Does he typically have to take a leading role in dragging town with him?In post 684, farside22 wrote:I was going to say something till I saw your list. Did you check GC's meta that was referenced?
I thought reading GC that he was getting mad about his push and it was reading like he was offended that he even had to explain himself. But after researching his meta and rereading his points on BM I'm feeling differently about GC. He recent games are town so far (I didn't check older games) and he is more laid back and not this bitchy typically. Or this full of himself so I'm now leaning more towards a scum read. Plus I feel like he is being a bit over the top on his read and reaction to BM.
Hi theres this great website called google.com that says thats literally what the type of droid is and weve already covered that votato is clearly a fan of star wars and the game thats being referenced.In post 694, stungun0404 wrote:Instance attempt at a distancing vote? Note the wording: I "know" that you are really an "assassin droid".
How can you "know" that he is an "assassin droid" unless you are, in fact, scum with him?
Didnt we literally spend 10 pages covering how that isnt scummy
You do realize scum arent likely to do the exact same thing and hide themselves in the exact same styles?In post 696, stungun0404 wrote:Also note all three of Votato, BM and GC have weakly sheep-voted people, using players as shields.
In post 702, stungun0404 wrote:Lie. No follow through (which in this case is anti-town).
Im not lynching people based off preflip associatives and them "lying" about when they plan to finish catching up because this is a GAME and people have REAL LIVES to focus on.In post 703, stungun0404 wrote:They have all three lied. Lynch all liars. Lying about simple and clear intentions with no follow-through and lying to implicate me is what can be considered scummy here. Simple as that.
OTOH, Dunn hasnotmade one single blatant lie in this game. You can ISO everything he has said to confirm that there is no blatant lie. That's the difference between town and scum I think in this particular game.
Not that the "lynch all liars" approach always works, but in this case I think it leads us to the correct solve.
DAMN STRAIGHT YOU DOIn post 714, HK 50 wrote:wait I have to be funny
Fuck ass noIn post 717, stungun0404 wrote:@Farside, @Dr. Pepper, @NS, since I trust you are all three town, would you guys be willing to potentially move over and lynch Clidd this day phase provided that I promise you that we lynch either Dunn or Votato next day phase?
IMO only way scums comfy rn is if one of them is leading the apathy wagons.In post 725, farside22 wrote:I feel the bold to be pretty spot on. I think if dunn was town he would have been an easy lynch. His vote on nm is lazy as that is how nm is and he avoids discussing anything relevant.
I abandoned it due to cold feet re my own thoughts on votato not related to the wagon and I daresay Im the reason that wagon fell apart, and why are we doing preflip associatives like this.In post 727, bob3141 wrote:It does feel sort of suspect looking back. Bm makes a scummy vote on vota. The vota wagon gets quickly abandoned and when he is benign suspect he makes a weak push on dun being town. All the while never really trying to explain how he managed to come to the opposite conclusion using one of your points. Until just before he repped out.
Robot 728 is town.
Im town my darling little curling ironIn post 731, HK 50 wrote:-Im sure there are points that help sort conscience, malakitten, and GC.
1) Cases on availability on players not regarded as lurkers of a typical alignment are trashIn post 735, stungun0404 wrote:Is it not scummy to add an extra day to the clock only to use more than double that amount of time up without even saying so much as a word like "I am having trouble catching up" or something? I can understand busyness, but at the same time it only takes about 15-30 seconds to come in and say something like that, and it also helps us.
Do you think for a second that might be scum that has no defense for what I called them out about on Friday?
Votato has also not answered. It has been >36 hours since I asked those questions, and HK only responded after I asked him a second time. Do you think there is a reason these players are dodging those questions?
2) Don't you think scum that had a defense for it would have posted it super quick instead of, as you say, avoiding it?
3) Why do they even need to answer a case that literally boils down to their interactions with someone else that they might not necessarily be on a team with? "YOU HAVE TO BE SCUM FOR DOING THIS WITH THAT SCUM" doesnt really work. Besides, you aren't going to convince those players they are scum. They either know they are or know they arent you cant convince someone of that shit cases are purely to try to convince the rest of the game to follow you.
4) Why do I have to explain these base concepts that you are using to force an apathy lynch?
Yes my beloved flashlight.In post 741, HK 50 wrote:Read mine and stunguns when you get a chance and tell me what you think and why.
I think its just really misguided town. I fully agree with the points you are bringing up, but we don’t really have a solid other option presently.
THANK YOUIn post 751, Green Crayons wrote:There is a metric ton of associative theory going on without a flip.
Yes its the same thing that made me suspect dolly originally and given the gamestate it does kind of make sense. Im back and forth on him because it did feel like he was TvT with GC earlier. But idk.In post 756, votato wrote:honestly im a bit suspicious of stun for how hard he's spamming the thread pushing inactives, but i think he just got caught up in the excitement of seeing several events happening and unconsciously tying them together. i think it would be a terrible play for the scumteam to ask for more time and then all go afk at the same time.
I feel like hes trying to inject life into a town similar to how I was last game so its whats holding me off atm, but there has to be a scum thats trying to pull strings.
I dont really feel like NM has done much calling out and moreso that hes just been tunneling regardless of BMs alignmentIn post 759, Green Crayons wrote:Phone posting so, long and short of BM/Clidd is that BM’s wonky posts that NM called out