Because then it's a fakeclaim that gets Prana 100% killed.In post 1611, Hiraki wrote:No - why doesn't he target Agar, then say that Hoopla is on Agar.
Now there's this 5% window that even you are considering.
Think of it like this - if scum!Prana claims to have targeted AGar, and seen someone - they would get killed 100% of the time after the guilty is proven false.In post 1616, Hiraki wrote:I'm starting to believe that Prana is just VI and not scum because the scum motivations for this move are becoming ever increasingly small. At the same time, the town motivations for this move are also very small.
If Prana claims to have been blocked, it's pretty much the same as it is now, but it raises the questions of why Flippy wasn't blocked N1, why AGar would'nt have been blocked N2 to be sure, etc etc.
It also awakens the thought process of "we should just make sure and lynch Prana today because we won't be getting a result from them anymore".
So they decided to take cover behind the talk of WIFOM, and having an obv.town in me.
But read what I posted earlier.
I was objectively less of a conf.town last night than AGar was, AND AGar had a powerful role for scum to want neutralized.
What Prana is saying might come across as a "stubborn VI" sure, but that is also the only reasonable escape-path for scum!Prana at this point.