Mini Normal 2148 (Post Game)

Normal Games (With basic roles and standard mechanics) Signups Here
Forum rules
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #75 (ISO) » Fri Jun 12, 2020 4:42 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 68, Green Crayons wrote:also obviously mala's suspicion of votato is bad, and her back-burner nonsense is silly, but lol nonetheless at farside and notscience
Oh i missed Dunnstral. You're on the lol list too.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #76 (ISO) » Fri Jun 12, 2020 4:47 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 74, notscience wrote:But no seriously I think her mala read makes decent sense especially given the info available thus far
Ew. No.
In post 60, farside22 wrote:I haven't moved my vote off of her.
I don't like how she has already attached a scum read off of 2 players based on a video game. Seems like a stretch to me.
And if she has that scum read/feeling why did she vote for NS instead of one of you?
So in all I'd say scum read.
First line is null.
Second line translates to "mala not getting SW reference, and therefore wrongly suspecting connection between two players, is scummy"
Third line translates "mala didn't vote switch quickly enough within the span of a few pages"
Fourth line claims scum read on page 3.

Bleck.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
notscience
notscience
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
notscience
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 22322
Joined: March 25, 2013
Location: Cobra Kai

Post Post #77 (ISO) » Fri Jun 12, 2020 4:52 pm

Post by notscience »

It’s an rvs read it doesn’t have to be a damning case lol
Show
STRIKE HARD

STRIKE FAST

NO MERCY
User avatar
Dunnstral
Dunnstral
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Dunnstral
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 37035
Joined: April 2, 2016

Post Post #78 (ISO) » Fri Jun 12, 2020 4:53 pm

Post by Dunnstral »

Stop telling me what it doesn't have to be
User avatar
notscience
notscience
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
notscience
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 22322
Joined: March 25, 2013
Location: Cobra Kai

Post Post #79 (ISO) » Fri Jun 12, 2020 4:55 pm

Post by notscience »

In post 78, Dunnstral wrote:Stop telling me what it doesn't have to be
Welcome to the real world
Show
STRIKE HARD

STRIKE FAST

NO MERCY
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #80 (ISO) » Fri Jun 12, 2020 4:56 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 77, notscience wrote:It’s an rvs read it doesn’t have to be a damning case lol
It's a made-up suspicion that falls apart when you realize it's based on suspecting Mala for not getting the SW reference.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Dunnstral
Dunnstral
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Dunnstral
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 37035
Joined: April 2, 2016

Post Post #81 (ISO) » Fri Jun 12, 2020 4:58 pm

Post by Dunnstral »

In post 62, Malakittens wrote:
In post 59, Dunnstral wrote:VOTE: Malakittens

You are mafia
Por que?
I don't like the way you went about the early game, votato + hk50, and then the notscience vote
User avatar
Dunnstral
Dunnstral
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Dunnstral
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 37035
Joined: April 2, 2016

Post Post #82 (ISO) » Fri Jun 12, 2020 4:59 pm

Post by Dunnstral »

In post 73, Green Crayons wrote:Seems within a reasonable band of emotion if she's not lying that she didn't get the reference that apparently the rest of the player set did.
I didn't get the reference
User avatar
notscience
notscience
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
notscience
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 22322
Joined: March 25, 2013
Location: Cobra Kai

Post Post #83 (ISO) » Fri Jun 12, 2020 5:00 pm

Post by notscience »

I don’t think we’re likely to agree on this so I’m just gonna agree to disagree
Show
STRIKE HARD

STRIKE FAST

NO MERCY
User avatar
notscience
notscience
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
notscience
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 22322
Joined: March 25, 2013
Location: Cobra Kai

Post Post #84 (ISO) » Fri Jun 12, 2020 5:01 pm

Post by notscience »

For the record I didn’t get the reference until votato explained it but as I said in my iso it’s a billion dollar franchise it’s not a surprise some people know it
Show
STRIKE HARD

STRIKE FAST

NO MERCY
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #85 (ISO) » Fri Jun 12, 2020 5:04 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 82, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 73, Green Crayons wrote:Seems within a reasonable band of emotion if she's not lying that she didn't get the reference that apparently
the rest of the player set did
some players badgering her about it did
.
I didn't get the reference
Fixed.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #86 (ISO) » Fri Jun 12, 2020 5:05 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 81, Dunnstral wrote:I don't like the way you went about the early game, votato + hk50, and then the notscience vote
Is this a chronological description of Mala's play?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
notscience
notscience
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
notscience
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 22322
Joined: March 25, 2013
Location: Cobra Kai

Post Post #87 (ISO) » Fri Jun 12, 2020 5:10 pm

Post by notscience »

GC for my curiosity how much have you played recently
Show
STRIKE HARD

STRIKE FAST

NO MERCY
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #88 (ISO) » Fri Jun 12, 2020 5:14 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

One game.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Ghost Ganster
Ghost Ganster
Townie
User avatar
User avatar
Ghost Ganster
Townie
Townie
Posts: 17
Joined: May 31, 2020

Post Post #89 (ISO) » Fri Jun 12, 2020 7:22 pm

Post by Ghost Ganster »

In post 57, Not_Mafia wrote:Wtf is a ganster?
A typo for Gangster. :facepalm:

I like Green Crayons for now.

Suspecting a connection because of shared out-of-game knowledge seems silly to me.
Suspecting people for misreading an interaction based on shared out-of-game knowledge because of a lack of said out-of-game knowledge seems even sillier.

So posts #60 and #61, mainly. They also contain a mixture of obtuse/stubborn/defensive qualities that I don't like, especially with #63 and #64 added on top.
In post 58, Malakittens wrote:
In post 49, Ghost Ganster wrote: UNVOTE: Notty
Is Notty Not_Mafia or notscience?
User avatar
Malakittens
Malakittens
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Malakittens
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 17270
Joined: June 5, 2012

Post Post #90 (ISO) » Fri Jun 12, 2020 10:21 pm

Post by Malakittens »

In post 65, notscience wrote:I’m not voting you yet mala but I’m worried my fears are true :(
No, I’m town I’m just having a rocky start.
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.


Get to know a Mala~Grey<3 4.7.2015
User avatar
Malakittens
Malakittens
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Malakittens
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 17270
Joined: June 5, 2012

Post Post #91 (ISO) » Fri Jun 12, 2020 10:22 pm

Post by Malakittens »

In post 68, Green Crayons wrote:also obviously mala's suspicion of votato is bad, and her back-burner nonsense is silly, but lol nonetheless at farside and notscience
It’s okay. I have heard worse and insulting thing and that’s not the first thing that came to mind.
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.


Get to know a Mala~Grey<3 4.7.2015
User avatar
Malakittens
Malakittens
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Malakittens
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 17270
Joined: June 5, 2012

Post Post #92 (ISO) » Fri Jun 12, 2020 10:25 pm

Post by Malakittens »

In post 81, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 62, Malakittens wrote:
In post 59, Dunnstral wrote:VOTE: Malakittens

You are mafia
Por que?
I don't like the way you went about the early game, votato + hk50, and then the notscience vote
You mean my first post out of the gate? I’m sorry that on gut reaction that I read it as partners also. As for the Notty vote he knew it was coming because we used to be the bestest of friends. I’m not gonna apologize for my RVS, sorry not sorry.
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.


Get to know a Mala~Grey<3 4.7.2015
User avatar
Malakittens
Malakittens
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Malakittens
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 17270
Joined: June 5, 2012

Post Post #93 (ISO) » Fri Jun 12, 2020 10:27 pm

Post by Malakittens »

For the record anything related to not science I’ll prob end up calling him Notty. That is his nickname to me. ~
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.


Get to know a Mala~Grey<3 4.7.2015
User avatar
Dunnstral
Dunnstral
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Dunnstral
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 37035
Joined: April 2, 2016

Post Post #94 (ISO) » Fri Jun 12, 2020 10:39 pm

Post by Dunnstral »

I don't want you to apologize, I want you to die
User avatar
Dunnstral
Dunnstral
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Dunnstral
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 37035
Joined: April 2, 2016

Post Post #95 (ISO) » Fri Jun 12, 2020 10:41 pm

Post by Dunnstral »

In post 86, Green Crayons wrote:
In post 81, Dunnstral wrote:I don't like the way you went about the early game, votato + hk50, and then the notscience vote
Is this a chronological description of Mala's play?
I'm pointing to what I didn't like.
User avatar
Malakittens
Malakittens
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Malakittens
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 17270
Joined: June 5, 2012

Post Post #96 (ISO) » Fri Jun 12, 2020 10:43 pm

Post by Malakittens »

In post 94, Dunnstral wrote:I don't want you to apologize, I want you to die
That’s not happening, but you can dream.
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.


Get to know a Mala~Grey<3 4.7.2015
User avatar
DoctorPepper
DoctorPepper
Coca-Cola
User avatar
User avatar
DoctorPepper
Coca-Cola
Coca-Cola
Posts: 4746
Joined: March 7, 2013
Location: In an office chair "working"

Post Post #97 (ISO) » Fri Jun 12, 2020 11:10 pm

Post by DoctorPepper »

I think Mala isn't scum for not knowing a video game reference from Star Wars. Hell I am a fan and I didn't get it

I think Mala's 90 is a good post. Idk I would think scum would be quite brash and adamant in their posting so I think Mala is town for admitting to the rocky start

I am not liking painting her as scum for this interaction. Not a fan of the votes on her and the person leading it

VOTE: Dunnstral
Show
Keep calm and Drink Dr Pepper :)

Quarantine is driving me crazy :(

Get to know a Pepper!!!
User avatar
DoctorPepper
DoctorPepper
Coca-Cola
User avatar
User avatar
DoctorPepper
Coca-Cola
Coca-Cola
Posts: 4746
Joined: March 7, 2013
Location: In an office chair "working"

Post Post #98 (ISO) » Fri Jun 12, 2020 11:11 pm

Post by DoctorPepper »

In post 70, notscience wrote:I don’t think she’s scummy for that I don’t like her 64 but I’m still reacquainting myself

I also just realized I told her I’m not voting her yet but my rvs is still on her and feel dumb
Ns, this feels so noncommittal and I'm not a fan right now
Show
Keep calm and Drink Dr Pepper :)

Quarantine is driving me crazy :(

Get to know a Pepper!!!
User avatar
DoctorPepper
DoctorPepper
Coca-Cola
User avatar
User avatar
DoctorPepper
Coca-Cola
Coca-Cola
Posts: 4746
Joined: March 7, 2013
Location: In an office chair "working"

Post Post #99 (ISO) » Fri Jun 12, 2020 11:12 pm

Post by DoctorPepper »

I could go Dunn or farside for the Mala push rn tbh
Show
Keep calm and Drink Dr Pepper :)

Quarantine is driving me crazy :(

Get to know a Pepper!!!
Locked