NS and HK are pumping town vibes.In post 160, Battle Mage wrote:I'm bored and people love ambitious plays on Day 1, so I'm gonna go with:
Green Crayons, Malakittens, Notscience and HK50 for scum.
Mala is null.
I'm obviously town.
What a bad list.
NS and HK are pumping town vibes.In post 160, Battle Mage wrote:I'm bored and people love ambitious plays on Day 1, so I'm gonna go with:
Green Crayons, Malakittens, Notscience and HK50 for scum.
Damn robot needs re-programming again.In post 166, HK 50 wrote:In post 143, Battle Mage wrote:I'll catch up later, but for now:
VOTE: HK 50 - biggest wagon and he appears to have a horrible post restriction and needs to be put out of his misery.[Definition:]Efficiency: the ratio of the useful work performed by a machine or in a process to the total energy expended or heat taken in.
Known antonyms: Master Battle Mage
Excellent, I thought you'd never ask!In post 168, HK 50 wrote:[Statement:]The lack of actual discussion is making my circuits moderately irritated. There cannot be ruthless slaughter like this.
VOTE: Dunnstral
Master Battle Mage feel free to explain the basis of your read.
Yeah I can dig that, I'm a strange cat too, just having fun!In post 170, Malakittens wrote:I’m trying to figure where your head is at with self voting and the woe is me with the other posts. IDK the last set of posts are just coming off strange.In post 162, Battle Mage wrote:OMGUS Malakittens? what is your reaction to my posts?
The whole “I’m going to do a guess” doesn’t really strike me as a real case/vote.
Then why don’t you vote me and actually get a case? I’m not scared.
BattleIn post 172, Malakittens wrote:Right now I’m liking bob’s posts. The way he’s going about is very similar to the last game we played together. I’m starting to see you scum hunting while you’re using your gimmick. A lot of players that use gimmicks hide behind it and don’t actually scum hunt. So that give me town pings.In post 165, HK 50 wrote:In post 138, Malakittens wrote:Hm. I really did just like HK 137. But I want to see how that progressesIn post 144, Malakittens wrote:That post has a bad gut feeling, but will wait for redemption[Interrogation:Master Malakitten, you have made several posts showing a stance without explaining it nor fully committing to it. Please explain your pings. Has the interaction with master bob3141 reached a finite conclusion read wise considering you town ping both of us?
Where as Battle Mange is the post I was referring to that felt a scum ping IMO. That’s way before he even thought I was OMGUSing him.
In post 178, Not_Mafia wrote:Battle Mage is today's lynch btw everyone
Well I might be today's lynch, but I'm not scum dude! You selling anything else?In post 185, Not_Mafia wrote:Battle Mage is definitely scum
This looks serious...what's the story here?
I completely agree with this, his posts are pretty unreadable for me too because of the format. But I also think it's a very conspicuous posting style and a lot of effort for scum to keep up with minimal value, so slight townlean. Like, if scum, why bother?In post 191, stungun0404 wrote:I am currently a few pages into reading, but would like to make a request. @HK50, I love your posting style -- so nothing against it -- but could you possibly use less sophisticated words to get your points across? I can understand what you are saying if I really spend time looking into your every post, but it is very hard to read some of your posts on the surface.
Another reason I ask this is because using a ton of more complicated words makes it more difficult than normal to read your intentions. This posting style could be extremely effective for scum to hide behind, because it is an easy way for them to blanket their intentions, because a lot more effort is needed than typical to truly assess their motives.
And if you are town, then it should make sense why this could become an issue. Because if people are having to spend too much time looking at a townplayer's posts to unpack their motives, it takes away from their focus of scumhunting, which absolutely could lead us down the wrong path in the long run.
excellent, glad to see exchange rates won't be a problem! Please do let me know if you have any other reads or observations at any stage...In post 190, Not_Mafia wrote:£3.74 for a cheesecake
lolIn post 184, Battle Mage wrote:he hadn't indicated suspicion of ANYONE. His only vote was a random vote on Farside - I know it was random because he made it very clear by saying "eenie meanie minie mo".
I point you to:
In post 196, Green Crayons wrote:lolIn post 184, Battle Mage wrote:he hadn't indicated suspicion of ANYONE. His only vote was a random vote on Farside - I know it was random because he made it very clear by saying "eenie meanie minie mo".
I can understand why you might gather a townlean from it, but at least for me I cannot say that it gives me any direction on his alignment. If someone reads a lot, using more difficult words can come naturally to them. In fact, I have played a game where I used a lot more sophisticated words than usual as mafia before, so knowing that I have done it as scum and it took very little effort for me means that I must be cautious if I see someone else doing it.In post 193, Battle Mage wrote:I completely agree with this, his posts are pretty unreadable for me too because of the format. But I also think it's a very conspicuous posting style and a lot of effort for scum to keep up with minimal value, so slight townlean. Like, if scum, why bother?In post 191, stungun0404 wrote:I am currently a few pages into reading, but would like to make a request. @HK50, I love your posting style -- so nothing against it -- but could you possibly use less sophisticated words to get your points across? I can understand what you are saying if I really spend time looking into your every post, but it is very hard to read some of your posts on the surface.
Another reason I ask this is because using a ton of more complicated words makes it more difficult than normal to read your intentions. This posting style could be extremely effective for scum to hide behind, because it is an easy way for them to blanket their intentions, because a lot more effort is needed than typical to truly assess their motives.
And if you are town, then it should make sense why this could become an issue. Because if people are having to spend too much time looking at a townplayer's posts to unpack their motives, it takes away from their focus of scumhunting, which absolutely could lead us down the wrong path in the long run.