Day 1 has begun and will end in (expired on 2020-06-22 07:23:04).
Battle Mage is V/LA until Sunday.[/area]
Which to me reads that, well he agrees that everything mala said looks bad or silly but it's scummy to point that out. Then he says this:In post 68, Green Crayons wrote:also obviously mala's suspicion of votato is bad, and her back-burner nonsense is silly, but lol nonetheless at farside and notscience
Again that was in my post that he disagreed with. So none of his disagreement match with what he is saying after.In post 69, Green Crayons wrote:So that reads a lot more asshole than I intended.In post 68, Green Crayons wrote:her back-burner nonsense is silly
But. Like. Anyone who has played videogames and likes Star Wars knows the reference. There's nothing to back burner.
You’re a towelIn post 98, DoctorPepper wrote:Ns, this feels so noncommittal and I'm not a fan right nowIn post 70, notscience wrote:I don’t think she’s scummy for that I don’t like her 64 but I’m still reacquainting myself
I also just realized I told her I’m not voting her yet but my rvs is still on her and feel dumb
You’re still voting her.In post 102, notscience wrote:I didn’t think wagoning mala would be fruitful at this point in time and wanted to let it develop
Hate to say it, but that’s not par from the course for Notty.In post 105, Green Crayons wrote:You’re still voting her.In post 102, notscience wrote:I didn’t think wagoning mala would be fruitful at this point in time and wanted to let it develop
so very very useful?In post 102, notscience wrote:You’re a towel
I have higher expectation for Mala.In post 104, Green Crayons wrote:Town have bad suspicions all the time.
That's cool. Man the guide lines and the social standards are going to be a pain in the ass for a few months. I haven't even been called to come back to work and my place has been open a month now. They had some people come back so far, but not all.In post 114, notscience wrote:@n_m
You’re a towel
@gc
I’m a manager- new company I joined a month ago and I’ve never opened a location before
That she has a bad reason for suspecting votato/HK can go either way in terms of Mala’s alignment.In post 115, farside22 wrote:I have higher expectation for Mala.
I find this more interesting. Let’s talk about it.In post 101, farside22 wrote:Also funny enough I now have a scum ping on Dunn
Yeah, I'm glad there are a few people here I've played with so my day1ness wont be too much of a problemIn post 109, Malakittens wrote:You know I’m glad I played a game with you before because that comment is just eh.
Post 94 is a bit extreme this early in the game to say. Plus i found it interesting dunn is saying the same thing as me.In post 118, Green Crayons wrote:Anyway.
I find this more interesting. Let’s talk about it.In post 101, farside22 wrote:Also funny enough I now have a scum ping on Dunn
I think she said she sees it was in regards to a video game but still finds them suspect as possible team is more then a bit ridiculousGreen Crayons wrote:That she has a bad reason for suspecting votato/HK can go either way in terms of Mala’s alignment.In post 115, farside22 wrote:I have higher expectation for Mala.
The fact that her suspicion is bad is because she isn’t familiar with SW video games means her bad suspicion isn’t alignment indicative.
You “expecting more” of Malta here means you “expected Mala to get the SW reference so she wouldn’t have had the bad suspicion.”
Unless if you think she’s lying about missing the SW reference.
So how strong was your read on mala at that point. As it feels more to me like someone poking a small bump in the lawn. Than a suspected ants nest. ( i know i'm bad at analogies )In post 101, farside22 wrote:See the thing that I found odd is 2 things
1) In regards to mala is that she said she thought them scum together and wanted to keep that on the back burner even when it was just a reference to a video game. So that just made no sense this early in the game.
2) was this post from GC:Which to me reads that, well he agrees that everything mala said looks bad or silly but it's scummy to point that out. Then he says this:In post 68, Green Crayons wrote:also obviously mala's suspicion of votato is bad, and her back-burner nonsense is silly, but lol nonetheless at farside and notscienceAgain that was in my post that he disagreed with. So none of his disagreement match with what he is saying after.In post 69, Green Crayons wrote:So that reads a lot more asshole than I intended.In post 68, Green Crayons wrote:her back-burner nonsense is silly
But. Like. Anyone who has played videogames and likes Star Wars knows the reference. There's nothing to back burner.
VOTE: Green Crayon
Also funny enough I now have a scum ping on Dunn
In post 119, geraintm wrote:Yeah, I'm glad there are a few people here I've played with so my day1ness wont be too much of a problemIn post 109, Malakittens wrote:You know I’m glad I played a game with you before because that comment is just eh.