Mini Normal 2148 (Post Game)

Normal Games (With basic roles and standard mechanics) Signups Here
Forum rules
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #575 (ISO) » Thu Jun 18, 2020 1:24 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 573, Battle Mage wrote:A. That wasn't the only reason for my vote - just one that GC has tried to strawman and attack me for.
Also this is a lie.

You didn’t give any other reason for your votato vote.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #576 (ISO) » Thu Jun 18, 2020 1:28 am

Post by Green Crayons »

Anyway. I’ll give BM some more thought.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Dunnstral
Dunnstral
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Dunnstral
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 37035
Joined: April 2, 2016

Post Post #577 (ISO) » Thu Jun 18, 2020 1:29 am

Post by Dunnstral »

He looks like town to me
User avatar
Dunnstral
Dunnstral
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Dunnstral
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 37035
Joined: April 2, 2016

Post Post #578 (ISO) » Thu Jun 18, 2020 1:32 am

Post by Dunnstral »

In post 155, Not_Mafia wrote:VOTE: Battle Mage
In post 178, Not_Mafia wrote:Battle Mage is today's lynch btw everyone
In post 185, Not_Mafia wrote:Battle Mage is definitely scum
In post 195, Not_Mafia wrote:Battle Mage must die
In post 270, Not_Mafia wrote:Battle Mage/Dunnstral/?
In post 363, Not_Mafia wrote:BM is still scum guys
In post 509, Not_Mafia wrote:It's possible I guess, but votato or Battle Mage is today's lynch
In post 564, Not_Mafia wrote:
In post 555, votato wrote:yeah at this point im fine with a GC or BM lynch.
Cool, join me on BM then
In post 566, Not_Mafia wrote:Scum fleeing the scene of the crime ^
VOTE: Not_Mafia
User avatar
Not_Mafia
Not_Mafia
Smash Hit
User avatar
User avatar
Not_Mafia
Smash Hit
Smash Hit
Posts: 22714
Joined: February 5, 2014
Location: Whitney's Gym

Post Post #579 (ISO) » Thu Jun 18, 2020 1:33 am

Post by Not_Mafia »

Mage/votato/Dunn
Also, what is Not_Mafia doing? This is some of the worst play I’ve ever seen.
I will SEARCH for games with you and N_M to help you policy him.
I can't remember the last N_M post that wasn't bland, unimaginative and lame. Some shitposters are at least somewhat funny. You are the epitomy of the type of poster that nobody would miss if you were to suddenly disappear. You never add anything of value.
User avatar
stungun0404
stungun0404
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
stungun0404
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2292
Joined: May 25, 2018

Post Post #580 (ISO) » Thu Jun 18, 2020 1:38 am

Post by stungun0404 »

I find it weird that geraintm and dunn are suddenly coming out of the woodwork sticking up for BM, and dunn has already stuck up against geraintm being lynched, and geraintm weakly against dunn? Anyone else find this strange?
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #581 (ISO) » Thu Jun 18, 2020 1:48 am

Post by Green Crayons »

I'd find it strange if BM flips scum.

Let's flip BM.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #582 (ISO) » Thu Jun 18, 2020 1:49 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 576, Green Crayons wrote:Anyway. I’ll give BM some more thought.
I do plan on doing this, which really should be a reread to make sure my sense of things isn't completely off.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #583 (ISO) » Thu Jun 18, 2020 1:49 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 580, stungun0404 wrote:dunn has already stuck up against geraintm being lynched, and geraintm weakly against dunn
Can you pull what you're referencing here?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
stungun0404
stungun0404
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
stungun0404
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2292
Joined: May 25, 2018

Post Post #584 (ISO) » Thu Jun 18, 2020 2:06 am

Post by stungun0404 »

In post 492, geraintm wrote:thought I would lok over Dunnstral, as they are currently the biggest wagon.

they are throwing arounda bunch of "they are mafia" posts very easily.
they have a few posts where they say they think someone is town.

they seem a bit trigger happy with their calling people scum, but overall...nothing here I am too upset about yet.
In post 583, Green Crayons wrote:
In post 580, stungun0404 wrote:dunn has already stuck up against geraintm being lynched, and geraintm weakly against dunn
Can you pull what you're referencing here?
In post 444, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 442, stungun0404 wrote:Where do you think geraintm fits in, if you had to guess?
I don't know, I wouldn't lynch himr ight now
In post 492, geraintm wrote:thought I would lok over Dunnstral, as they are currently the biggest wagon.

they are throwing arounda bunch of "they are mafia" posts very easily.
they have a few posts where they say they think someone is town.

they seem a bit trigger happy with their calling people scum, but overall...nothing here I am too upset about yet.
User avatar
stungun0404
stungun0404
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
stungun0404
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2292
Joined: May 25, 2018

Post Post #585 (ISO) » Thu Jun 18, 2020 2:26 am

Post by stungun0404 »

VOTE: BM

I am starting to get a sense that he is the true scum between him/GC; the lack of proactivity/genuine scumhunting from him is pretty damning.
User avatar
votato
votato
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
votato
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4028
Joined: April 17, 2020

Post Post #586 (ISO) » Thu Jun 18, 2020 2:52 am

Post by votato »

Gc why do you want to flip bm if you think he'll flip town?
"It is not our ignorance that will kill us, but our arrogance"
"I expect that 90% of what you say to me is one form of trickery or another" - a friend irl
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #587 (ISO) » Thu Jun 18, 2020 2:55 am

Post by Green Crayons »

I don't?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #588 (ISO) » Thu Jun 18, 2020 3:02 am

Post by Green Crayons »

I think BM is more likely to flip scum than town. His explanation for reading scum's NAI meta analysis as AI is plausible on its face. In context though, that plausibility doesn't undermine the other suspicions that point to scum:

-He took forever to provide his AI justification, although he supposedly thought of it ages ago

- He took plenty of time to discredit my suspicions as strawmanning without actually just engaging with my suspicions and providing his AI justification, suggesting delay to come up with a plausible reason after the fact

- He's saying BOTH (1) he had other suspicions for voting votato so we shouldn't suspect him for this thin reasoning (supposed other reasons that he never voiced, so how are we supposed to know that?) AND (2) it was an early vote so we're expecting too much from him in terms of reasoning, which are contradictory defenses that defeat each other. EITHER we should give him a pass because he had other, stronger reasons to vote votato OR we should give him a pass because it was early D1 so he didn't need to have strong reasons to vote votato. It looks like scum slinging whatever defenses he can.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #589 (ISO) » Thu Jun 18, 2020 3:03 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 588, Green Crayons wrote:His explanation for reading
scum's
stun's
NAI meta analysis as AI is plausible on its face.
Fixed.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
votato
votato
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
votato
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4028
Joined: April 17, 2020

Post Post #590 (ISO) » Thu Jun 18, 2020 3:24 am

Post by votato »

In post 581, Green Crayons wrote:I'd find it strange if BM flips scum.

Let's flip BM.
"It is not our ignorance that will kill us, but our arrogance"
"I expect that 90% of what you say to me is one form of trickery or another" - a friend irl
User avatar
geraintm
geraintm
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
geraintm
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4587
Joined: March 9, 2006
Location: Wales

Post Post #591 (ISO) » Thu Jun 18, 2020 3:24 am

Post by geraintm »

In post 571, Green Crayons wrote:You have my name wrong.

that is true. Sorry.
I hope we are keeping score as I reckon I am going to win this game when we are all done and dusted :)
User avatar
stungun0404
stungun0404
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
stungun0404
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2292
Joined: May 25, 2018

Post Post #592 (ISO) » Thu Jun 18, 2020 3:28 am

Post by stungun0404 »

So far, I feel good in asserting these players as more likely town than not: Not Science, farside, Dr. Pepper, Mala
Gut is also leaning town with Bob.

That means I think in all likelihood all scum have to be in this group of 7 players {NM, geraintm, GC, HK, Dunnstral, votato, BM}
User avatar
geraintm
geraintm
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
geraintm
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4587
Joined: March 9, 2006
Location: Wales

Post Post #593 (ISO) » Thu Jun 18, 2020 3:32 am

Post by geraintm »

In post 580, stungun0404 wrote:I find it weird that geraintm and dunn are suddenly coming out of the woodwork sticking up for BM, and dunn has already stuck up against geraintm being lynched, and geraintm weakly against dunn? Anyone else find this strange?
I didn't feel like I was coming out of the woodwork. I was only commenting on something I found odd. it wasn't sticking up for battle mage, instead on the attack coming from the other way
User avatar
DoctorPepper
DoctorPepper
Coca-Cola
User avatar
User avatar
DoctorPepper
Coca-Cola
Coca-Cola
Posts: 4746
Joined: March 7, 2013
Location: In an office chair "working"

Post Post #594 (ISO) » Thu Jun 18, 2020 3:33 am

Post by DoctorPepper »

My scum read vouching against the biggest wagon and voting for NM instead without supplying much info does not sit well with me tbh
Show
Keep calm and Drink Dr Pepper :)

Quarantine is driving me crazy :(

Get to know a Pepper!!!
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #595 (ISO) » Thu Jun 18, 2020 3:38 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 580, stungun0404 wrote:
I find it weird that geraintm and dunn
are suddenly coming out of the woodwork sticking up for BM, and dunn has already stuck up against geraintm being lynched, and geraintm weakly against dunn? Anyone else find this strange?
In post 590, votato wrote:
In post 581, Green Crayons wrote:I'd find it strange if BM flips scum.

Let's flip BM.
I was saying I would find it strange in response to stun, with the "it" referring to gerain's and dunn's actions as noted by stun.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
stungun0404
stungun0404
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
stungun0404
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2292
Joined: May 25, 2018

Post Post #596 (ISO) » Thu Jun 18, 2020 3:41 am

Post by stungun0404 »

In post 594, DoctorPepper wrote:My scum read vouching against the biggest wagon and voting for NM instead without supplying much info does not sit well with me tbh
He's not pushing a counterwagon likely to gain traction though? What do you make of that?
User avatar
DoctorPepper
DoctorPepper
Coca-Cola
User avatar
User avatar
DoctorPepper
Coca-Cola
Coca-Cola
Posts: 4746
Joined: March 7, 2013
Location: In an office chair "working"

Post Post #597 (ISO) » Thu Jun 18, 2020 4:02 am

Post by DoctorPepper »

Could be trying to deflect it also so as it doesn't look like a counterwagon
Show
Keep calm and Drink Dr Pepper :)

Quarantine is driving me crazy :(

Get to know a Pepper!!!
User avatar
Not_Mafia
Not_Mafia
Smash Hit
User avatar
User avatar
Not_Mafia
Smash Hit
Smash Hit
Posts: 22714
Joined: February 5, 2014
Location: Whitney's Gym

Post Post #598 (ISO) » Thu Jun 18, 2020 4:47 am

Post by Not_Mafia »

ZZZZzzzz just lynch the BM slot to save the mod a job ZZZZzzZZZzzz
Also, what is Not_Mafia doing? This is some of the worst play I’ve ever seen.
I will SEARCH for games with you and N_M to help you policy him.
I can't remember the last N_M post that wasn't bland, unimaginative and lame. Some shitposters are at least somewhat funny. You are the epitomy of the type of poster that nobody would miss if you were to suddenly disappear. You never add anything of value.
User avatar
HK 50
HK 50
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
HK 50
Goon
Goon
Posts: 113
Joined: June 6, 2020
Location: Fictitious response: Inside a Hutt

Post Post #599 (ISO) » Thu Jun 18, 2020 5:48 am

Post by HK 50 »

Ok I'm tired of roleplaying and in general, so let's just skip the formalities and get to the murdering of scum MKAY? Since there hasn't been a murder yet, it seems you need some guidance MKAY? And I'm not talking about spiritual means, though some of you sicks fucks need that too MKAY?

MKAYYYYYY?!

(I'm also lazy so it's easier to post and click on my ISO link this way. Do not judge me you nepotistic swine)
Locked