In post 1958, gibus wrote:sorry
maybe you were a better lynch than Nauci anyway.
Well, I didn't like how you started day 1, and my town read of you at the end of day 1 was me also saying that the improvement in your play felt weird. As for day 2, I feel more and more with the emotions and hurt feelings from Fish, Votato, and Freddie that it was TvTvT (Osuka's contributions and emotions still feel inauthentic though) and I feel suspicious of the players who sat back while that situation grew out of control. Since that whole thing is very advantageous to scum. Also, you and Nacui flailing over the last pages didn't look great.In post 1905, gibus wrote:@Tuxedo
If I'm not wrong, you said I had a scummy start but pinged town as the game progressed.
Where is the scumread coming from?
A post full of wisdom.In post 1979, Tuxedo Mask wrote:Well, I didn't like how you started day 1, and my town read of you at the end of day 1 was me also saying that the improvement in your play felt weird. As for day 2, I feel more and more with the emotions and hurt feelings from Fish, Votato, and Freddie that it was TvTvT (Osuka's contributions and emotions still feel inauthentic though) and I feel suspicious of the players who sat back while that situation grew out of control. Since that whole thing is very advantageous to scum. Also, you and Nacui flailing over the last pages didn't look great.In post 1905, gibus wrote:@Tuxedo
If I'm not wrong, you said I had a scummy start but pinged town as the game progressed.
Where is the scumread coming from?
So I feel good about this vote.
Also, Dunnstral pointing out the Osuka slot seemed pretty clearly in response to me saying they'd be my top pick. So I town read that, and have a weird ping against those who FOS'd it. But yeah, Dunnstral you should join the Gibus wagon instead.
I'm already in Blair's deep pockets with Nauci, I'm sorry.In post 1980, Battle Mage wrote:A post full of wisdom.
I still love you...In post 1981, Tuxedo Mask wrote:I'm already in Blair's deep pockets with Nauci, I'm sorry.In post 1980, Battle Mage wrote:A post full of wisdom.
If you're referring to his why's I already answered them, he just didn't read my postsIn post 1957, Nauci wrote:With this little time left, maybe less fluff posting!
BBM I think Dunn had some questions for you
how about a deal that if Gibus flips town, we'll do one of those tomorrow?In post 1984, BBmolla wrote:Dude honestly it's probably just Dunnstral/Tuxedo, Tuxedo's posts are nonsense
I'm always confident, seldom right.In post 1986, BBmolla wrote:You're that confident my dude
You gave reasons to push there, not to scum read. Little late in the day to start that.In post 1973, Dunnstral wrote:I gave reasons, look a few posts back.
You'd be voting a viable lynch rather than a vanity wagon though, wouldn't you?In post 1974, Battle Mage wrote:So you're saying Dunnstral didn't want to be lynched, and is therefore scum? come on man, even I'd be voting for BBMola rather than myself!In post 1972, Aloratom wrote:In my skimming catch-up of last night's posts, this one caught my eye. I greatly dislike it. It came after Blair had taken Dunnstral to L-2 and then backed off, so Dunnstral at that point was not only aware that Blair was willing to vote him, he was also aware that I was willing to vote him and that Nauci was willing to vote him. Rather than make an argument or reiterate an argument for voting BBmola/osuka, he just slides in there that this is the osuka slot as if that should be enough to garner votes for BBmola. To me it does something different -- I think he's trying to divert votes away from Dunnstral. If he wanted us to vote for BBmola he would have given reasons therefor.
This is a bullshit accusation; it's both a legitimate motive to think that high information lynches are good, and something I've been talking about since the end of day 1 (1006, 1383, 1621).In post 1963, Battle Mage wrote:Freddie feels like a soft easy mislynch to be pushing, but I think Nauci kinda missed the boat and is now desperately trying to resuscitate some interest in it. Trying to justify as an "informative flip" now to cover her back for when he flips town?In post 1951, Nauci wrote:I mean, at the time of the claim, I didn't know what to make of it other than ??????
But there were SO many posts after that which were just so implausible. Like at some point, the lack of necessity to claim was pointed out to her, yet she kept making posts over and over as if she was imminently dead. I have a harder time buying her explanation about scum not knowing who town are, that she could possibly have THAT incorrect an understanding of the game mechanics, to explain her scummy, LAMIST posts as if she was 100% going to be night killed. Mostly though, I view with just... confusion and disbelief, and not super alignment indicative. It wasn't until Blair's behavior that I truly scumread the slot. I do think that it has a LOT of associatives information that would make it an informative flip.
What about you? Do you agree with your predecessor?
Still think Nauci is scum, but would happily lynch Gibus over Blair.
Why did you think her replace-in post sucked to the point of being scummy?In post 1749, BBmolla wrote:Blair's replace in post sucks, that slot is probably scum
Dunn/Blair gg
I'm still reading I'mon page 20
Which of Tuxedo's posts do you think are nonsense?In post 1984, BBmolla wrote:Dude honestly it's probably just Dunnstral/Tuxedo, Tuxedo's posts are nonsense
What do you mean by flailing here?In post 1979, Tuxedo Mask wrote:Also, you and Nacui flailing over the last pages didn't look great.
I can see this, I guess. I was previously reading it as an OMGUS thing but took another look at that page and this makes more sense.In post 1979, Tuxedo Mask wrote:Also, Dunnstral pointing out the Osuka slot seemed pretty clearly in response to me saying they'd be my top pick. So I town read that, and have a weird ping against those who FOS'd it. But yeah, Dunnstral you should join the Gibus wagon instead.