Newbie 2007: Air [game over!]
Forum rules
- QuantumQuasar
-
QuantumQuasar Goon
- QuantumQuasar
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: February 8, 2020
- LuckyLuciano
-
LuckyLuciano Mafia Scum
- LuckyLuciano
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2868
- Joined: March 1, 2020
I'm not changing my story. From the very moment I posted my catchup in 574 I made my reservation clear that I was not fully convinced of the Poyzin v Quick interaction being TvT, although I was leaning that way.In post 871, Quick wrote:Spoiler:
You're changing your story left and right here. Popular majority is NOT a real reason to think it's wrong. Scum can give that much and still be in good standing. Now it's you poking your fingers in that thinking it might be SvT.
I have given reasons why Marashu's unvote was not a good look independent of your alignment in 800. Again, not changing my story. Developing my reads over time isn't the same as being logically inconsistent.In post 871, Quick wrote:Marashu's unvote is only Scummy if I am Scum, and I'm not. Didn't you say earlier that you don't like to talk about associations so early in the game? So what gives? You are changing your story again here.
It's really not. You did nothing to pressure George into contributing more prior to him being at L-1. The moment he hit L-1 you appeared and declared intent. There are over 4 days left in the day phase and you are saying that his catchup isn't important because it is coming too late. You are trying to make him useless by lynching him before he can catch up. Also, policy lynches benefit scum.In post 871, Quick wrote:As far as me wanting to get rid of a useless player, that's NAI and you know it.- GeorgeBailey
-
GeorgeBailey He/HimGeorgeBailey
- GeorgeBailey
He/Him- GeorgeBailey
- GeorgeBailey
- Posts: 3400
- Joined: September 23, 2019
- Pronoun: He/Him
- Location: GeorgeBailey
- Contact:
In post 733, Quick wrote:The thing is...
I have GB as dead null. Why do I lynch a Null read here?
Someone sell me on GB...In post 817, Quick wrote:Just seems like an excuse to shade GB and get them lynched without actually taking the slot as a whole. What do you think of 622?
What changed in a day Quick?In post 827, Quick wrote:GB seems to be giving "too little to late" content. He might be Town here, but given how everyone else in the game is playing,Consider this Intent to hammer.- LuckyLuciano
-
LuckyLuciano
- QuantumQuasar
-
QuantumQuasar Goon
- QuantumQuasar
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: February 8, 2020
GeorgeBailey you were a moderator of a game and you referenced that game twice here disparagingly
The post activity shows how theoritically you speak on how scum does what and you delay on purpose, you just let chatter run in the background given that you also blocked by compartmentalizing concerns by bottling them up to not be bothered by them shows a level of disconnect that could make you a suspect because not so nifty purse carriers with blank lives are an excellent cover for a legal front
What if you are scum Lucky Luciano, have you ever considered that?
LL/GB are you appealing to emotion and empathy now factually the gameplay of GeorgeBailey is not acceptable in this game I'm going to request for a second opinion
Why aren't you prodded or bussed and why do you get a soft look and a leeway is that from perks you get for being elsewhere when your attention is not where it's meant to be at the grass roots level
Are you part of executive management to be so disconnected from the reality at the operational level GB?- LuckyLuciano
-
LuckyLuciano Mafia Scum
- LuckyLuciano
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2868
- Joined: March 1, 2020
@Datisi, can you prod teacher?Based onenough time should have passed to do so.
- LuckyLuciano
-
LuckyLuciano Mafia Scum
- LuckyLuciano
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2868
- Joined: March 1, 2020
You keep asking this. I know that I am not scum because I have read my role pm. What kind of backwoods question are you trying to ask?In post 879, QuantumQuasar wrote:What if you are scum Lucky Luciano, have you ever considered that?- QuantumQuasar
-
QuantumQuasar Goon
- QuantumQuasar
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: February 8, 2020
what is a mod and what is a killIn post 864, GeorgeBailey wrote:He's shitpushing me for the most asinine reasons.
Why are you trying to get me lynched so early?- Datisi
-
Datisi he/him, it/itsDrawn from Memory
- Datisi
he/him, it/its- Drawn from Memory
- Drawn from Memory
- Posts: 23603
- Joined: March 28, 2019
- Pronoun: he/him, it/its
- Location: Croatia
Right, my bad. Prodding teacher.I will straight up disregard all reason if you have a PR dream again. You can come back and be like, “I dreamt that Locke is a N2 Bulletproof Multitasking Cop and Self-Targeting Doctor,” and I will go, “Okay, Locke kill it is then.”~M- LuckyLuciano
-
LuckyLuciano
- Quick
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Quick
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
But you just said that it was because of popular consensus. That wasn't mentioned earlier. And you made ZERO mention of saying Poyzin and I was SvT in what you said about Poyzin and I. So that's just a lie unless you said it somewhere else in that post and I really don't want to read that wall rn. So unless you can prove otherwise, I will keep my vote on GB since it seems you don't want that lynch to go through so bad.In post 876, LuckyLuciano wrote:
I'm not changing my story. From the very moment I posted my catchup in 574 I made my reservation clear that I was not fully convinced of the Poyzin v Quick interaction being TvT, although I was leaning that way.In post 871, Quick wrote:Spoiler:
You're changing your story left and right here. Popular majority is NOT a real reason to think it's wrong. Scum can give that much and still be in good standing. Now it's you poking your fingers in that thinking it might be SvT.
Yeah, except you didn't actually give REASONS. You just said it was a bad look. So why are you trying to say you gave reasons there when you didn't and basically just shaded them?
I have given reasons why Marashu's unvote was not a good look independent of your alignment in 800. Again, not changing my story. Developing my reads over time isn't the same as being logically inconsistent.In post 871, Quick wrote:Marashu's unvote is only Scummy if I am Scum, and I'm not. Didn't you say earlier that you don't like to talk about associations so early in the game? So what gives? You are changing your story again here.
Except I am NEVER that sloppy as Scum. Go ahead and look at how I treat my Scum buddies. I am never going to just LOL jump on their wagon for next to no reason. Fact check me on that or don't use it as a point against me.
It's really not. You did nothing to pressure George into contributing more prior to him being at L-1. The moment he hit L-1 you appeared and declared intent. There are over 4 days left in the day phase and you are saying that his catchup isn't important because it is coming too late. You are trying to make him useless by lynching him before he can catch up. Also, policy lynches benefit scum.In post 871, Quick wrote:As far as me wanting to get rid of a useless player, that's NAI and you know it.- QuantumQuasar
-
QuantumQuasar Goon
- QuantumQuasar
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: February 8, 2020
Redirection to words. Takes one to know one. I didn't like the runaround because if you consider the dynamics just as 24 hours ago you didn't know Quick was at L-1 then you're putting a blank face because this is awfully prepared how you just decided to give another think at all this and delay even furtherIn post 881, LuckyLuciano wrote:
You keep asking this. I know that I am not scum because I have read my role pm. What kind of backwoods question are you trying to ask?In post 879, QuantumQuasar wrote:What if you are scum Lucky Luciano, have you ever considered that?
Compared to the L-1 on Quick and the L-1 and Jumble, I wasn't present at both, the unvotes were town aligned but your unvote was as good as teacher not voting while giving everyone another run around
This isn't a vote from wrath it's from substance and for a lack of substance then it's a front to be disregarded only to be regarded (agree to disagree) as if there wasn't enough contention already so you keep your subtlety on Marashu because he was present just earlier
and you pull up some pattern of Marashu behaving this way as scum from a previous game (yet again)In post 782, LuckyLuciano wrote:I'll have to reread those posts for context. Although, I think it's worthwhile that you bring up Jumble having been at L-1. It happened before I replaced in and fell apart around the time I did. I need to go back and look at that wagon again. I think my predecessor was on him, it'll probably be revealing if my SoP unvote was the first unvote at L-1.- LuckyLuciano
-
LuckyLuciano Mafia Scum
- LuckyLuciano
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2868
- Joined: March 1, 2020
You also never asked for reasons until it became relevant to you discrediting my thought progression. Prodging by unvoting an L-1 wagon is suspect to me. Not only does Marashu avoid contributing for another 36 hours by doing so, but there is scum motive both in distancing from a town!Quick mislynch, and in preventing a scum!Quick lynch. The town!Marashu motive would have to come from a reason to believe you are town that outweighs their prior reason to believe you are scum. Where did that occur?In post 885, Quick wrote:Yeah, except you didn't actually give REASONS. You just said it was a bad look. So why are you trying to say you gave reasons there when you didn't and basically just shaded them?- LuckyLuciano
-
LuckyLuciano Mafia Scum
- LuckyLuciano
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2868
- Joined: March 1, 2020
Nobody cares about your constant self-metaing.In post 885, Quick wrote:Except I am NEVER that sloppy as Scum. Go ahead and look at how I treat my Scum buddies. I am never going to just LOL jump on their wagon for next to no reason. Fact check me on that or don't use it as a point against me.- LuckyLuciano
-
LuckyLuciano Mafia Scum
- LuckyLuciano
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2868
- Joined: March 1, 2020
If I'm concerned that Quick v Poyzin may not be TvT, why do I have to also explicitly mention that SvT is a possibility? It's implied in me not 100% committing to the TvT read that I believe the interaction could possibly be 1 or either of SvT and SvS.In post 885, Quick wrote:But you just said that it was because of popular consensus. That wasn't mentioned earlier. And you made ZERO mention of saying Poyzin and I was SvT in what you said about Poyzin and I. So that's just a lie unless you said it somewhere else in that post and I really don't want to read that wall rn. So unless you can prove otherwise, I will keep my vote on GB since it seems you don't want that lynch to go through so bad.
Also, if you believe that I am redirecting today's lynch away from GB based on an ulterior motive, then that motive always says more about me being scum than GB, and you should be moving your vote to me.- QuantumQuasar
-
QuantumQuasar Goon
- QuantumQuasar
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: February 8, 2020
In post 886, QuantumQuasar wrote:
Redirection to words. Takes one to know one. I didn't like the runaround because if you consider the dynamics just as 24 hours ago you didn't know Quick was at L-1 then you're putting a blank face because this is awfully prepared how you just decided to give another think at all this and delay even furtherIn post 881, LuckyLuciano wrote:
You keep asking this. I know that I am not scum because I have read my role pm. What kind of backwoods question are you trying to ask?In post 879, QuantumQuasar wrote:What if you are scum Lucky Luciano, have you ever considered that?
Compared to the L-1 on Quick and the L-1 and Jumble, I wasn't present at both, the unvotes were town aligned but your unvote was as good as teacher not voting while giving everyone another run around
This isn't a vote from wrath it's from substance and for a lack of substance then it's a front to be disregarded only to be regarded (agree to disagree) as if there wasn't enough contention already so you keep your subtlety on Marashu because he was present just earlier
and you pull up some pattern of Marashu behaving this way as scum from a previous game (yet again)In post 782, LuckyLuciano wrote:I'll have to reread those posts for context. Although, I think it's worthwhile that you bring up Jumble having been at L-1. It happened before I replaced in and fell apart around the time I did. I need to go back and look at that wagon again. I think my predecessor was on him, it'll probably be revealing if my SoP unvote was the first unvote at L-1.
Case in point, LuckyLucianoIn post 785, LuckyLuciano wrote:Marashu, I don't like saying that activity is AI, partly because I understand how real life can get in the way of mafia, and partly because I don't have town meta from you to judge what your town activity looks like. However, you have consistently, as scum, disappeared until you have to get ready for work, promised content after work, and then disappeared again until you had to get ready for work again. Can I expect real content from you this evening?
How do you know this?
"you have consistently, as scum, disappeared until you have to get ready for work, promised content after work, and then disappeared again until you had to get ready for work again. Can I expect real content from you this evening"
you don't ask or give homework it's just how it is, imagine taking orders and instructions from some dude on a forum- QuantumQuasar
-
QuantumQuasar Goon
- QuantumQuasar
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: February 8, 2020
btw before you get all touchy feely with GB towards Quick keep some distance with the sensitivityIn post 889, LuckyLuciano wrote:
If I'm concerned that Quick v Poyzin may not be TvT, why do I have to also explicitly mention that SvT is a possibility? It's implied in me not 100% committing to the TvT read that I believe the interaction could possibly be 1 or either of SvT and SvS.In post 885, Quick wrote:But you just said that it was because of popular consensus. That wasn't mentioned earlier. And you made ZERO mention of saying Poyzin and I was SvT in what you said about Poyzin and I. So that's just a lie unless you said it somewhere else in that post and I really don't want to read that wall rn. So unless you can prove otherwise, I will keep my vote on GB since it seems you don't want that lynch to go through so bad.
Also, if you believe that I am redirecting today's lynch away from GB based on an ulterior motive, then that motive always says more about me being scum than GB, and you should be moving your vote to me.- Quick
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Quick
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
Quit trying to change the subject.In post 887, LuckyLuciano wrote:
You also never asked for reasons until it became relevant to you discrediting my thought progression.In post 885, Quick wrote:Yeah, except you didn't actually give REASONS. You just said it was a bad look. So why are you trying to say you gave reasons there when you didn't and basically just shaded them?
I see zero reason why that would be suspect.Prodging by unvoting an L-1 wagon is suspect to me.
Not only does Marashu avoid contributing for another 36 hours by doing so, but there is scum motive both in distancing from a town!Quick mislynch, and in preventing a scum!Quick lynch.
You are doing pre-flip here for VERY poor reasons since that just seems like playstyle to me. If I am Town, how would that change your view on Marashu?
Pot/kettleThe town!Marashu motive would have to come from a reason to believe you are town that outweighs their prior reason to believe you are scum. Where did that occur?
You say they are Scummy for unvoting me, but you're not Scummy for unvoting GB? Okay...
You want to show how it's constant? It's not. Only when it's valid. I've never lied about my meta.In post 888, LuckyLuciano wrote:
Nobody cares about your constant self-metaing.In post 885, Quick wrote:Except I am NEVER that sloppy as Scum. Go ahead and look at how I treat my Scum buddies. I am never going to just LOL jump on their wagon for next to no reason. Fact check me on that or don't use it as a point against me.
You didn't mention TvT either.In post 889, LuckyLuciano wrote:
If I'm concerned that Quick v Poyzin may not be TvT, why do I have to also explicitly mention that SvT is a possibility?In post 885, Quick wrote:But you just said that it was because of popular consensus. That wasn't mentioned earlier. And you made ZERO mention of saying Poyzin and I was SvT in what you said about Poyzin and I. So that's just a lie unless you said it somewhere else in that post and I really don't want to read that wall rn. So unless you can prove otherwise, I will keep my vote on GB since it seems you don't want that lynch to go through so bad.
Convenient..It's implied in me not 100% committing to the TvT read that I believe the interaction could possibly be 1 or either of SvT and SvS.
How about no because that's exactly what you want me to do. I am actually glad you brought this up so I can show just how much you don't want the lynch on GB to go through. The fact you even have to explicitly state that you don't want the GB lynch to go through says I am right where I should be.Also, if you believe that I am redirecting today's lynch away from GB based on an ulterior motive, then that motive always says more about me being scum than GB, and you should be moving your vote to me.- LuckyLuciano
-
LuckyLuciano Mafia Scum
- LuckyLuciano
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2868
- Joined: March 1, 2020
I played with Marashu in Newbie 2002. They were scum. They did the same thing.In post 890, QuantumQuasar wrote:Case in point, LuckyLuciano
How do you know this?
"you have consistently, as scum, disappeared until you have to get ready for work, promised content after work, and then disappeared again until you had to get ready for work again. Can I expect real content from you this evening"
you don't ask or give homework it's just how it is, imagine taking orders and instructions from some dude on a forum- Quick
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Quick
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
How about as Town?In post 893, LuckyLuciano wrote:
I played with Marashu in Newbie 2002. They were scum. They did the same thing.In post 890, QuantumQuasar wrote:Case in point, LuckyLuciano
How do you know this?
"you have consistently, as scum, disappeared until you have to get ready for work, promised content after work, and then disappeared again until you had to get ready for work again. Can I expect real content from you this evening"
you don't ask or give homework it's just how it is, imagine taking orders and instructions from some dude on a forum- LuckyLuciano
-
LuckyLuciano Mafia Scum
- LuckyLuciano
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2868
- Joined: March 1, 2020
I'm not going to respond to that post Quick. Maybe not not, maybe not ever. Skimming over it, it's very clear that you care little about logic, and I have no desire to stress myself out trying to convince someone who I think may be scum of why I hold the beliefs that I do. I'd rather wait for Teacher to come back, Jumble to be replaced, Marashu to re-emerge, etc.- Quick
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Quick
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
Also, GB disappeared. Whereisthat content anywyas?- LuckyLuciano
-
LuckyLuciano Mafia Scum
- LuckyLuciano
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2868
- Joined: March 1, 2020
The original quote,In post 894, Quick wrote:
How about as Town?In post 893, LuckyLuciano wrote:
I played with Marashu in Newbie 2002. They were scum. They did the same thing.In post 890, QuantumQuasar wrote:Case in point, LuckyLuciano
How do you know this?
"you have consistently, as scum, disappeared until you have to get ready for work, promised content after work, and then disappeared again until you had to get ready for work again. Can I expect real content from you this evening"
you don't ask or give homework it's just how it is, imagine taking orders and instructions from some dude on a forum
In post 785, LuckyLuciano wrote:Marashu, I don't like saying that activity is AI, partly because I understand how real life can get in the way of mafia, and partly because I don't have town meta from you to judge what your town activity looks like. However, you have consistently, as scum, disappeared until you have to get ready for work, promised content after work, and then disappeared again until you had to get ready for work again. Can I expect real content from you this evening?- Quick
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Quick
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
There's nothing stopping you from responding to it instead of giving ad hoc on why you don't want to respond to it.In post 895, LuckyLuciano wrote:I'm not going to respond to that post Quick. Maybe not not, maybe not ever. Skimming over it, it's very clear that you care little about logic, and I have no desire to stress myself out trying to convince someone who I think may be scum of why I hold the beliefs that I do. I'd rather wait for Teacher to come back, Jumble to be replaced, Marashu to re-emerge, etc.- LuckyLuciano
-
LuckyLuciano Mafia Scum
- LuckyLuciano
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2868
- Joined: March 1, 2020
- LuckyLuciano
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
- Quick
- LuckyLuciano
- Quick
- LuckyLuciano
- Quick
- LuckyLuciano
- Quick
- QuantumQuasar
- QuantumQuasar
- LuckyLuciano
- LuckyLuciano
- LuckyLuciano
- QuantumQuasar
- Quick
- Datisi
- QuantumQuasar
- LuckyLuciano
- LuckyLuciano
- QuantumQuasar
- GeorgeBailey
- LuckyLuciano
- QuantumQuasar