In the first post, I actually don't see how you can scumread someone simply because they're scumreading someone you think as town. That's why I needed clarification on that part. Don't like how you're framing this post as me accusing the accuser of being scum and passively defending them when I'm simply asking for more clarification.In post 217, Hectic wrote:Not a fan. It's another "defend someone and ask the accuser to elaborate" kind of post. They're not hard for scum to make, and I want to see more independent thoughts, turtle.In post 177, piisirrational wrote:Explain? This doesn't make sense. Raya's explanation of why she finds Ghost scummy ("I honestly think Ghost's list of scumreads was setting up mislynches and if any gained traction he would push that one." and how she disagreed with Ghost's suggestion of a policy lynch) is perfectly valid and I don't see any scum motivation here for Raya to push Ghost.In post 166, gibus wrote:To clarify: I'm scumreading you because of your SR, not because you have a lot of nullreads.In post 146, Raya36 wrote:You have a point about null reads but I think that applies much later on the game rather than 6 pages in. A lot of null reads this early is normal. A lot of scumreads this early doesn't sit well with me.
Hmm, following the trend here. I don't get why you think town!Elmo can only be doing this as reaction tests. Why can't it just be playstyle? This is a perfect way for you to look like you're defending town but without an actual valid reason, since scum!you might expect town!Elmo to absolutely not be doing reaction testing, so you don't need to worry about actually derailing the wagon.In post 181, piisirrational wrote:I'm not sold on Elmo being scum. She seems pretty aggressive with how she's voting people, but I don't think scum are usually this aggressive in their play. However, the only thing I can attribute to her continual movement of votes and reactions as town is as some form of reaction test (can't really explain much beyond this because this just feels like a possibility in this context). Reaction tests aren't useful though unless information is gained from them so I'd like Elmo to explain the motivation behind her movement of votes at some point.
I stated that I find it that town!Elmo would be making posts 94 and 97 for a reaction test. How likely do I think it is for another reason? Not likely. It's still possible, which is why I want Elmo to clarify the reasoning/motivation behind those posts despite me giving her a slight townlean. Also, I don't like how you're saying how I would be worried about derailing a town wagon. I stated why I don't think Elmo is scum; not jumping on the wagon because of that is NAI.
Don't like your responses to either of my posts.
VOTE: Hectic