In post 748, QuantumQuasar wrote:Well since no other nicknames start with W for Wilson, B for Babolat, H for Head then your name starts with P for Prince
Given that he's at a tennis court then the racket is important in tennis, so I'd be looking for you
You're either the player or dealing with strings if you know what I mean and we'd have to be looking for the cow guts to make 'em instead talking about how 25kg is a proper tension when you would be either more innocent or more guilty.
In post 397, Quick wrote:As it is now, I like my vote until someone can explain how Poyzin's reaction there was actually Towny and not full of agenda and BS misreps.
When I saw this, it looked to me like Quick was setting up for a pivot. In 402 I tried baiting Quick with a reason to move away. It hadn't happened by 434 but I wanted to wait just in case. When Quick did move away from Poyzin, it was to QQ. I think there were more opportunistic places for him to put his vote if he was just looking to move away from Poyzin, and I was really surprised that he went from 122 to 455. Now we have 731 which is presumably about 722, and that was apparently strong enough to shake away the scumtell but more importantly moves Quick away from the Poyzin vote and is looking for reasons to place his vote on the next wagon.
VOTE: Quick
Quick was wagoned earlier in the day. Im not really keen on this vote given the current gamestate. The pressure has subsided on Quick and it seems a Quick lynch is unlikely for today.
There are already 2 wagons on GB and Jumble.
The single point of argument against quick that Marashu presents isnt going to get a wagon on him going.
Feels like a trivial vanity vote that will go nowhere.
Okay. I’ve been getting a gut feeling that Jumble has been prime mislynch potential. Not because of anything that Jumble has done per se, but the fact that nobody has came to their defense. While I think my ISO was good and showed how Jumble COULD be scum, the only scummy thing they really did was say they didn’t mind being lynched, and that is also something a discouraged townie would say. However, I noticed that Marashu was very much willing to join that wagon. I didn’t have a problem at the time with someone agreeing with me, but after seeing their Quick vote here, I realized that Marashu had been pretty opportunistic to join into the Jumble wagon. In addition, I don’t think their case on Quick was that strong either, but I feel like it was a strategic move because there had already been a case made on Quick, so it’s not like there wasn’t already traction. These are just rough thoughts about Marashu’s play. I plan on getting around to ISOing them.
As for GB, they’ve been mostly null and I haven’t been able to get behind their lynch yet. Maybe that changes later. Would like to hear from them first.
In post 397, Quick wrote:As it is now, I like my vote until someone can explain how Poyzin's reaction there was actually Towny and not full of agenda and BS misreps.
When I saw this, it looked to me like Quick was setting up for a pivot. In 402 I tried baiting Quick with a reason to move away. It hadn't happened by 434 but I wanted to wait just in case. When Quick did move away from Poyzin, it was to QQ. I think there were more opportunistic places for him to put his vote if he was just looking to move away from Poyzin, and I was really surprised that he went from 122 to 455. Now we have 731 which is presumably about 722, and that was apparently strong enough to shake away the scumtell but more importantly moves Quick away from the Poyzin vote and is looking for reasons to place his vote on the next wagon.
VOTE: Quick
Quick was wagoned earlier in the day. Im not really keen on this vote given the current gamestate. The pressure has subsided on Quick and it seems a Quick lynch is unlikely for today.
There are already 2 wagons on GB and Jumble.
The single point of argument against quick that Marashu presents isnt going to get a wagon on him going.
Feels like a trivial vanity vote that will go nowhere.
That’s because it is. It’s not uncommon for scum to stay off both of the competing wagons, that way they aren’t associated with the bus or the counterpush. I’ve done so a fair number of times myself.
In post 761, Poyzin wrote:Okay. I’ve been getting a gut feeling that Jumble has been prime mislynch potential. Not because of anything that Jumble has done per se, but the fact that nobody has came to their defense. While I think my ISO was good and showed how Jumble COULD be scum, the only scummy thing they really did was say they didn’t mind being lynched, and that is also something a discouraged townie would say. However, I noticed that Marashu was very much willing to join that wagon. I didn’t have a problem at the time with someone agreeing with me, but after seeing their Quick vote here, I realized that Marashu had been pretty opportunistic to join into the Jumble wagon. In addition, I don’t think their case on Quick was that strong either, but I feel like it was a strategic move because there had already been a case made on Quick, so it’s not like there wasn’t already traction. These are just rough thoughts about Marashu’s play. I plan on getting around to ISOing them.
As for GB, they’ve been mostly null and I haven’t been able to get behind their lynch yet. Maybe that changes later. Would like to hear from them first.
This is NOT the case why I think their scum. I haven’t made that case yet. I just view their recent actions to be sketchy and wouldn’t mind pushing for them.
Searching for a replacement for NotAJumbleOfNumbers.
Be civil.
[/area]
I will straight up disregard all reason if you have a PR dream again. You can come back and be like, “I dreamt that Locke is a N2 Bulletproof Multitasking Cop and Self-Targeting Doctor,” and I will go, “Okay, Locke kill it is then.”
In post 734, GeorgeBailey wrote:I'll be able to catch up in like 5 hours. 3/4 of my free time disappeared overnight which makes this a bit difficult.
Jumble disappearing kinda threw a wrench in my engagement on him so I'll pump out a reads list when I can. I'm holding my vote on Jumble since I wanna see what his replacement does.
In post 736, GeorgeBailey wrote:I know I'm at 3/5. Thats why I prodged with a content promiser. I cant build a case right now, but I'll probably switch when I write a reads list tonight.
Are we going to have to wait for another prodge to get this reads list?
@Poyzin, QQ is right. If you are refusing to vote George because he's not produced AI content, and thus sits as a null read for you, then you are promoting scum!George to continue prodging and outright not playing the game. You have given him no reason to produce the AI content you are waiting for.
In post 658, teacher wrote:Also that’s one heck of a lot of pages to wake up to - any TL/dr because I’m in class all day? Otherwise I will get back tonight.
Let's be real for a minute guys. George hasn't done anything yet. Marashu has done close to nothing. Teacher has largely fallen off the map since his early activity. QQ is a novelty alt account. Jumble's slot has been gone for nearly 2 days. At least 3 of those 5 slots are town. If we're going to win we need to pressure people to be active and contribute. Even if that means we spend the first 2/3rds of each day forcing people to contribute and we coalesce towards a lynch in the last 2-3 days, we'll be better off than if we don't vote inactives on the basis that they haven't given us a reason to read them one way or the other.
In post 751, LuckyLuciano wrote:QQ is a novelty account. The more you directly interact with him, the less sense he will make.
In post 769, LuckyLuciano wrote:Let's be real for a minute guys. George hasn't done anything yet. Marashu has done close to nothing. Teacher has largely fallen off the map since his early activity. QQ is a novelty alt account. Jumble's slot has been gone for nearly 2 days. At least 3 of those 5 slots are town. If we're going to win we need to pressure people to be active and contribute. Even if that means we spend the first 2/3rds of each day forcing people to contribute and we coalesce towards a lynch in the last 2-3 days, we'll be better off than if we don't vote inactives on the basis that they haven't given us a reason to read them one way or the other.
This is my only account ever on this website and not a novelty alt account. What you're trying to portray as some hoax or refutation of credibility from any post that you would take literally without the style of play in the sense that if you know for instance I'm talking about GB at tennis courts with racket brands and a correlation to turf which is situational instead of just semantics then it is game related because that's exactly the point to not be understood and pass a message.
I do not accept that you denigrate me and I don't accept that you define me, this account with your qualificative words to summarize and fit me in a box because I'm not in a cell you see and you seem to forget that liberty is not taken for granting, including the capacity to distort rules of logic
This isn't what I call passive aggressive play, you get a few townies acting like their alignment is neutral and just waiting on the trenches play to win and do your best instead of gerrymandering if you're meant to make mistakes on a forum posting messages then let it be but spare the explanations
