Newbie 2004: Trash Panada Hour. Redux! GAME OVER
Forum rules
- Blair
-
Blair Mafia Scum
- Blair
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2419
- Joined: October 4, 2013
- Location: Leavesden, Hertfordshire
- Blair
-
Blair Mafia Scum
- Blair
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2419
- Joined: October 4, 2013
- Location: Leavesden, Hertfordshire
Tuxedo also looks slightly townier for that post.“There is nothing so dangerous for anyone who has something to hide as conversation! A human being [...] cannot resist the opportunity to reveal himself and express his personality which conversation gives him. Every time he will give himself away.” -Hercule Poirot- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
In post 1748, BBmolla wrote:I'm on page 2, Lillith (now Dunn) is scum for helping in 40
Feather (Nauci) is town for townslipping
gibus is town for being excited and unafraid
former was kind of being a douche
gibus is fucking hilarious
howIn post 346, Freddiethelady wrote:also, I looked up noob on the mafiawiki page of abbreviations and couldn't find it. would someone explain what it means, please.
lilith is for sure scum
disgusting voteIn post 372, lilith2013 wrote:I think copykat's switch from defending gibus ("scum wouldn't be trying to out masons in this thread") to attacking a "scumslip" feel contrived to me, like he is trying to get on the bandwagon as fast as possible and needs something to attack gibus for. Typically I think scum are more likely to attack something like that so suddenly and aggressively.
VOTE: copykat
I think this is L-2Are we going to let this guy get away with this depth of reads?
- Blair
-
Blair Mafia Scum
- Blair
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2419
- Joined: October 4, 2013
- Location: Leavesden, Hertfordshire
Are you?
Press him on it. That post dubious #40 scumread might be a good place to start.“There is nothing so dangerous for anyone who has something to hide as conversation! A human being [...] cannot resist the opportunity to reveal himself and express his personality which conversation gives him. Every time he will give himself away.” -Hercule Poirot- Blair
-
Blair Mafia Scum
- Blair
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2419
- Joined: October 4, 2013
- Location: Leavesden, Hertfordshire
- gibus
-
gibus Goon
- gibus
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 486
- Joined: April 15, 2020
- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
So... you're not on board with my logic that there was no way votato would defend Freddie that way as scum? Why not?In post 1895, Blair wrote:Aloratom has felt somewhat "off" since I subbed in, but I need consultation because I can't decide if it's Aloratom being scum or Aloratom being Aloratom.- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
I'd rather everyone be allowed to answer for themselves and not get a blanket excuseIn post 1892, Tuxedo Mask wrote:@Nauci, I think it's just a long game with pages and pages of pretty toxic fighting that isn't even solving related. Just a bit of a slog to read.- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
@Gibus:
In post 1448, gibus wrote:
I'm scumreading Tuxedo's slot because of Copy.In post 1437, lilith2013 wrote:
Why are you scumreading Tuxedo and formerfish?In post 1434, gibus wrote:
UNVOTE: lilith2k13In post 1425, lilith2013 wrote: You said "for pressure." Okay, nausi already pressure voted me. I posted only once in the thread after that, so it should be obvious the "pressure" wasn't going to achieve anything. Like my inactivity was clearly not the result of people not paying attention to me in this thread, so why did/do you think that paying attention to me would change my lack of activity after nausi's pressure vote was already shown to not have an effect?
Your response to Nauci's pressure vote looked unsatisfactory, and I confused your inactivity with lurking as scum. I agree, my vote was hasty.
I don't understand how FF found Copybleeding town, and find it AI that he ignored my question.
His theory about how Fred was made to claim by his scum partner as a form of defence for not being the NK seems like a stretch because it is a really bad move by scum and I can see a newbtown make that kind of a mistake. But his insistence makes me wonder if he is the scum partner of Fred, and after successfully bussing and lynching Fred on D2, shift the focus on another townie for a mislynch to win the game. How is FF defending Copy different from votato defending Fred? Votato claims to know Fred IRL so that townread seems more plausible. I also find it weird that in the early stages of the game, FF says Copy's predecessor was statistically more probable to be scum, but still eliminates him in his PoE.In post 1674, gibus wrote:
There were differences. I townread feathers (your predecessor) and then townread your open mindedness towards scumhunting. FF ignored the possibility that Copy could be scum even though his reads were inconsistent like brassherald's, and had a bad post history. I found FF's early game suspicious too. I can't townread him yet without some information which won't be revealed anytime soon.In post 1640, Nauci wrote:
Gibus gave 4 town reads and cases on them, but has yet to respond to being called out by either of us for the inconsistent logic with which they town read me but scum read you, and I want an answer there before we end the day.In post 1638, Formerfish wrote:
Im not sure i know exactly what you have an issue with or what you want answered.In post 1629, Nauci wrote:
So... does the fact that she made that post on Day 1 change your view of that follow up?In post 1543, Formerfish wrote:
Listen, im stoned just about all the time, its the only thing that keeps the demons and voices at bay, so just be glad that i can string together a coherent thought in a single post for the most part without losing focus and making it a very different post.In post 1542, Nauci wrote:Retcon? Did you miss the post from Day 1 where Freddie super hammed it up that they were sheeping me on my meta-read of Brass?
Like, 1057 was so... extra? That I noted it as "is this scum absolving themselves of responsibility for voting for the lynch?" I commented on this in 1322 at start of day.
I think that Freddie is using your read on Waves and sheeping there as a reason to not have to explain the vote. What are you saying and how does it fundamentally differ from what im saying to the degree that this is what you stick on with me for some reason?
He was the backbone for wave's lynch, I agree, but that does not imply that he is town in any way.
Fred is a confused newbie, and I'm not surprised to see bad play coming from them. I am a newbie and I had the urge to make very questionable moves in my last game (as VT). I do not feel like Fred claiming VT for towncred is scummy. It can come from newbtown who wanted towncred seeing no other way of defending themselves. If Fred flips scum, then I'm inclined towards the possibility that FF is the partner. If Fred flips town, it does not imply that votato is scum, because votato formed his opinion based on a meta-read (they know each other IRL too).In post 1675, gibus wrote:
1) Formerfish is experienced and has a reputation for being good, so townreading him for stirring up activity doesn't make sense.In post 1643, Nauci wrote:
Went back to this post because I managed to forget it when the game turned into The PurgeIn post 1448, gibus wrote:
I'm scumreading Tuxedo's slot because of Copy.In post 1437, lilith2013 wrote:
Why are you scumreading Tuxedo and formerfish?In post 1434, gibus wrote:
UNVOTE: lilith2k13In post 1425, lilith2013 wrote: You said "for pressure." Okay, nausi already pressure voted me. I posted only once in the thread after that, so it should be obvious the "pressure" wasn't going to achieve anything. Like my inactivity was clearly not the result of people not paying attention to me in this thread, so why did/do you think that paying attention to me would change my lack of activity after nausi's pressure vote was already shown to not have an effect?
Your response to Nauci's pressure vote looked unsatisfactory, and I confused your inactivity with lurking as scum. I agree, my vote was hasty.
I don't understand how FF found Copybleeding town, and find it AI that he ignored my question.
His theory about how Fred was made to claim by his scum partner as a form of defence for not being the NK seems like a stretch because it is a really bad move by scum and I can see a newbtown make that kind of a mistake. But his insistence makes me wonder if he is the scum partner of Fred, and after successfully bussing and lynching Fred on D2, shift the focus on another townie for a mislynch to win the game. How is FF defending Copy different from votato defending Fred? Votato claims to know Fred IRL so that townread seems more plausible. I also find it weird that in the early stages of the game, FF says Copy's predecessor was statistically more probable to be scum, but still eliminates him in his PoE.
I have a few follow up question for you, Gibus:
1: Do you think that scum!Formerfish would be motivated to bethisactive and stir up this much activity? What, in your view, makes up the difference between FF's scum hunting and mine that cause you to scum read him but strongly town read me?
2: Once you check your math on the math of night kills and lynches for scum to win, do you still think it's plausible that FF would bus his teammate today? Do you believe his case on votato for why he switched there?
3: How has your read on Lilith evolved now that she has participated a lot more?
2) My math was off, but I still think it could be a bus attempt. Let me catch up on the votato case.
3) I feel good about her slot.
Gibus, your scumread on Formerfish seemed to depend a lot on the wild theory that him literally screaming for her head until the thread exploded was theater and was actually a bussing attempt. You're now saying that you town read Freddie and therefore have no interest in lynching Blair today even though you believe in my case... How does that compute for your read on Formerfish?!In post 1687, gibus wrote:In post 1683, Nauci wrote:
My question is basically, do you think that Formerfish and Osuka genuinely believe their theory that Freddie was being coached? If you scumread either of them, do you think it was an act?In post 1674, gibus wrote:My point is that the theory assumes a scum partner to have coached Fred into making an unnecessary move, which is an unnecessary move as scum. Who does "the people" refer to?
FF laid out a theory which factored in a scum coach which I find oddly specific. It makes sense if he was the one giving out instructions. That's why I'm inclined towards that possibility.In post 1684, Nauci wrote:
Huh?In post 1674, gibus wrote:TI can't townread him yet without some information which won't be revealed anytime soon.
Woahhhhhhh. I was with you for most of that until this bit. This would mean that the entirety of FF's pushes on Freddie, from the end of day 1 during which Freddie was -1 up through The Purge, was theater?In post 1674, gibus wrote:If Fred flips scum, then I'm inclined towards the possibility that FF is the partner.
I guess that answers 1683?- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
Why'd you hop off the Blair wagon
- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
Y'all hopping off of each others' wagons immediately as they become at all viable is making it real hard for me to town read you, yo
- gibus
-
gibus Goon
- gibus
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 486
- Joined: April 15, 2020
No, I SR FF regardless of Fred's alignment. The theory I laid out was speculation if Fred flipped scum, not a part of my SR on him.In post 1909, Nauci wrote: @Gibus:
Gibus, your scumread on Formerfish seemed to depend a lot on the wild theoryoutsmarts bullet- gibus
-
gibus Goon
- gibus
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 486
- Joined: April 15, 2020
- gibus
-
gibus
- gibus
-
gibus Goon
- gibus
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 486
- Joined: April 15, 2020
ebwopIn post 1913, gibus wrote:I don't understand Blair's intention in forming apower wagonon me. I really expected her to form better reads, but since she's insisting on lynching me without a good case, I retract what I said in #1889.outsmarts bullet- Blair
-
Blair Mafia Scum
- Blair
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2419
- Joined: October 4, 2013
- Location: Leavesden, Hertfordshire
"Hopping off" "as they become viable"?In post 1911, Nauci wrote:Y'all hopping off of each others' wagons immediately as they become at all viable is making it real hard for me to town read you, yo
What happened between when I joined the Dunn wagon and when I left it that made it more viable?
(Hint: Literally nothing, because the only thing that happened to the Dunn wagon during that time periodwasmy vote)
This was disingenuous.“There is nothing so dangerous for anyone who has something to hide as conversation! A human being [...] cannot resist the opportunity to reveal himself and express his personality which conversation gives him. Every time he will give himself away.” -Hercule Poirot- Blair
-
Blair Mafia Scum
- Blair
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2419
- Joined: October 4, 2013
- Location: Leavesden, Hertfordshire
What part of what I said above indicates what you said below?In post 1906, Nauci wrote:
So... you're not on board with my logic that there was no way votato would defend Freddie that way as scum? Why not?In post 1895, Blair wrote:Aloratom has felt somewhat "off" since I subbed in, but I need consultation because I can't decide if it's Aloratom being scum or Aloratom being Aloratom.“There is nothing so dangerous for anyone who has something to hide as conversation! A human being [...] cannot resist the opportunity to reveal himself and express his personality which conversation gives him. Every time he will give himself away.” -Hercule Poirot- gibus
-
gibus Goon
- gibus
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 486
- Joined: April 15, 2020
What happened to FF, your other scumread?
outsmarts bullet- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
You made it L-2. You knew that Dunn was my other scum read, and you knew Gibus was willing to lynch there, so it was risky to leave him at -2In post 1916, Blair wrote:
"Hopping off" "as they become viable"?In post 1911, Nauci wrote:Y'all hopping off of each others' wagons immediately as they become at all viable is making it real hard for me to town read you, yo
What happened between when I joined the Dunn wagon and when I left it that made it more viable?
(Hint: Literally nothing, because the only thing that happened to the Dunn wagon during that time periodwasmy vote)
This was disingenuous.- Blair
-
Blair Mafia Scum
- Blair
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2419
- Joined: October 4, 2013
- Location: Leavesden, Hertfordshire
This is one of the grossest quote cherry picks I have ever seen.gibus wrote:What happened to FF, your other scumread?
It's abundantly clear from that post (all the important parts you cut out of it without indicating that you had done so) that I am consolidating wagons due to the impending deadline. No one was, or is, voting for FormerFish/Battle Mage. So unless you are indicating you are suddenly interested in cobbling a Battle Mage together in the next 24 hours (this would be a stunning development on your part), it is not at all clear why you even made this post.What a strange post.
“There is nothing so dangerous for anyone who has something to hide as conversation! A human being [...] cannot resist the opportunity to reveal himself and express his personality which conversation gives him. Every time he will give himself away.” -Hercule Poirot- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
Why speculate on votato's rep if you agree votato is definitely town?In post 1917, Blair wrote:
What part of what I said above indicates what you said below?In post 1906, Nauci wrote:
So... you're not on board with my logic that there was no way votato would defend Freddie that way as scum? Why not?In post 1895, Blair wrote:Aloratom has felt somewhat "off" since I subbed in, but I need consultation because I can't decide if it's Aloratom being scum or Aloratom being Aloratom.- Blair
-
Blair Mafia Scum
- Blair
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2419
- Joined: October 4, 2013
- Location: Leavesden, Hertfordshire
Check the time stamps on those posts you're referring to.In post 1919, Nauci wrote:You made it L-2. You knew that Dunn was my other scum read, and you knew Gibus was willing to lynch there, so it was risky to leave him at -2
Are you suggesting it was my dastardly scum plan to place Dunnstral at L-2 for five nanoseconds, then freak out and unvote?“There is nothing so dangerous for anyone who has something to hide as conversation! A human being [...] cannot resist the opportunity to reveal himself and express his personality which conversation gives him. Every time he will give himself away.” -Hercule Poirot- Blair
-
Blair Mafia Scum
- Blair
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2419
- Joined: October 4, 2013
- Location: Leavesden, Hertfordshire
I don't make up my mind 100% about a slot based on a single interaction and then never assess that slot again.In post 1921, Nauci wrote:
Why speculate on votato's rep if you agree votato is definitely town?In post 1917, Blair wrote:
What part of what I said above indicates what you said below?In post 1906, Nauci wrote:
So... you're not on board with my logic that there was no way votato would defend Freddie that way as scum? Why not?In post 1895, Blair wrote:Aloratom has felt somewhat "off" since I subbed in, but I need consultation because I can't decide if it's Aloratom being scum or Aloratom being Aloratom.
Do you?“There is nothing so dangerous for anyone who has something to hide as conversation! A human being [...] cannot resist the opportunity to reveal himself and express his personality which conversation gives him. Every time he will give himself away.” -Hercule Poirot- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
In post 1915, gibus wrote:ebwopIn post 1913, gibus wrote:I don't understand Blair's intention in forming apower wagonon me. I really expected her to form better reads, but since she's insisting on lynching me without a good case, I retract what I said in #1889.
I'm sorry can you tl;dr me the other reasons for your read on Fish because I ISOed you and I see tons of your posts scumreading FF, sheeping him and I to vote for Brass, then mostly talk about him speculating about Freddie on Day 2. When and why did you go from scumreading him to willing to sheep him then back to scumreading? - Nauci
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
- Blair
- Blair
- Nauci
- Blair
- Nauci
- gibus
- Blair
- Blair
- gibus
- gibus
- gibus
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Dunnstral
- Nauci
- Nauci
- gibus
- Blair
- Blair
- Dunnstral
- Blair
- Blair