Newbie 2012 - Game Over
Forum rules
- 72offsuit
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- 72offsuit
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
- DoctorPepper
-
DoctorPepper Coca-Cola
- DoctorPepper
- Coca-Cola
- Coca-Cola
- Posts: 4746
- Joined: March 7, 2013
- Location: In an office chair "working"
... you hammered without a claim- 72offsuit
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- 72offsuit
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
- 72offsuit
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- 72offsuit
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
So what was the benefit for! ScumMe to hammer there?In post 701, GuiltyLion wrote:
This is why we need to spend more time on UNOwen, Ydrasse, Mini, and myself. 72 strikes me as a pretty capable player, I don't think he instahammers unless there's a benefit to him. Like I said, I think the worst case scenario is his partner is Ydrasse or UNOwen and set to have a really good chance to endgame, in which case we need to do as much as we can to give ourselves a chance at solving them. I myself don't want to be an easy mislynch for scum hereIn post 698, ItalianoVD wrote:If 72 is scum, he has played this game very poorly imo- 72offsuit
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- 72offsuit
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
Ydrasse, i ask: show me evidence HOW the TTJT wagon was losing momentum, quoting posts that suggests this was the case.In post 710, Ydrasse wrote:@italiano:
Spoiler:
how is saying that it's self preservation false? fmpov, scum!72 sees that one of the wagons (that he was first upon) is dying out, leaving him competing with another one. one of the safety options is gone and he has to make sure that he as scum is not lynched, so he throws down a hammer onto jt and claims it's an accident so that things cannot be turned back onto him.
especially given the fact that, like i said, dp at that point was adamant about it being either dp or 72. a scum!72 realizes that in the event that it's between him and dp, and if dp goes down first there's a high chance the town focuses in on him the next day. that, or he gets voted off that day (meaning day 1) outright. so instead, it's better to turn the hammer onto someone outside of those two so he doesn't have to continue dealing with the pressure of dp's tunneling and insistence it's between them two. it's another option that, from his pov, could present greater odds of getting through the day.
and which part didn't i mention then? do you mean why didn't i mention my misgivings when it came to dp, or the fact that i thought his content had improved? the former i feel can be seen in that my vote was STILL on dp for a reason — he had gotten townier, but it isn't outside a realm of possibility that he was still scum to me given the fact of where his suspicions rested. a lot of this wasn't mentioned because i was gone from the time after i had asked dp some stuff and when 72 was hammered, and the hammer itself made me reconsider a lot of things at eod.
Spoiler:
1) i said what the hell because i came back to 72 claiming that he hadn't seen the vote on dp at all. it was a mess to come back to, lmfao.
2) yes. i voted for him when i thought he was scummy, and my vote stayed there after because despite improvements i still thought there was a chance dp could be scum.
3) yeah, that's fair, which is why my vote is on 72 as it is. in context with everything else it doesn't seem like it was an accidental vote given how much 72 benefited from it in that moment, but i have to consider all the possibilities.
4) ii still have some suspicions that are lingering in that pool i presented. i haven't gotten around to iso'ing either of you yet. i'm going to do it sometime during this day. you're not as high on my scumread list though, after that fiasco in d1.
for owen i have to reread, because i don't remember him ever making a push on me and i don't understand why he's saying that i'm one of two required partners for 72, and instead saying that you brought up a good point and then not offering his own opinions from the reread that he did. his response to guiltylion in 695 seems deflective of the pressure put onto him imo without giving reasons.
5) like i said, the 72 hammer made me rethink a lot of things pretty quickly.
-
what about you? i know you posted a reads list in 541, but i assume that's changed at this point?- 72offsuit
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- 72offsuit
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
In post 710, Ydrasse wrote:@italiano:
Spoiler:
how is saying that it's self preservation false? fmpov, scum!72 sees that one of the wagons (that he was first upon) is dying out, leaving him competing with another one. one of the safety options is gone and he has to make sure that he as scum is not lynched, so he throws down a hammer onto jt and claims it's an accident so that things cannot be turned back onto him.
especially given the fact that, like i said, dp at that point was adamant about it being either dp or 72. a scum!72 realizes that in the event that it's between him and dp, and if dp goes down first there's a high chance the town focuses in on him the next day. that, or he gets voted off that day (meaning day 1) outright. so instead, it's better to turn the hammer onto someone outside of those two so he doesn't have to continue dealing with the pressure of dp's tunneling and insistence it's between them two. it's another option that, from his pov, could present greater odds of getting through the day.
and which part didn't i mention then? do you mean why didn't i mention my misgivings when it came to dp, or the fact that i thought his content had improved? the former i feel can be seen in that my vote was STILL on dp for a reason — he had gotten townier, but it isn't outside a realm of possibility that he was still scum to me given the fact of where his suspicions rested. a lot of this wasn't mentioned because i was gone from the time after i had asked dp some stuff and when 72 was hammered, and the hammer itself made me reconsider a lot of things at eod.
Spoiler:
1) i said what the hell because i came back to 72 claiming that he hadn't seen the vote on dp at all. it was a mess to come back to, lmfao.
2) yes. i voted for him when i thought he was scummy, and my vote stayed there after because despite improvements i still thought there was a chance dp could be scum.
3) yeah, that's fair, which is why my vote is on 72 as it is. in context with everything else it doesn't seem like it was an accidental vote given how much 72 benefited from it in that moment, but i have to consider all the possibilities.
4) ii still have some suspicions that are lingering in that pool i presented. i haven't gotten around to iso'ing either of you yet. i'm going to do it sometime during this day. you're not as high on my scumread list though, after that fiasco in d1.
for owen i have to reread, because i don't remember him ever making a push on me and i don't understand why he's saying that i'm one of two required partners for 72, and instead saying that you brought up a good point and then not offering his own opinions from the reread that he did. his response to guiltylion in 695 seems deflective of the pressure put onto him imo without giving reasons.
5) like i said, the 72 hammer made me rethink a lot of things pretty quickly.
-
what about you? i know you posted a reads list in 541, but i assume that's changed at this point?
Who gives 2 hoots that DP was adamant about lynching between the 2 of us. How does that affect !ScumMe's approach? DP is ALREADY voting for me, so cannot pose a further threat to! ScumMe.- 72offsuit
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- 72offsuit
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
In post 710, Ydrasse wrote:@italiano:
Spoiler:
how is saying that it's self preservation false? fmpov, scum!72 sees that one of the wagons (that he was first upon) is dying out, leaving him competing with another one. one of the safety options is gone and he has to make sure that he as scum is not lynched, so he throws down a hammer onto jt and claims it's an accident so that things cannot be turned back onto him.
especially given the fact that, like i said, dp at that point was adamant about it being either dp or 72. a scum!72 realizes that in the event that it's between him and dp, and if dp goes down first there's a high chance the town focuses in on him the next day. that, or he gets voted off that day (meaning day 1) outright. so instead, it's better to turn the hammer onto someone outside of those two so he doesn't have to continue dealing with the pressure of dp's tunneling and insistence it's between them two. it's another option that, from his pov, could present greater odds of getting through the day.
and which part didn't i mention then? do you mean why didn't i mention my misgivings when it came to dp, or the fact that i thought his content had improved? the former i feel can be seen in that my vote was STILL on dp for a reason — he had gotten townier, but it isn't outside a realm of possibility that he was still scum to me given the fact of where his suspicions rested. a lot of this wasn't mentioned because i was gone from the time after i had asked dp some stuff and when 72 was hammered, and the hammer itself made me reconsider a lot of things at eod.
Spoiler:
1) i said what the hell because i came back to 72 claiming that he hadn't seen the vote on dp at all. it was a mess to come back to, lmfao.
2) yes. i voted for him when i thought he was scummy, and my vote stayed there after because despite improvements i still thought there was a chance dp could be scum.
3) yeah, that's fair, which is why my vote is on 72 as it is. in context with everything else it doesn't seem like it was an accidental vote given how much 72 benefited from it in that moment, but i have to consider all the possibilities.
4) ii still have some suspicions that are lingering in that pool i presented. i haven't gotten around to iso'ing either of you yet. i'm going to do it sometime during this day. you're not as high on my scumread list though, after that fiasco in d1.
for owen i have to reread, because i don't remember him ever making a push on me and i don't understand why he's saying that i'm one of two required partners for 72, and instead saying that you brought up a good point and then not offering his own opinions from the reread that he did. his response to guiltylion in 695 seems deflective of the pressure put onto him imo without giving reasons.
5) like i said, the 72 hammer made me rethink a lot of things pretty quickly.
-
what about you? i know you posted a reads list in 541, but i assume that's changed at this point?
Who gives 2 hoots that DP was adamant about lynching between the 2 of us. How does that affect !ScumMe's approach? DP is ALREADY voting for me, so cannot pose a further threat to! ScumMe.- 72offsuit
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- 72offsuit
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
In post 710, Ydrasse wrote:@italiano:
Spoiler:
how is saying that it's self preservation false? fmpov, scum!72 sees that one of the wagons (that he was first upon) is dying out, leaving him competing with another one. one of the safety options is gone and he has to make sure that he as scum is not lynched, so he throws down a hammer onto jt and claims it's an accident so that things cannot be turned back onto him.
especially given the fact that, like i said, dp at that point was adamant about it being either dp or 72. a scum!72 realizes that in the event that it's between him and dp, and if dp goes down first there's a high chance the town focuses in on him the next day. that, or he gets voted off that day (meaning day 1) outright. so instead, it's better to turn the hammer onto someone outside of those two so he doesn't have to continue dealing with the pressure of dp's tunneling and insistence it's between them two. it's another option that, from his pov, could present greater odds of getting through the day.
and which part didn't i mention then? do you mean why didn't i mention my misgivings when it came to dp, or the fact that i thought his content had improved? the former i feel can be seen in that my vote was STILL on dp for a reason — he had gotten townier, but it isn't outside a realm of possibility that he was still scum to me given the fact of where his suspicions rested. a lot of this wasn't mentioned because i was gone from the time after i had asked dp some stuff and when 72 was hammered, and the hammer itself made me reconsider a lot of things at eod.
Spoiler:
1) i said what the hell because i came back to 72 claiming that he hadn't seen the vote on dp at all. it was a mess to come back to, lmfao.
2) yes. i voted for him when i thought he was scummy, and my vote stayed there after because despite improvements i still thought there was a chance dp could be scum.
3) yeah, that's fair, which is why my vote is on 72 as it is. in context with everything else it doesn't seem like it was an accidental vote given how much 72 benefited from it in that moment, but i have to consider all the possibilities.
4) ii still have some suspicions that are lingering in that pool i presented. i haven't gotten around to iso'ing either of you yet. i'm going to do it sometime during this day. you're not as high on my scumread list though, after that fiasco in d1.
for owen i have to reread, because i don't remember him ever making a push on me and i don't understand why he's saying that i'm one of two required partners for 72, and instead saying that you brought up a good point and then not offering his own opinions from the reread that he did. his response to guiltylion in 695 seems deflective of the pressure put onto him imo without giving reasons.
5) like i said, the 72 hammer made me rethink a lot of things pretty quickly.
-
what about you? i know you posted a reads list in 541, but i assume that's changed at this point?
Who gives 2 hoots that DP was adamant about lynching between the 2 of us. How does that affect !ScumMe's approach? DP is ALREADY voting for me, so cannot pose a further threat to! ScumMe.- 72offsuit
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- 72offsuit
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
- ItalianoVD
-
ItalianoVD HeMafia Scum
- ItalianoVD
He- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2701
- Joined: May 19, 2020
- Pronoun: He
- Location: Interregnum Multiverse
You’re either a great scum or a townie because this was pretty good. Just basing it on how it sounds and looks, I’d have to say I don’t feel any scummy vibes, but like I said you could be playing a great town role. For now I’m gonna trust you.In post 710, Ydrasse wrote:@italiano:
Spoiler:
how is saying that it's self preservation false? fmpov, scum!72 sees that one of the wagons (that he was first upon) is dying out, leaving him competing with another one. one of the safety options is gone and he has to make sure that he as scum is not lynched, so he throws down a hammer onto jt and claims it's an accident so that things cannot be turned back onto him.
especially given the fact that, like i said, dp at that point was adamant about it being either dp or 72. a scum!72 realizes that in the event that it's between him and dp, and if dp goes down first there's a high chance the town focuses in on him the next day. that, or he gets voted off that day (meaning day 1) outright. so instead, it's better to turn the hammer onto someone outside of those two so he doesn't have to continue dealing with the pressure of dp's tunneling and insistence it's between them two. it's another option that, from his pov, could present greater odds of getting through the day.
and which part didn't i mention then? do you mean why didn't i mention my misgivings when it came to dp, or the fact that i thought his content had improved? the former i feel can be seen in that my vote was STILL on dp for a reason — he had gotten townier, but it isn't outside a realm of possibility that he was still scum to me given the fact of where his suspicions rested. a lot of this wasn't mentioned because i was gone from the time after i had asked dp some stuff and when 72 was hammered, and the hammer itself made me reconsider a lot of things at eod.
Spoiler:
1) i said what the hell because i came back to 72 claiming that he hadn't seen the vote on dp at all. it was a mess to come back to, lmfao.
2) yes. i voted for him when i thought he was scummy, and my vote stayed there after because despite improvements i still thought there was a chance dp could be scum.
3) yeah, that's fair, which is why my vote is on 72 as it is. in context with everything else it doesn't seem like it was an accidental vote given how much 72 benefited from it in that moment, but i have to consider all the possibilities.
4) ii still have some suspicions that are lingering in that pool i presented. i haven't gotten around to iso'ing either of you yet. i'm going to do it sometime during this day. you're not as high on my scumread list though, after that fiasco in d1.
for owen i have to reread, because i don't remember him ever making a push on me and i don't understand why he's saying that i'm one of two required partners for 72, and instead saying that you brought up a good point and then not offering his own opinions from the reread that he did. his response to guiltylion in 695 seems deflective of the pressure put onto him imo without giving reasons.
5) like i said, the 72 hammer made me rethink a lot of things pretty quickly.
In post 710, Ydrasse wrote: what about you? i know you posted a reads list in 541, but i assume that's changed at this point?In post 696, ItalianoVD wrote:For the record when something is too easy in this game I have always questioned it and always will. I only have trust in myself at the moment. I know I townread the people I did and scumread the people I did, but I feel I need to throw all that out and start fresh. The worse thing I could do if believe that I'm not wrong on my reads. The final moments of Day 1 and the lack of a night kill makes me think this way.- ItalianoVD
-
ItalianoVD HeMafia Scum
- ItalianoVD
He- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2701
- Joined: May 19, 2020
- Pronoun: He
- Location: Interregnum Multiverse
Because in my mind I knew Walter was suspicious of you. Ydrasse said her bit about you and DoctorPepper. I figured Walter to vote you. I figured Ydrasse would go back over the scenario again and possibly vote you. This is after JT tied up the score so I thought it was very possible for it to play out the way it did in my mind.In post 712, 72offsuit wrote:
Why were you expecting mpre votes on me?In post 676, ItalianoVD wrote:Huh? I see a lot has happened. I was expecting 72 to be the one getting the votes. I was certain Walter was gonna vote for him since he had suspicions of him earlier. Voting for TTJT was kind of weird for me. And after 72’s move onto TTJT I have to assume JT is town because if 72 is scum it would be extremely dumb to bus your partner when you didn’t have to. Unless neither of them are scum. I don’t know what to think now. I wish it was as easy and JT flips scum, but if not I don’t see why we shouldn’t/wouldn’t vote for 72 on Day 2. That’s who I expected to go anyway. Ehh.
Sure you can say it, but I don’t believe you. And if you’re careless like that now, who’s to say you won’t be careless like that later?In post 713, 72offsuit wrote:
I can say that and that's what happened.In post 678, ItalianoVD wrote:
You can’t tell me that you weren’t aware of the vote count. That just doesn’t make sense to me.In post 578, 72offsuit wrote:Suddenly TTJT's top scumreads are the top 2 wagons.
Yeah nah.
VOTE: TTJT
You’re “mistake” was careless as townie and calculated as scum. Neither helps town which is why I’m voting for you. I can’t and won’t speak for anyone else.In post 714, 72offsuit wrote:
What point are you trying to make in this post?In post 679, ItalianoVD wrote:
At best you’re bad townie, so either way it’s not a help to the town.In post 590, 72offsuit wrote:Lol. Nice so im scum either way. Fits nicely with your tunnel- ItalianoVD
-
ItalianoVD HeMafia Scum
- ItalianoVD
He- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2701
- Joined: May 19, 2020
- Pronoun: He
- Location: Interregnum Multiverse
Ydrasse wouldn’t surprise me actually. One thing that hasn’t changed however is my read on UNOwen. Mini is an outlier. I think that slot is cursed It seems like it’s a scum slot that the newbies don’t know how to play. I guess I wouldn’t be surprised with you either, but unfortunately anything that I have towards you is only speculation and hypotheticals, so with nothing I’m choosing to trust you for now.In post 701, GuiltyLion wrote:
This is why we need to spend more time on UNOwen, Ydrasse, Mini, and myself. 72 strikes me as a pretty capable player, I don't think he instahammers unless there's a benefit to him. Like I said, I think the worst case scenario is his partner is Ydrasse or UNOwen and set to have a really good chance to endgame, in which case we need to do as much as we can to give ourselves a chance at solving them. I myself don't want to be an easy mislynch for scum hereIn post 698, ItalianoVD wrote:If 72 is scum, he has played this game very poorly imo- ItalianoVD
-
ItalianoVD HeMafia Scum
- ItalianoVD
He- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2701
- Joined: May 19, 2020
- Pronoun: He
- Location: Interregnum Multiverse
- UNOwen
-
UNOwen Mafia Scum
- UNOwen
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1143
- Joined: June 14, 2020
- UNOwen
-
UNOwen Mafia Scum
- UNOwen
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1143
- Joined: June 14, 2020
With GuiltyLion's "bad play" point: If 72 had a motive for quickhammering JT, then clearly so did his scumpartner.
If the question is "why would scum be so brazen?" then the answer is that they think people will ask that question and let them get away with it. Especially in this case where GuiltyLion came right out the gates pushing that defence. It's just a logic trap and not really worth trying to outguess.
A better way to determine his alignment is based on what he says, so I look forward to hearing him expand on 718.- UNOwen
-
UNOwen Mafia Scum
- UNOwen
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1143
- Joined: June 14, 2020
Not sure why this is odd, the point was straightforward and I agreed with it. Your explanation is that you reconsidered after 72 hammered, which doesn't seem all that coherent (if someone is getting townier and townier, but it takes the person they were pushing against scumclaiming for that to be obvious, then they weren't getting townier and townier). I know you have said you were thinking his posts had improved anyway and just didn't have the opportunity to mention it but I can only take your word for that.In post 710, Ydrasse wrote: for owen i have to reread, because i don't remember him ever making a push on me and i don't understand why he's saying that i'm one of two required partners for 72,and instead saying that you brought up a good point and then not offering his own opinions from the reread that he did. his response to guiltylion in 695 seems deflective of the pressure put onto him imo without giving reasons.
For why you are on the suspect list: there's nothing stand out bad about your posts. The only notable thing is your odd prioritisation for iso's, which you were already asked about during day 1. So generally you are town-read and have not faced any pressure. That is exactly the sort of position I could see 72 staking the game on. If you are not so confident on GL-72, who else do you think 72's scumpartner could be?- GuiltyLion
-
GuiltyLion he/himSurvivor
- GuiltyLion
he/him- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12369
- Joined: August 19, 2015
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle, WA
so first things first, I don't think 1 is likely - I can't think of a single time I have seen a scum team fail to submit a kill because both players were inactive, and every player in this game has been online and posted since. I think we should assume 2-4 for all intents and purposes.In post 704, DoctorPepper wrote:No death N1 has 5 possibilities:
1. Mafia was not able to submit a factional kill (indicating someone who may have forgotten about the game or site-flaked)
2. Doctor blocks the night kill
3. Jailkeeper blocks the night kill by correctly targetting the Night Kill
4. Jailkeeper blocks the night kill by correctly targetting the Mafia assigned to do the NK.
5. Mafia submits no kill on purpose
I don't want to go in assuming it's 2-4 when 1 could be likely. I also think that while 5 is unlikely for a newbie, I would not put it past any of you to be that bold at Day 2"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"- GuiltyLion
-
GuiltyLion he/himSurvivor
- GuiltyLion
he/him- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12369
- Joined: August 19, 2015
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle, WA
1) Frankly I just thought it was likely we had at least one mafia in the two given how the day was playing out. It could have been T-T, but that wasn't what I was considering at the timeIn post 708, ItalianoVD wrote:Guilty Lion, in post 556 you mentioned: "I'm having a hard time figuring out exactly what I think the associative between TTJT and DocPep is, whether it's T-S in either direction or S-S. I can find evidence a few different ways but nothing that feels conclusive to me, and assuming there's scum involved then there's likely some intentional manipulation being attempted as well."
Two questions:
1) Why was there no mention of T-T?
2) How do you feel now? Now that JT flipped townie? Is DoctorPepper the Scum?
2) Given 72's hammer and the way DoctorPepper had continued the engagement prior to and past that point, my read on 72 soured dramatically, and I don't think DoctorPepper is likely to be mafia anymore."I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"- GuiltyLion
-
GuiltyLion he/himSurvivor
- GuiltyLion
he/him- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12369
- Joined: August 19, 2015
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle, WA
This is a fair response. I guess my pride in myself as a scum player is more on the line when I'm making that defense than my actual alignment in this gameIn post 739, UNOwen wrote:With GuiltyLion's "bad play" point: If 72 had a motive for quickhammering JT, then clearly so did his scumpartner.
If the question is "why would scum be so brazen?" then the answer is that they think people will ask that question and let them get away with it. Especially in this case where GuiltyLion came right out the gates pushing that defence. It's just a logic trap and not really worth trying to outguess."I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"- GuiltyLion
-
GuiltyLion he/himSurvivor
- GuiltyLion
he/him- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12369
- Joined: August 19, 2015
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle, WA
I've honestly been trawling through UNOwen/Ydrasse's D2 responses and their ISO and it's hard for me to find things that stand out as disingenuous, if either of them are scum they're playing really solidly
I guess as a starting point, UNOwen I want to get more of your thoughts on this. Are you really comfortable totally ruling out Mini as a partner based on this logic? I get where you're coming from and I've been thinking much the same way, but I think I still have hesitation in that if his partnerIn post 695, UNOwen wrote:Basically 72 scum requires his partner to be either you or Ydrasse.
72's push against DrP was uneccessary from a scum perspective, unless he bought in to the "softing" talk in which case he was aggressively pr hunting. That's not a way to play when your partner is everyone's compromise lynch.isthe compromise lynch and now he's perceiving that he's losing a 1v1 with DP - what if he felt the loss was inevitable if he was hammered yesterday and hence he took the first opportunity to guarantee survival for at least one more day?
I know I'm assuming the conclusion there instead of showing why the evidence supports the conclusion, but I don't know if I want to completely rule out the plausibility of 72/Mini pairing solely on the idea that 72 would have slow played it a little more in that case. You seem to be saying you are willing to do that, and that you'd chain eliminate Ydrasse and myself back to back, and I want to know if you don't have any doubts/uncertainty about that"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"- GuiltyLion
-
GuiltyLion he/himSurvivor
- GuiltyLion
he/him- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12369
- Joined: August 19, 2015
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle, WA
I've also been revisiting these posts from 72 immediately after my 218, particularly these sections
This first part seems to be meant to shade my pressure on the pi slot and also say that it's bad because !scumSera could handle my pressure? I hadn't caught this before but it's a bit weird that 72 thinks my vote is bad because scum will be able to handle it - it still means I'm voting scum.In post 234, 72offsuit wrote: 4. Voting a replacing out/AFK player feels like a waste of a vote, and basically suiting scum agenda its not like pi can reply.
Even in getting a reply from the replacement here, its very easy for !scumSera to read the thread and take the path thats best suits scumagenda, as they are not tied to their predecessors "reads"
Voting/FoSing a lurker in !townPi/now-Sera (easy mislynch target), as well as a "competent" player in myself (removal of a potential threat), would certainly suit !scumagenda.
Obviously that depends on pi/Sera's alignment. [not that I;m a particularly good player or anything, but I do ahave a couple of games under my belt]
There's also a hedge on Sera throughout, and a significant portion of the rest of 234 (too much to quote but I suggest going back to the post) is meant to discredit my townreads on TTJT and UNOwen, I suspect potentially as a means of distraction on the pii/Sera/Mini vote if you're town UNOwen.
I'm also kinda suspicious again here by him ultimately evolving from a {TTJT/Uno} pool to a DoctorPepper push - while also being open to voting pi/Sera without explicitly putting them in an elimination pool. Again, would like to see if you agree on this UNOwen - if you're town and I'm scum, why does he categorize pi/Sera separately rather than just having a three person elimination pool?In post 236, 72offsuit wrote:Overall gamestate-wise, Pii lurking and being replaced and DP being on VLA has resulted in the same (relatively) few people posting.
Uno is still on IVD (the leading wagon), who Uno originally voted for in RVS, which is telling, I think, given Uno is also a leading wagon.
My preferred lynchpool is {TTJT , Uno}
As it stands, I wouldn't lose sleep over lynching pi/Sera if it comes to it.
These things don't look so bad in ISO as associatives when uncertain about 72's slot, but if I assume that he's scum, I think it points to pi/Sera over UNOwen."I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"- GuiltyLion
-
GuiltyLion he/himSurvivor
- GuiltyLion
he/him- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12369
- Joined: August 19, 2015
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle, WA
The shift that happens here is also pretty noteworthy now that we know TTJT is town
The situation was this: 72offsuit driving a TTJT wagon, I had joined as the third vote, and we were actively pressuring Mini who seemed tentative/unwilling to commit on TTJT.Then, Mini caves and votes TTJT in 387. This put TTJT to L-1.
Immediately afterwards in 403 is when 72 starts his push on DP. Which leads to the next VC looking like this:I think a plausible explanation for the DP push is this (assuming a scum!Mini partner): 72 noticed that both scum were on a wagon on town, and got nervous about how this was not setting them up well for D2 as townies tend to look for at least one scum on-wagon, and two of the off-wagon slots (Ydrasse/Walter) were very widely townread. Thus, by starting a push on DP, he either shifts attention away from TTJT (which leads to TTJT being a viable elimination candidate later in the game if DP wagon goes through), or he sets himself up to push DP again on D2 and also for townies to make themselves look worse by piling on TTJT past this point.
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"- UNOwen
-
UNOwen Mafia Scum
- UNOwen
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1143
- Joined: June 14, 2020
If we take this hypothetical and say 72 feels the situation is desperate, I don't know why he decides to kamikaze himself instead of attempting to throw Mini under the bus - something he had already set up. We are agreed he is a strong player, even if he was under pressure do we really think he decides Mini is the better bet to win the game than he is?In post 744, GuiltyLion wrote: I guess as a starting point, UNOwen I want to get more of your thoughts on this. Are you really comfortable totally ruling out Mini as a partner based on this logic? I get where you're coming from and I've been thinking much the same way, but I think I still have hesitation in that if his partneristhe compromise lynch and now he's perceiving that he's losing a 1v1 with DP - what if he felt the loss was inevitable if he was hammered yesterday and hence he took the first opportunity to guarantee survival for at least one more day?
Day 1 ended in a way that I was so sure wouldn't happen that I actually suspected JT for entertaining the possibility, so I'm aware that I need to keep an open mind. However I am confident in my logic here and I am confident it is either you or Ydrasse.In post 744, GuiltyLion wrote: I know I'm assuming the conclusion there instead of showing why the evidence supports the conclusion, but I don't know if I want to completely rule out the plausibility of 72/Mini pairing solely on the idea that 72 would have slow played it a little more in that case. You seem to be saying you are willing to do that, and that you'd chain eliminate Ydrasse and myself back to back, and I want to know if you don't have any doubts/uncertainty about that- UNOwen
-
UNOwen Mafia Scum
- UNOwen
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1143
- Joined: June 14, 2020
I don't know the answer to your question, but I don't think it is as significant as you suggest. Both myself and JT were "scumreads" whereas pi was just a lurker. So there's a logic to the post even if he was faking it. I see what you are saying, that he was keeping pi on the table but out of the limelight. I'm not convinced that is the obvious motivation behind the post.In post 745, GuiltyLion wrote: I'm also kinda suspicious again here by him ultimately evolving from a {TTJT/Uno} pool to a DoctorPepper push - while also being open to voting pi/Sera without explicitly putting them in an elimination pool. Again, would like to see if you agree on this UNOwen - if you're town and I'm scum, why does he categorize pi/Sera separately rather than just having a three person elimination pool?
Not a fan of the vote analysis because it skips over a couple of important points that are not reflected in the vote count:
1) 72 had already unvoted JT by the time Mini joined the wagon
2) His next vote was then against Mini (which clashes with your suggestion above about 72 keeping the slot out of attention)
I might just be tired but I don't understand what you're saying in the bolded - could you rephrase that?In post 746, GuiltyLion wrote: I think a plausible explanation for the DP push is this (assuming a scum!Mini partner): 72 noticed that both scum were on a wagon on town, and got nervous abouthow this was not setting them up well for D2 as townies tend to look for at least one scum on-wagon, and two of the off-wagon slots (Ydrasse/Walter) were very widely townread.Thus, by starting a push on DP, he either shifts attention away from TTJT (which leads to TTJT being a viable elimination candidate later in the game if DP wagon goes through), or he sets himself up to push DP again on D2 and also for townies to make themselves look worse by piling on TTJT past this point.
On the broader theory, yes that is plausible, though it also fits with you as the partner. Once 72 unvoted JT, he changed his pool to {Mini, DrP} and actually voted against Mini in 383. He then switched his vote to DrP in 404, which is after 395 from DrP, the post both you and Italiano interpreted as a pr soft. So that tallies with my idea that he was pr hunting.
I think you've raised some reasonable points but in the end this is the scenario 72-Mini requires: 72 knows his scum partner is not trusted by anyone, very new to the game and liable to be voted out at some point. He decides the best play is to make an attention grabbing push against DoctorPepper even though the lead wagon is a townie. When this counter push meets resistance he recalculates, decides the best he can hope for is to survive to day 2 and quickhammers in the hope that Mini can win the game from there.
I don't believe that. The alternative is that 72 has a well positioned scum partner, who he has confidence can win the game and then it becomes more plausible. The risky play is less risky and the quickhammer calculation is more reasonable (presuming he suspected JT was a pr).Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
- UNOwen
- UNOwen
- GuiltyLion
- GuiltyLion
- GuiltyLion
- GuiltyLion
- GuiltyLion
- GuiltyLion
- UNOwen
- UNOwen
- UNOwen
- ItalianoVD
- ItalianoVD
- ItalianoVD
- ItalianoVD
- 72offsuit
- 72offsuit
- 72offsuit
- 72offsuit
- 72offsuit
- 72offsuit
- 72offsuit
- DoctorPepper
- 72offsuit