Mohab town. This is a lazy question.In post 1311, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Persivul, what are your actual reads right now?
What's the case on Drew?
Mohab town. This is a lazy question.In post 1311, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Persivul, what are your actual reads right now?
This just makes me think you are bad at playing mafia in general.In post 1347, Quick wrote:In post 1343, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Where did i strawman? What did i read wrong?In post 1346, Quick wrote:What part of "Town until proven otherwise" don't you get here?
You know, that’s a really good idea.In post 1351, CooLDoG wrote:I could see the quick scum and drew scum. But, the fact that you think quick is scum both ways should make you vote quick, right?
Because you're acting like Scum can't be caught on a catch up (For reference the person Ali said in the post that had a scummy catch up Flipped scum)In post 1346, Quick wrote:You are acting like I am speaking another language. Do you understand the idea of a catch up post or not? It's kinda like a formality that is sometimes done to get your feet wet before you take a dive. Is this a foreign concept to you or what? Maybe it's because you can hardly bother yourself to quote people let alone actually dissect things post by post.
What part of "Town until proven otherwise" don't you get here? Pressure for pressure's sake is a dumb ass fucking way to play...
His interactions are good and he shows a lot of controversy in his reads. I wouldn't be playing like that if I was Scum and I was him. If I was him and I was Scum I would try and sluff off and make Town eat themselves alive. But no. He actually gives a damn about trying to play the game. That might not be AI but I don't actually get the SRs on him. Like I said, I'll say it again I am sure -- His narrative is consistent. THAT is how you read a player like that. If their narrative changes, THEN you have every opportunity to case the living fuck out of him. But until his content drops to unthinkable levels of mindlessness, he's in the clear for being Town.In post 1345, NorwegianboyEE wrote:You were saying that you admit his catch up was bad and tradh, and now you’re doing some 9000 iq play where he is not scum for it because... reasons?
Good luck with that. You can't even understand my damn points, how the hell are you going to run me up other than manipulating idiotic Town and opportunistic Scum?In post 1354, NorwegianboyEE wrote:You know, that’s a really good idea.In post 1351, CooLDoG wrote:I could see the quick scum and drew scum. But, the fact that you think quick is scum both ways should make you vote quick, right?
VOTE: Quick
Because the case against him is fucking retarded.In post 1359, Porkens wrote:Why are you his lawyer?
Well i've talked about what has bugged me about Drew in my last few posts.In post 1350, Persivul wrote:What's the case on Drew?
Why?In post 1357, CooLDoG wrote:I'm contemplating voting porkins.
Interestingly both you and quick changed your vote after I asked a question like this. Just throwing that out there. DOn't know what to make of it.In post 1354, NorwegianboyEE wrote:You know, that’s a really good idea.In post 1351, CooLDoG wrote:I could see the quick scum and drew scum. But, the fact that you think quick is scum both ways should make you vote quick, right?
VOTE: Quick
It's mostly to do with his voting history. Drew makes the best points on it.In post 1364, Persivul wrote:Why?In post 1357, CooLDoG wrote:I'm contemplating voting porkins.
I just ISO'd nopower looking for a case on porkens and got nothing. Can you explain it to me?
p-edit: Quick, can you also explain the porkens case to me?
Lemme ask you this. Are his posts excusably bad or do they add value from a town perspective?In post 1361, Quick wrote:Because the case against him is fucking retarded.In post 1359, Porkens wrote:Why are you his lawyer?
This combined with TVing and not taking into account a wide range of playersIn post 1268, CooLDoG wrote:Damn! Got my timeline off. Good catch. Hmmm... I'll sleep on it.In post 1265, Drew-Sta wrote:I think at that point he'd started the wagon, then jumped off it, then jumped back on.In post 1262, CooLDoG wrote:@drew, so he hops on your wagon after the momentum starts, then it fizzles, and he goes back.
That bit doesn't ping me. What pings me is he was happy to flop about on a few other people, but the person he was drilling early on, he never voted for.
Why wouldn't you do that?!
Yes, I've read your ISO. I want to hear from norwee.In post 1363, Sakura Hana wrote:Well i've talked about what has bugged me about Drew in my last few posts.In post 1350, Persivul wrote:What's the case on Drew?
Don't think they are a "case" per se tho, just my general feelings about the slot.
There is no case on Pokins. People just don't like him. You can praise FB for that brilliant idea.In post 1364, Persivul wrote:p-edit: Quick, can you also explain the porkens case to me?