In post 1117, Tuxedo Mask wrote:
Because I don't think clipping those things out of context accurately represents the back and forth Kilga had with Koba. They were things that allegedly stuck out to PP on their read through, and he pushed that. Koba reacted, and the back and forth that followed seemed to be what strengthed PP's read of that slot.
-snip-
As for the things you quoted regarding yourself they said they were pings. If it was the core of their read on you then it would be different, but it's just stuff that stuck out to them. Again this just feels like how PP engages with the game, pushing stuff that gut ping them and growing from there.
I get that they're things that "stuck out" to PP with Koba and myself. My point is that none of them were/are scummy things, but PP was/is presenting them as such anyway. I also still don't know what PP's core argument against me is despite pointing out once already that I didn't know what it was. N3R said something similar to this but didn't elaborate on what they think PP's core argument against me is. What would you say it is? Note that PP was demonstrably unhappy with me before
943; I would like you, or PP, or N3R, to produce the reason for that pre-943 unhappiness that is something I didn't list in 1003.
In post 1117, Tuxedo Mask wrote:What does scum PP have to gain joining the game hours before the deadline seeing the wagons are Hoctac and CJ/Enomis and picking a fight with Koba? Trying to fight the flow of the game seems way more town motivated than scum motivated. Even if Hocatac or CJ/Enomis were their partner, it would be easier to just support the opposing wagon over trying to start a whole new one.
Starting a fight with someone that was not in meaningful danger of getting lynched avoids having to come up with a meaningful opinion of which of the two main vote-getters is worse, and in fact can possibly ultimately avoid having to vote for either of them. Like, if scum can get a townie lynched without voting for them, that's pretty good for them, since they don't have to answer for being wrong.
In post 1117, Tuxedo Mask wrote: In post 1003, Kilgamayan wrote:That's a whole lot of bad accusations from where I'm sitting. What good arguments would you say PP has made that make you think PP is town, outside of the piggybacking on the efforts of others against me?
Could you show what you're talking about here?
I'm not sure exactly what the confusion is. If you can clarify that I'll be happy to oblige.
In post 1117, Tuxedo Mask wrote:P.S. your post would be easier to follow if you linked to why they were factually incorrect or explained it, rather than just linking to the incorrect post.
Sure.
In post 1003, Kilgamayan wrote:Justifying Hoctac/Kilga scum team feeling by citing Hoctac not tcaring about my lynch order:
926 (factually incorrect)
Correction: My summary statement here should say "claim order" rather than "lynch order". (926 refers to "claim order" so hopefully it was still clear what I meant.)
Anyway, I posted my preferred claim order in
864, and Hoctac went on to try to administrate/organize claim orders in
874. Hoctac did not ask me for mine because mine was already posted. I mention this in 962 but I suppose it was not as clear and direct as this statement now.
In post 1003, Kilgamayan wrote:Justifying Hoctac/Kilga scum team feeling by citing ping from us being the last two claims:
927 (factually incorrect)
Hoctac claims in
883, PP claimed in
885, I claimed in
888. Note that I point this out in
938.
