How is that scummy? Why is that not a valid point?In post 920, notscience wrote:His push where he thought I was townreading all the people I’m used to playing with?
Still waiting for a case from you that magically hasn't happened.
So making a case is pointless?In post 924, votato wrote:im not gonna re-read his entire iso just because you quote it either. if you arent doing any commentary on what you're quoting im gonna scroll past it either way. its easier to do if you spoilerize it though.In post 919, farside22 wrote:In post 916, votato wrote:the words you used. there were some typos and i just couldnt follow your logic at all. also could people use spoilers if theyre gonna quote the entire thread?In post 913, farside22 wrote:What are you confused about?In post 908, votato wrote:ill be around more after work to figure this out. I'm ok with going for a farside wagon.
i dont understand any of what farside just said ^
My experience shows no one clicks on the spoiler to read quote walls.
Well the tldr version of my post in regards to hk is
1. I don't know why he scum reads dunn.
2. I liked his push on ns
3. I think scum would continue with a post restriction and not make long post as he did.
4. Although I disagreed with what he views between you and sg I can understand the thought process.
You make me sad.
Meh I see a few things he said is what I felt. Still don't like his lack of explanation about mala but it's not that mala has done anything that rings town so it's a wash.In post 936, DoctorPepper wrote:Btw, none of what Dunn has posted is making me more comfortable, especially since I'm told I'm coasting on a vote for him despite me disliking his content early on and, idk, me being onV/LA
Switch to GC with me hell vote NS. I made a great post of his surface level reads without pushing anything and he's turned it into a magical scum read on me.