In post 421, Looker wrote:Is this sarcasm? Everything here is written down...forever...why would you need to be reminded of something...? The intent is to sort.
![Yawn :yawn:](./images/smilies/icon_yawn.gif)
In post 421, Looker wrote:Is this sarcasm? Everything here is written down...forever...why would you need to be reminded of something...? The intent is to sort.
Idk if I'm comfortable with going to bed leaving someone at L-2 this early in a dayIn post 424, popopopopopopo wrote:Ok senpaiIn post 342, NorwegianboyEE wrote:@Popopo
Scum has been caught. Vote GuiltyLion with me or you will be scum claiming. K tnx.
vote: guiltylion
This post oofIn post 357, GuiltyLion wrote:Norway is trying reeeaaaaalll hard to actsuperconfident that he caught me
do you have any readsIn post 421, Looker wrote:I think I'm accustomed to Saudade claiming mason every game, so I think I could care less. I was trying to offset my bias with your opinion.In post 176, LicketyQuickety wrote:I don't think there is a rule that you can't claim within 7 pages...In post 144, Looker wrote:Do you feel we have a legitimate claim 7 pages in?
What do YOU think about the claim? Do you believe they are millar?In post 183, LicketyQuickety wrote:I kinda don't like this post.In post 144, Looker wrote:...
-Apathy
-laziness
-voting for no reason
Don't like anything about this post actually.
- I don't see how it's apathy when I'm asking you questions. Apathy would be ignoring you entirely.
- Lazy is a strong accusation to make. Lazy compared to who and using what metrics?
- I definitely have a reason for voting you. Is your accusation your way of asking for it?
Voting you will help me sort you, Glitch, and osuka all at the same time.To sort more players than QuickIn post 206, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:Looker, why did you vote for Quick?That's any game where the players are insecure. Don't let that poison you.In post 221, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:lol this game is going to be a clash of egos huhSimple - a mason claim is self-resolving: Truth should die tonight or get lynched tomorrow. I'm not fond of people hijacking my attention as a form of distraction. There are still 11 other people that I have to go through.In post 299, Glitch wrote:Why with all this to go on would we still be in RVS?Would you prefer an overexaggeration of word vomit that no one's going to read? Please challenge my thoughts: With what that I've presented do you disagree? Are you accusing me of playing it safe with my first two posts of the game...? Your expectations are unclear.In post 299, Glitch wrote:I'm just gonna say Looker really bugs me with the very little contribution he has. There's nothing good he contributed here.Is this sarcasm? Everything here is written down...forever...why would you need to be reminded of something...? The intent is to sort.In post 420, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Glitch and Looker, remind me why you two are voting Quick?
I should have more time to post this weekend; sorry I've been so busy.
In post 357, GuiltyLion wrote:Norway is trying reeeaaaaalll hard to actsuperconfident that he caught me
So is he trying really hard to seem confident or is he hedging? You criticize norwe for doing one thing and then you come at him for doing the opposite too.In post 374, GuiltyLion wrote:Finally, if you were truly confident that you caught me, you wouldn't feel compelled to hedge like you did in the last sentence. "IF GL flips scum, I'm gonna celebrate" like ok bud, you know I'm not flipping scum. If you were town and thought you caught scum and were proud of it, you'd be bragging already and asking others to join you, not awkwardly trying to pretend like you're already proud yet still introducing uncertain tone into it and suddenly switching to future-thinking ("I'm going to celebrate" vs being in the process of actively celebrating).
ouch, I’m hurtIn post 389, Nauci wrote:I 100% believe that scum put on this type of show sometimes but I 0% believe that either Quick or Osuka could do thatIn post 293, Truth wrote:Could they not be performing an act of WIFOM? Where they intentionally push each other with reasons that seem legitimate, but it's because they know people will think they are town for doing them.
I posted the first thought to pressure him further cause all he had given at that point was "this is classic scum GL omegalul" and hadn't bothered to respond to the actual substance I had put into the thread. That was not an invitation for him to then go on a Crusade to Spin Literally Everything I Ever Post as scummyIn post 404, Nauci wrote:Hol upIn post 359, GuiltyLion wrote:for somebody who "doesn't feel pressure" you sure felt the need to ramp up your activity and argue with every pointIn post 344, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I don't feel pressure from a case on me that's as bad as GuiltyLion's.In post 322, Truth wrote:I like GuiltyLion's case and may follow him for a while. Let's vote the person so he feels more pressure when he comes back and then has to respond while being a little self-conscious.
Didn't you shade him for not addressing your accusations point by point when he flat out called it bs?
Are you now shading him for then going and doing that?
Say what now
my dude, when you posted this it was 1 am and I had gone to bed. See also this post where I said, 5 hours earlier, that I would be around for the next 3-4 hours:In post 408, NorwegianboyEE wrote:GuiltyLying also left without answering my question which i helpfully reminded him to do.
Scum claiming.
I also frankly am not going to answer the question, because it's loud and clear that your intent is just to argue with me and paint me as looking bad rather than actually get useful info from it. If you don't think Nauci and CSF are town, tell the thread what you think they've done that's scummy, and we can hash it out. If you think they're town then you shouldn't care why I think they're town, either I'm scum and they're me TMIing real townies, or I'm town and we agree on townreads. Either way there's no point in talking about it except to try to further shade me, which I'm not all that interested in.In post 304, GuiltyLion wrote:I'll be around for the next 3-4 hours so hmu and let's jam, especially the cats cause I want CSF to townread me
If Norway is town then popopopopopopopopopopopopopopopopop is likely scum, especially given the hop on me which I'll get toIn post 411, Nauci wrote:I just found it odd that popopopopo immediately accepted the voting alliance without questioning, and that this in turn was accepted without questioning. It felt alignment indicative to me but I couldn't fathom in which direction without doing some heavy meta lifting
my dudeIn post 416, NorwegianboyEE wrote:It's also bloody hilarious that he calls me out as "tunneling" when that's basically what he's been doing himself. Town!GL is usually much more subtle and takes a look at the whole game, he doesn't double down on a shitpush.
Is this really what you want your legacy to be when I flip green? Why doesn't town!GL make that post?In post 427, popopopopopopo wrote:This post oofIn post 357, GuiltyLion wrote:Norway is trying reeeaaaaalll hard to actsuperconfident that he caught me
This is caught scum posting
This is a pretty bad post here popopoppopopopop. I think it should be clear what I was saying: Norway wasIn post 429, popopopopopopo wrote:In post 357, GuiltyLion wrote:Norway is trying reeeaaaaalll hard to actsuperconfident that he caught meSo is he trying really hard to seem confident or is he hedging? You criticize norwe for doing one thing and then you come at him for doing the opposite too.In post 374, GuiltyLion wrote:Finally, if you were truly confident that you caught me, you wouldn't feel compelled to hedge like you did in the last sentence. "IF GL flips scum, I'm gonna celebrate" like ok bud, you know I'm not flipping scum. If you were town and thought you caught scum and were proud of it, you'd be bragging already and asking others to join you, not awkwardly trying to pretend like you're already proud yet still introducing uncertain tone into it and suddenly switching to future-thinking ("I'm going to celebrate" vs being in the process of actively celebrating).
we also played another newbie where you replaced in and you scumread me and never finished reading D1 where I caught scumIn post 411, Nauci wrote:I have only played 1 game with GL and it was a newbie he replaced into like 2 years ago so I can't even remember his alignment
do you really see nothing suspicious at all with popopoppoppo this game, or how he casually hopped onto me?In post 444, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Now GL is trying to spin things in an entirely different direction, this is known as misdirection.
I don't, because i think there have been plenty good reasons to vote you.In post 446, GuiltyLion wrote:do you really see nothing suspicious at all with popopoppoppo this game, or how he casually hopped onto me?
Well that should be obvious it will make me look bad. However, i think your play has been way scummier than him so far.In post 446, GuiltyLion wrote:assume I'm town for a second, how does that look to you?
uh, what? Can we revisit these again:In post 447, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I don't, because i think there have been plenty good reasons to vote you.
further, I don't care how it makes you look, I care whether you think popopopoppoppoppo might be scum sheeping you onto the leading wagon. I asked you explicitly to assume that I'm town so you can try to walk through his ISO and possibly work with me and show me what you see. Your response suggests you're seemingly incapable of even assuming I'm town for a hypothetical, that's a really dangerous and bad way to play the team game.In post 447, NorwegianboyEE wrote:ell that should be obvious it will make me look bad.