
I agree with this.
In post 25, Mohab500 wrote:That's such a weird way of looking at it: I am proposing we lynch him in case we have no other reads, I'd rather mislynch a Jester than deal with a headache claiming to be a Jester the entire game, especially if we have no better leads. But I am not adverse to lynching someone else if we have to, I guess.
In post 75, Sakura Hana wrote:It's also instaloss coz no one would lynch the Jester and the Jester wouldnt lynch scum.
In post 81, NoPowerOverMe wrote:I disagree jester is still town
In post 84, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Lynching negative utility is low-hanging fruit in my opinion
In post 87, NoPowerOverMe wrote:They are a voting member of the town.
I know it's early but entertaining the Jester discussion is bizarre. is the most strange I've seen in a while too.
In post 105, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
In post 82, Mohab500 wrote:Norwegian, thoughts on this Jester talk? What do you think should be done if there is a Jester?
I think jester talk is fine because it can be used to see who's got a scummy mindset or not. But i'm pretty sure it's just a fake claim so i don't personally care much about it. I don't believe this game actually has a jester.
How..? It's the definition of WIFOM.
In post 73, NoPowerOverMe wrote:I am Town reading quick.
In post 77, NoPowerOverMe wrote:I am scum reading Mohab. Scummy is as scummy does.
The views without justification get my attention here.
In post 117, NoPowerOverMe wrote:I claim vanilla town let's get on with Mohab.
This is oddball. VI or something...
In post 122, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Because there are other fish to fry.
And this is actually very silly.
In post 148, Sakura Hana wrote:Also I doubt any scum would've fallen for that, specially if at least one of their teammates is paying attention.
Speculating on scum's reaction to a reaction test is WIFOM.

What does it matter anyway? You're giving scum the opportunity to hide from you by describing how they would or wouldn't act? Or you're explaining away what is scum behaviour vs town behaviour? This comment is fishy.
In post 157, Sakura Hana wrote:NPOM looks like LHF to me right now.
Why?
In post 165, Sakura Hana wrote:If you believe his claim why does that not qualify as LHF for you.
Lynching a claimed townie is not LHF. It's easy NK, but not LHF.

There's WIFOM on what happens if he survives to D2 as well. Maybe then they become LHF, but not D1.
In post 170, Sakura Hana wrote:From my PoV, he does look scummy in a town way, that makes people just want to lynch him, but he's not even trying to accomplish any goal, and seems to believe he's found scum in Mohab and isnt convincing anyone either, plus it's weird to claim VT right then and there if he was scum, which makes him look like LHF for me. Because people want to lynch him for it.
You can't look scummy in a town way. You're either town acting suspiciously or not. Secondly, your emphasis on him being LHF is odd. Why are you guarding him?
In post 181, Porkens wrote:My hot take is that Sakura, despite being second highest in activity, has not scumhunted at all.
I agree.
In post 186, Sakura Hana wrote:Oh hey, that's 2 soft shades already, any more takers?
You're very defensive at the slightest attention on you.
In post 184, Quick wrote:
In post 182, Sakura Hana wrote:
In post 181, Porkens wrote:My hot take is that Sakura, despite being second highest in activity, has not scumhunted at all.
How very observant of you.
This is the sort of thing I consider for SvS, FTR.
Why?

This:
In post 199, Sakura Hana wrote:
In post 197, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Wifom much?
There's WIFOM and there's things that make no sense.
So either I'm scum imitating my town game of townhunting over scumhunting, or I'm town.
No matter how much you ask me to hunt for scum in the "normal" way, That's not how I like to play, if you think that's scummy of me then sure go ahead and lynch me, that wont change how I play because I dont have fun playing that way.
... contradicts this:
In post 196, Sakura Hana wrote:
In post 195, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Cool

Scumminess noted.
So I ask you, if I were scum why wouldnt I at least pretend to scumhunt?
Can I ask why?
In post 228, Sakura Hana wrote:And as a bonus, everything i've said about my meta and my personality is something you can research yourself, this isnt the first time I've been pushed for "not scumhunting" and i bet it wont be the last.
You seem to be doing a very hard job of townreading yourself for others sake. The continued push for people to meta you:
In post 228, Sakura Hana wrote:And as a bonus, everything i've said about my meta and my personality is something you can research yourself, this isnt the first time I've been pushed for "not scumhunting" and i bet it wont be the last.
... feels like 'Look! Look at it all! I'm town gais - I promise'. Then you turn around and do this:
In post 274, Sakura Hana wrote:You also said this based off a reply norwegian did to a post Quick made towards me:
In post 191, Porkens wrote:Deflection. (Partner?)
Partner here seems to imply you think im scum and norwegian is my partner.
Am i wrong in that assumption?
... which is scum hunting.
In post 293, Mohab500 wrote:Past few pages have been lots of bickering between NPOM and Sakura, with firebringer and Fredrick finally joining in. firebringer throws (personal) shade at Porkens and wants us to figure out who's the one person he's townreading, while Fredrick just has a lot of inquisitive questions regarding everyone else's reads (but hasn't actually posted any of his?).

Regarding NPOM and Sakura, the chatter was mostly useless, but I did get a strong feeling it was either TvT or SvT, I think a scum-coordinated argument like that would look a lot more doctored/polished if you get me? Not much else to point out regarding those two, will look in more specifics later and try to give a better read.

Fredrick and firebringers action strike some mild scum vibes here. Regarding Fredrick, their curious nature kind of invites me to think they're scum who wants people to feel they're participating without actually doing anything. firebringer's first few posts and shading at Porkens might just be scum wanting to mislynch with an excuse, though I would probably have to look at the meta's of the players to make more accurate reads, I think.
Tell me why a scum argument would be more coordinated or polished if they don't have daytalk (normal doesn't have DT)... This is a fishy statement to make. It's like... fake scum hunting.
In post 315, Sakura Hana wrote:Ok I'll let that go by if you promise to play the game normally with everyone else and just ignore Porkens. It'll be impossible to read you otherwise.
This is a strange interaction.
In post 323, popopopopopopo wrote:
vote:porkens


sakura's point about shading without voting or even FOS is good, and firebringer is probably town.
I consider this sheeping and without good cause. Sits you in a healthy place for the wagon too.
In post 336, popopopopopopo wrote:
In post 328, Porkens wrote:
In post 323, popopopopopopo wrote:
vote:porkens


sakura's point about shading without voting or even FOS is good, and firebringer is probably town.
Why is her point about shading good?
shading people without calling them scummy or voting them does nothing except increase distrust between the town members. the fact that you even said "i never called you scum" after the shading is also very bad.
... that's, not what he did? I don't even think Porkens threw shade..? He critically analysed two posts that didn't fit together, and then laughed at it after, and then you come in a chainsaw? The claim Porkens made about them being active lurking is true - they are / were. Sakura having to refer to her meta as some sort of justification for her behavior wasn't actually answering the question but deflecting the issue.
In post 362, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Besides, there's nothing wrong with listening to others opinions.
Well, there is. We just haven't seen whether you're doing it for the right or wrong reason yet. It's an ambiguous decision making process which allows you an easy out.
In post 373, Porkens wrote:
In post 336, popopopopopopo wrote:
In post 328, Porkens wrote:
In post 323, popopopopopopo wrote:
vote:porkens


sakura's point about shading without voting or even FOS is good, and firebringer is probably town.
Why is her point about shading good?
shading people without calling them scummy or voting them does nothing except increase distrust between the town members. the fact that you even said "i never called you scum" after the shading is also very bad.
I don’t buy this. My “very observant” post about Sakura was scum hunting, and it led to useful discussion Through which we could develop our reads. I factually stated that I did not call her scum. That has no bearing on whether I think she or her actions are scummy. I’m not casting about trying to make people look scummy. I am asking direct questions and stating my thoughts in an effort to further the game state.

Your argument seems disingenuous to me.
Agree, it appeared to be a chainsaw.
In post 382, Quick wrote:
In post 379, Firebringer wrote:why me? besides the fact i am scum
In post 380, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Well, that obviously means we are town.
Double reaction all the way....
Yeah, I saw that too. I can't make up my mind on NPOM.
In post 365, NorwegianboyEE wrote:This game does have way too many inactive players right now.

@Drew-Sta
@CooLDoG
@Blurryface3189
@Persivul
In post 395, Sakura Hana wrote:So, Looking at the mod's confirmation post, there's 1 player that hasn't confirmed yet.
Persivul is V/LA according to his profile so that could easily be the cause of him not posting. (Although an ego search turns out he's at least posting on his other games, V/LA supposed to end today so I hope we hear from him)
CD hasn't been on site for 2 days, could be the person that hasnt confirmed.
Looking at Blurry's site activity seems to be someone that posts once every blue moon.
Same with Drew.

Looks like we just got some people that just arent active in general. I don't think we can discern alignment from activity alone.
These two posts in tandem appear to be attempts to get attention off currently posting players and into the dark. Which is moving from difficult to lynch players and on to unable to be defended targets.

The decision to move there when neither of these players have formed strong scum reads they've advertised, plus the fact that they seem unwilling to push a wagon, suggests they're more comfortable with moving something on a player that is not posting, as they will struggle to defend themselves and if lynched, it is easy to absolve responsibility of their actions.
In post 398, NoPowerOverMe wrote:But why post once and then not post for several days? You are just asking to be scumread.
You sheep and then scum read but not really form any argument for it. It's proving difficult to defend your actions.

Nor pokes me at , then Sakura takes up the lead in and Nor doesn't prod me again. This seems odd. Especially since both were the ones pushing for non-posters as possible suspects. The fact they didn't acknowledge each others posts on that either, plus what I've just said, appears to be distancing.

and Nor reengages but doesn't push me at all. Sakura then drops off at .

So they either town read me now or don't care about the non-posters? I'm not following the behaviour at all.
In post 496, Firebringer wrote:
In post 495, Sakura Hana wrote:
In post 458, Firebringer wrote:i have legitimate strong townread on sakura now.
I'm curious when and why did u get this strong townread of me, I thought you'd have been able to get this way earlier than when you expressed it, but only now u get a legitimate one.
its the fact that i don't think ur trying to manipulate me in anyway. i think and this is just a theory (and u might try it next time ur scum) u would more or less use me as a foundation to get ur placeholder/foot in the game by locking me in for ur read and then maneuver from there. I think ur playing this without that when the easy option of manipulating me exists and I think even if ur going for a more serious game u would still try to manipulate me in some way.

So i wanted to make sure i didn't see u trying to get me to really townlock u.
This gets my attention from both.

Explaining what would 'allow you to be captured' by someone else via meta and then manipulated, is like... some weird buddying or something. I feel like Sakura's 'not going after someone' here if they have decent understanding of their gameplay to me matches with the whole 'look at my meta, I only town hunt' schtick.

To me it's SvT interaction and I'm leaning to Sakura being scum at this point.

They're very intent on knowing where people sit with them, and then get defensive when people push at them.
In post 512, Sakura Hana wrote:
In post 510, Quick wrote:
In post 509, Sakura Hana wrote:K maybe i jumped the gun townreading you and i retract it.
Let's talk about that process? For me, the only thing saving NPOM rn is their claim.
So? A person is either town or scum.
If there's scum motive behind their actions then they are scum regardless of what they claimed.
If what they claimed and how is towny then there's no scum motive behind their actions.
That's WIFOM. Of course intent is important. They're either lying or not. The trick is working out which.
In post 514, Quick wrote:What is the Scum motive for claiming VT? After ~reasons~ which I won't mention?
I think this is a little naive, or defending something that can't be defended e.g. I don't think you can defend a VT claim this early in the game. It's either a tactic or the play of a VI. I think this is one of the few times meta helps - is NPOW a VI? Their previous games can be indicative of this.
In post 517, Sakura Hana wrote:
In post 378, Quick wrote:Out of the active posters, I would say both FB and NPOM have the best shot at being Scum.
In post 425, Quick wrote:
In post 423, NoPowerOverMe wrote:I'll do whatever Fire does.

VOTE: Persivul
This makes me want you to eat lunch.
When you had previously said:
In post 163, Quick wrote:I take back my TR on you. I can see what you are saying, but that's not the impression I get from NPOM's play here. He either genuinely doesn't want a NK on him (which I have been guilty of before, honestly) or he is makes a WEIRD ASS PLAY here as Scum.

For now, I believe his claim.
In post 166, Quick wrote:
In post 164, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Of course I don't want to be killed how am I supposed to help the town win?
That's the thing... You are low key saying, "No need to kill me because I am VT, look elsewhere" and that implies you think you are good at this game and can solve without being a PR.
Which looks like you forgot you had a townread on your slot, specially considering i called the slot LHF/Lynchbait and you fought me on it.
Gee, this appears to be scumhunting. But I thought you didn't do that...
In post 558, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:
In post 448, Drew-Sta wrote:...
You guys have collectively spewed 13 odd pages of shit. Suggesting I can get an accurate read in all that mess is optimistic at the least.
...
Considering recent events, one man's shit is another man's treasure.
You can fish through my shit all day long mate.
In post 571, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Scumreading a townplayer(Quick)
You seem so, so certain...
In post 578, NoPowerOverMe wrote:
In post 575, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:For clarity: How do you know Quick is a townplayer?
He seems engaged and trying to gamesolve.
In post 576, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:And I just checked. He never even voted for Quick.
Quick could be scum...something’s making me hesitate though so it’s not strong
To me that's a scumread without saying it's a scumread.
Yeah... no.
In post 583, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I'm not sure i want to trust Firebringer anymore. Because their read on Sakura makes no sense. Why are they so obvtown bruh?
VOTE: Firebringer
FB's argument was very clear, actually. Your distrust of it seems fishy. I'm not one to white knight, FB could be scum. But your argument around it seems odd.

It's like you want to get rid of them.
In post 602, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Also i'd like Sakura/Quick to actually explain why they tr FB, because that shit makes little sense to me right now.
In post 604, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
In post 603, Firebringer wrote:quick scumreads me dude.
Not hard enough.
This appears to be a scummy, lazy tactic. You're throwing shit at someone and misrepresenting another players view to push your own.

I consider this a tell.
In post 608, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Also, it's a minor take considering half the game is dead. But all of the wagons seen so far have been god-awful. Can we please get a good and decent one going on FB for the sake of my sanity. Tnx.
Including your own?
In post 609, Firebringer wrote:
In post 583, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I'm not sure i want to trust Firebringer anymore. Because their read on Sakura makes no sense. Why are they so obvtown bruh?
VOTE: Firebringer
In post 585, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
In post 496, Firebringer wrote:its the fact that i don't think ur trying to manipulate me in anyway. i think and this is just a theory (and u might try it next time ur scum) u would more or less use me as a foundation to get ur placeholder/foot in the game by locking me in for ur read and then maneuver from there. I think ur playing this without that when the easy option of manipulating me exists and I think even if ur going for a more serious game u would still try to manipulate me in some way.
I'm considering the fact that you've TR NPOM, Quick and now Sakura. I'm not seeing how this game makes sense if all scum are in lurkers. Are you just trying to pocket most of the active players? And what's this "they would manipulate me if i was scum" BS? How do you know that would be scum!Sakura's play here?
In post 587, NorwegianboyEE wrote:You're too fluffy and pockety compared to our last game FB. There's a pretty big difference.
In post 591, NorwegianboyEE wrote:In Fungi Mafia FB was actually lightly scum hunting, also picking a couple few TR's. Not handing them out like candy. Also, even though he always jokes. It was intertwined with actual solving. Here he just doesn't seem to care. As evidenced by wagoning either for some personal BS reason that has nothing to do with the game, or encouraging a wagon a dude that hasn't even posted FFS.
https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... #p11828723
doesn't seem like a lazy scum norwe push
This makes me second guess my view on norwe, but I also think it's a case of nor pushing to get something started on someone.
In post 614, Firebringer wrote:fungi mafia cliff notes of Norwee:
--> Sometimes gave some insight to players usually mild mannered. Usually only gave long cases for why he thought a player was town.
--> Doesn't try to take control of game or lead. Perfectly willing to take a back seat.
--> Passiveness

Ur scumcase on me doesn't match this.

Yeah, im comfortable with u in my townreads.
Disagree. This isn't what they're doing here IMHO.

Number 1 and 2 don't correlate with their existing behaviour in this game. I checked fungi, they were town. So what are you actually trying to say here?!

I'll come back to .
In post 635, Sakura Hana wrote:
In post 602, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Also i'd like Sakura/Quick to actually explain why they tr FB, because that shit makes little sense to me right now.
Firebringer is an old friend and knows all my weaknesses and It hasnt felt like he's trying to exploit them, a scum!FB would have
probably
TR me much earlier considering I got into the game from the get go and would've been pretty easy to call me TR due to meta and I would be none the wiser. His explanation on his TR of me matches his play around me and so I figured he's probably town.
In post 587, NorwegianboyEE wrote:You're too fluffy and pockety compared to our last game FB. There's a pretty big difference.
Our last game he was pretty obsessed with me, but, I feel he was MORE fluffy on fungi mafia.
In post 636, Sakura Hana wrote:Basically my feeling also comes from the fact that Firebringer is a pretty strong player, he is perfectly capable of playing normally,
but where's the fun in that
, and getting himself townread in the process. Considering he's just being fluffy he's just having fun, and being in an environment of people that arent very familiar with him
to my knowledge
he'd have a much easier time just playing normally and getting townread as scum, than whatever he's doing right now, it feels kind of anti-scum, if you know what i mean.

There's a non zero chance he's playing this way in order to pocket specific people
including me
, and you're free to point and laugh at me if he flips scum, but at this point I don't think he's doing anything to advance any specific agenda.
That's buddying to get them in your pocket.
In post 637, Sakura Hana wrote:Oh and talking reads, I do agree that now this is more similar to the town norwegian than the scum norwegian i've seen. So norwegian can go into the town bin too.
You and Nor sit at opposite ends of the spectrum on FB, which IMHO is of interest given the links I've drawn to you both.
In post 638, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I don’t think FB flipping scum would equate Sakura scum based on FB’s play around the slot.
And that right there is an interesting post. Basically absolving Sakura from being mafia if FB flips scum. Why would you do that? How do you have any certainty that is the case?! It's a post of certainty, and I cannot understand how you can be so certain about them.

, , , , I'll come back to later as there's a lot to analyse in there for me.

Porkens vote in is odd.
In post 772, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Drew has been lacking too. He came, he left. And everyone forgot im.
Now you touch on me again. And not in the 'sexy Norwegian chick' kind of way.

You seem to like to shift focus at times when focus is on you.
In post 801, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:
In post 570, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:
In post 568, NoPowerOverMe wrote:More votes on the pig please.
Why?
In post 571, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Scumreading a townplayer(Quick)
In post 578, NoPowerOverMe wrote:
In post 575, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:For clarity: How do you know Quick is a townplayer?
He seems engaged and trying to gamesolve.
In post 576, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:And I just checked. He never even voted for Quick.
Quick could be scum...something’s making me hesitate though so it’s not strong
To me that's a scumread without saying it's a scumread.
So, NoPowerOverMe, you want(ed) more votes on Porkens because he is/was scumreading Quick, whom you assert is a town player. Is that an accurate representation of your thoughts?
This is accurate, but I think you're floating up the wrong shit show mate.

Porkens appears to be trying to trap people but not sure if that's scum hunting or trying to get townies lynched by their own rope.

In post 815, Drew-Sta wrote:Tl:dr - I think Nor, Sakura appear to be scum at this point. I think we need to wait for Farken and Pers to contribute before we can proceed much further.

VOTE: NorwegianboyEE

Pages 28-32 are odd and I need to go review again. CoolDog's entrance changed the games dynamic a bit. I have to sift through what they've posted better as my initial thoughts are it didn't read right in placed and also read very well in others.
You didn't even talk about Norwegian in this "wall" and it's not even like you are making a case or anything. -100 Town points.
That’s a complete misrep. Go back and reread it, because I’ve quoted and discussed Nor at least a half dozen times.
User avatar
Drew-Sta
Drew-Sta
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Drew-Sta
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1236
Joined: April 21, 2014

Post Post #992 (ISO) » Mon May 25, 2020 10:16 am

Post by Drew-Sta »

In post 977, NorwegianboyEE wrote:VOTE: Drew-sta
Does anyone townread him?
Yes, let’s fish for a consensus in a mislynch.
User avatar
NorwegianboyEE
NorwegianboyEE
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
NorwegianboyEE
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 24002
Joined: August 25, 2019
Location: Norway

Post Post #993 (ISO) » Mon May 25, 2020 10:20 am

Post by NorwegianboyEE »

You sure like saying the word "mislynch" a lot.
Like i think it's pretty obvious that my stance on your case about me and Sakura is that i think it's hot garbage, but sure. Keep framing it as OMGUS. See how far it will take you.
User avatar
NorwegianboyEE
NorwegianboyEE
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
NorwegianboyEE
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 24002
Joined: August 25, 2019
Location: Norway

Post Post #994 (ISO) » Mon May 25, 2020 10:22 am

Post by NorwegianboyEE »

You kept using the word "chainsaw" like it would absolve you from any responsibility. But your main argument against me didn't even make sense. Yet you kept pushing. Just makes me believe your entire case was made in bad faith and you never intended to solve or attempt to do anything other than scumread me.
User avatar
Sakura Hana
Sakura Hana
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Sakura Hana
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 26357
Joined: April 17, 2013
Location: In the Magical World of Anime

Post Post #995 (ISO) » Mon May 25, 2020 10:25 am

Post by Sakura Hana »

That was a case? I thought that was a catchup
I bloom in spring?
Please be nice to me.
User avatar
NorwegianboyEE
NorwegianboyEE
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
NorwegianboyEE
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 24002
Joined: August 25, 2019
Location: Norway

Post Post #996 (ISO) » Mon May 25, 2020 10:27 am

Post by NorwegianboyEE »

I guess you could say it was both.
User avatar
Quick
Quick
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Quick
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5781
Joined: October 11, 2017

Post Post #997 (ISO) » Mon May 25, 2020 10:28 am

Post by Quick »

In post 991, Drew-Sta wrote:That’s a complete misrep. Go back and reread it, because I’ve quoted and discussed Nor at least a half dozen times.
yeah, maybe you want to talk about AI stuff instead of whatever this is about Norwegian cuz he's Town. laziness isn't a Scum tell,"Basically absolving Sakura from being mafia if FB flips scum. Why would you do that?" why NOT do that? Seems pretty Townie to point that out actually because I actually think the exact same thing irt what Norwegian is saying about Sakura/Fire. In fact, that last thing is probably one of the Towniest things said itt and you are SRing them for it???
https://youtu.be/LRkYiRnRzY0

Wakie, wakie. Eggs and Bacie.
User avatar
Farkran
Farkran
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Farkran
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4070
Joined: August 16, 2019
Location: Italy

Post Post #998 (ISO) » Mon May 25, 2020 10:33 am

Post by Farkran »

I re-ISOed quick in light of the recent comments. There are some bits of progress in there, i guess i don't particularly like his playstyle and approach to scumhunting. I may let him live for today.

I also reread Drewsta and i am happier with my vote there. The ISO seems to be a load of questions without conclusions, his only scumread appears to be Norwegianboy which is meh at this point in the game, even i formed some factionality in my reads by being here less than 24 hours. I am known to form reads quickly, but even then there must be some middle ground.
Farkran is back poggers
-Alisae
User avatar
Kerset
Kerset
he/she
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Kerset
he/she
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3415
Joined: September 5, 2019
Pronoun: he/she
Location: Europe

Post Post #999 (ISO) » Mon May 25, 2020 10:37 am

Post by Kerset »

~
Locked