Could you explain this?In post 1263, skitter30 wrote:Also if ss were scum i'd expect multiple scum to be on the original gobble wagon
I think I get where you're coming from, I just want to be sure.
Could you explain this?In post 1263, skitter30 wrote:Also if ss were scum i'd expect multiple scum to be on the original gobble wagon
Hello.In post 1599, Bingle wrote:Fair. All of my scum prospects are weak reads though. I'm pretty sure I'm mostly right on townreads, but the people who could be scum are all frustratingly nullish.
Maybe I'm just not going to get a read I'm sure enough about to lynch over gobbles.
I do want to hear from Blake about the state of the game and Chemslot about pretty much anything though.
Well 8/12 people who are not me have voted for me so... everyone.In post 1605, Blake Belladonna wrote:Gobbledygook looks like a copout lynch that scum are abusing. Who has been advocating for him to be the day one lynch?
Quite a few people. Even I was on the wagon at one time.In post 1605, Blake Belladonna wrote:It's really interesting how people are starting to claim that their reads are solidifying, yet the votes are still this spread out.
Gobbledygook looks like a copout lynch that scum are abusing. Who has been advocating for him to be the day one lynch?
the names i gave above are the ones advocating for itIn post 1611, Blake Belladonna wrote:Voting for Gobbledygook does not equate to advocating for it.
Interesting.In post 1609, skitter30 wrote:oh mariar too
Yeah, that's kinda what I thought you were getting at.In post 1601, skitter30 wrote:like they see their partners are doing x, so they throw shade on the people not doing x to validate what their partners are doing, if that makes sense
How do you define a lolkill?In post 1615, skitter30 wrote:gobble would you make a lolkill tonight?
Gobbles was L-1 before the SK reveal.In post 1616, Blake Belladonna wrote:Scum are most likely to be in the rest of the votes, especially ones that suddenly appeared after the SK reveal.
there isn't really anybody who fits taht description i think? nobody joined the wagon except for fire and he didn't know gobble claimed skIn post 1616, Blake Belladonna wrote:Interesting.In post 1609, skitter30 wrote:oh mariar too
Scum are most likely to be in the rest of the votes, especially ones that suddenly appeared after the SK reveal. Bonus points if they have a very low content to noise ratio.
Killing Bingle.In post 1618, gobbledygook wrote:How do you define a lolkill?In post 1615, skitter30 wrote:gobble would you make a lolkill tonight?
someone who is consensus townread or has the potential to be in the next day or soIn post 1618, gobbledygook wrote:How do you define a lolkill?In post 1615, skitter30 wrote:gobble would you make a lolkill tonight?
Killing Skitter.In post 1621, Bingle wrote:Killing Bingle.In post 1618, gobbledygook wrote:How do you define a lolkill?In post 1615, skitter30 wrote:gobble would you make a lolkill tonight?
In post 1619, Bingle wrote:Gobbles was L-1 before the SK reveal.In post 1616, Blake Belladonna wrote:Scum are most likely to be in the rest of the votes, especially ones that suddenly appeared after the SK reveal.
There were unvotes after, but I don't think anyone jumped on.
I'd have to double check to determine who is in the gobbles must die vs gobbles must vig camps.
That's where I would look first.In post 1620, skitter30 wrote:there isn't really anybody who fits taht description i think? nobody joined the wagon except for fire and he didn't know gobble claimed skIn post 1616, Blake Belladonna wrote:Interesting.In post 1609, skitter30 wrote:oh mariar too
Scum are most likely to be in the rest of the votes, especially ones that suddenly appeared after the SK reveal. Bonus points if they have a very low content to noise ratio.
i think taht there's at least one scum in that least of names