don't be afraid to gobble away like the magnificent turkey you are. there is nothing mafia fear more than a rabid bird juiced up on adrenaline.In post 97, gobbledygook wrote:But yes, probably. I try not to needle people too intensely because people do not like it.
What makes you think I am chainsaw defending you?In post 99, Espeonage wrote:I however on the opposite side don't like this weird as chainsaw shit going on with gobbles either, so there's that too.
Wagons are good to move the game forward. Might I suggest a better player to wagon? Flippy is a lurker and when he is here he posts cash gifs, but other than that pressure on him doesn’t do much.In post 100, Hoopla wrote:having said that, please specify why you are jumping on the EFN wagon with me and notscience.
cooing sweet nothings about bandwagons is music to my ears, but don't think you're getting in the town bloc that easily.In post 101, gobbledygook wrote:Wagons are good to move the game forward. Might I suggest a better player to wagon? Flippy is a lurker and when he is here he posts cash gifs, but other than that pressure on him doesn’t do much.
Many moons, but not that many years.In post 68, Hoopla wrote:it's been many moons since i've dipped my toes in the mafia waters. perhaps even years. i don't remember which game(s) we've played together.
If his claim were real, the probability is on my side. The chance that both hit the same target, assuming random, is less than 10%. Town would not seriously claim a role that they are not (a premise I hold.. reasonable considering d1 on page 1). If he is town fake claiming a night1 vig he deserves to get lynched period because what benifit does town get from the gambit? There is no reason for town to fake claim vig, but if people like you are will to not lynch him given evidence against his claim, then scum have a lot to gain. If we take your logic, then scum can just claim that d1 every game and coast with one "conf town" player. If you claim night1 vig, and there is one kill, you ought to lynch the person who claimed barring a cc. Tl;dr, lynch people who claim something without a cc when the night actions don't bare out what they claim. Pretty fucking reasonable.In post 94, AGar wrote:
Two, CD taking the bait and saying "if there's one kill, Espe is the lynch," while dumb, seems weak at best. Just plain dumb. Another shady inclusion.
Okay, remember that my response to agar is assuming his claim is a real claim, which I took it to be. He has renounced the claim before the night phase, so what I say does NOT apply.In post 45, Emperor flippyNips wrote:rvs doesn't mean posting, its a random vote & i will not be making one of those today
i'm a new playerIn post 53, Emperor flippyNips wrote:are you a alt Gypyx or are you new to these parts?
I kinda like these posts from Agar here, even if the reasoning is quite weak, it looks like he's geniuenly beliving in what he's sayingIn post 85, AGar wrote:In post 75, gobbledygook wrote:What is scummy about what Espeonage said?I mean it's part joking because it's Page 3 so there's not tons to go off of but I thought it was shady to go "Hey they're night planning, that's scummy" after a meme claim.In post 78, Hiraki wrote:Would love an explanation here, unless it's just a jokeIn post 70, AGar wrote:Hi Scum.In post 37, Espeonage wrote:Currently I have cooldog and notsci as potential scum for going in to night prep immediately. Seems like a scum thing to focus on right now no?
Vote: Cooldog
VOTE: Espeonage
<3
So it's like 50/50 on how serious I am.
and here, i'm kind of suspicious of the fact that gooble kind of sets himself up to be able to lurk later on, or at least not produce meaningful contentIn post 91, gobbledygook wrote:Why do you want to vote Espeonage?In post 84, notscience wrote:I’d noticed you hadn’t really said anything else about the other questions but I was interested in the agar question because frankly, if I wasn’t sheeping hoopla I probably would have voted Espeonage too.
What is scummy about thinking nightplanning is scummy?In post 85, AGar wrote:I mean it's part joking because it's Page 3 so there's not tons to go off of but I thought it was shady to go "Hey they're night planning, that's scummy" after a meme claim.
In post 88, notscience wrote:I actually took Espeonages post half serious is what that meant.
I was just interested in heading off that pattern bc I’m trying to see more of the reason behind the questions. And then you said it’s not how you play so I’ve pretty much resigned to wait for your takes to come in after people start playingYou want to head off the pattern of me asking questions? I will push things that I think are scummy in real time. It isn't like I just sit there and ask questions.But as far as having all my thoughts or a fully transparent thought process, you'll never get that from me.
Generally, I do not like to insert my opinion on things. During sociological research, researchers try not to interfere with their subjects, so that their data is not tainted by outside influence. That's what I do more or less.
VOTE: Gypx
Just to add to this (as I worry it may slip by), this very much feels like CD is saying "If there's only one kill Espe must be scum" and trying to control day two... based on what has been well discussed as a meme fake claim at this stage. Agar is right to call it out.In post 94, AGar wrote:Two, CD taking the bait and saying "if there's one kill, Espe is the lynch," while dumb, seems weak at best. Just plain dumb. Another shady inclusion.
Seems like a hell of a way to prod-dodge the entire game and write it off as "I said I was doing this at the start of the game".In post 98, AGar wrote:Seems like a hell of a way to convince the rest of us of your lynch preferences.In post 97, gobbledygook wrote:I do realize that I am playing a social deduction game called mafia. I guess I am not explaining myself fully. I will vote people I think are scummy. I may give some reasoning for voting said person. That reasoning/explanation most likely will not be all my thoughts about said person.In post 95, AGar wrote:You do realize you're a part of this game and thus it necessitates your interaction with everyone, right?
![:]](./images/smilies/icon_smiling.png "Cheerful Smile"){kind=icon}
What do you mean by this? I can't vote for you both?In post 117, notscience wrote:So for my clarification- talking about espe but not voting him?
Do you think that what I have contributed so far is prod dodge worthy?In post 112, PranaDevil wrote:Seems like a hell of a way to prod-dodge the entire game and write it off as "I said I was doing this at the start of the game".
Same question to you. Do you think my contributions so far are lurking contributions?In post 111, Gypyx wrote:and here, i'm kind of suspicious of the fact that gooble kind of sets himself up to be able to lurk later on, or at least not produce meaningful content
