In post 983, Albert B. Rampage wrote:You are better off voting for someone who isn't being defended by all the good players (Firebringer, FL, Sakura, etc.).
Operant Conditioning
In post 986, Looker wrote:Something is confusing me about Blair: If she was sitting on the information of her interpretation of my actions this whole time, why vote now? Nothing has changed except me asking her to clarify.
When you asked me to compile my lists of player behaviors, the act of doing so helped me recognize Gobbles was a higher townread than I had realized.
When you asked me to elaborate on the names in my Fake Scumhunting list, the act of doing so helped me recognize you were a higher scumread than I had realized.
It's kind of like the phenomenon where votes start moving around more right after a votecount is posted. Compiling information in one place often leads to reevaluation.
In post 989, iamausername wrote:pop quiz everybody: without checking, can you tell me who gobbledygook is voting for right now? do you remember any of the votes gobbledygook has made in this game? if no, why do you think that is?
He is voting for ABR. Before that, I know he has moved it around 3-4 times but I can't say where with confidence without checking. As for why that is, I will admit many of his posts have been forgettable - which could be indicative of trying to blend in, but it doesn't outweigh my townread on him. It's something to watch for moving forward, for sure.
In post 1002, Flair wrote:@Blair
When you say tunneling, what exactly do you mean? I think we may have different definitions of the word.
In this case I am not using the term to mean you are ignoring other people (which you have demonstrably not been doing) but to mean you are ignoring other types of evidence - i.e. you made up your mind about Firebringer based on your very first interaction with him, and most of what followed after has looked like confirmation bias.
At the time I am writing this you appear to have meaningfully reevaluated him, so that's good.
In post 1004, Flair wrote:If the game is as basic as eliminating the players blending in, instead of misleading the conversation, then I'll gladly vote into that playergroup. Perhaps I'm giving you all too much credit. I play regularly with wolves who top-post and misdrect. I am also one of those wolves.
This schtick is getting old. There is plenty of nuance here, and there are plenty of powerwolves. Don't let him fool you there. Catch Albert in the right mood and he will admit he has been known to be such a player himself.
Light townread for this post because you insisted you have charisma and that you can powerwolf - I believe you are smart enough to know how beneficial it is to be underestimated, so I don't see scum!Flair throwing that away for ego.
In post 1016, Flair wrote:But if that’s the case, I’ll learn to play within those confines. So long as no one (*cough* FB *cough*) presumes I’m alienating players just because I ask them to share as many thoughts as possible. I’m engaging with as many of you as possible because I care.
I feel like you aren't trying very hard to understand what Firebringer was saying there (which more likely tells me something about your opinion of him as a player than as a slot). He wasn't saying you were being mean or anything along those lines, he was saying you have been relatively aggressive with most players, which brings attention to yourself - our brains interpret whatever is focal to be important, which in this case often results in scumreads.
He's saying that there is a certain (pretty common) type of scum that avoids doing what you are doing, and he has ruled you out of that group.