Mini Normal 2149 | Philosophers | Over
Forum rules
- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
VOTE: NdMath
I like the look of 1944 from the parts I've skimmed so far and I've been thinking this lurking is his scum meta
I think the last few posts by Truth where he's trying to really sell there being a mason who thinks differently from paints a bad picture; Blair is still alive to get nightkilled so I don't get what he would be thinking if he was town, and he only claimed under pressure today- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
Why 4% NDMath? Why 41% Nauci?
- Blair
-
Blair Mafia Scum
- Blair
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2419
- Joined: October 4, 2013
- Location: Leavesden, Hertfordshire
I actually agree with you here that 551 looks pretty bad in context now that we know Popo was scum (Mavs was voting for Popo, then four other people vote for Popo, then Mavs switches to GuiltyLion without even acknowledging that he is exiting the Popo wagon).In post 1948, Truth wrote:I think Dunnstral is most likely mafia for the way mavsfan attacked po early but then asked about why people were voting po when other people actually started voting him, and he started calling it a policy lynch instead of looking at the actual reasons.
VOTE: Dunnstral“There is nothing so dangerous for anyone who has something to hide as conversation! A human being [...] cannot resist the opportunity to reveal himself and express his personality which conversation gives him. Every time he will give himself away.” -Hercule Poirot- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
In post 554, popopopopopopo wrote:LicketyQuickety- town lean his vote on me was bad but quick likes an illogical bad push as much as anyone so it doesnt surprise me he voted me. his incessant pushing on truth early feels town motivated coming from this particular player.
NorwegianboyEE- town lean i explained already
Looker - town lean responded well to my request for reads even if we dont completely agree
osuka- null town feels like a saudade type player where he just calls people retards and argues. hard to read, but the argument with truth seemed genuine enough
Truth - any read i have is irrelevant, mechanics will sort. im more inclined to believe the claim than not.
Glitch - null seems like a noob. i find this type of player hard to sort. at least looks like hes trying.
Nauci - null his early posts pinged me as forced, he has been posting more thoughtfully since.
Candy Shop - null dont really have an impression of this slot, this is the NL guy right? ok i checked his ISO. idk
ndmath - null no impression of this slot
mavsfan41 - null-scum him coming in with a vote immediately after i call him out is not a good look
GuiltyLion- scum lean i explained
Cat Scratch Fever- scummy his vote was opportunistic and his iso has been bad, handing out townreads like candy and little scumreads is mafia indicative especially early game- Blair
-
Blair Mafia Scum
- Blair
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2419
- Joined: October 4, 2013
- Location: Leavesden, Hertfordshire
I can't quite put my finger on it, but I kind of hate this post.In post 1950, Dunnstral wrote:VOTE: NdMath
I like the look of 1944 from the parts I've skimmed so far and I've been thinking this lurking is his scum meta
I think the last few posts by Truth where he's trying to really sell there being a mason who thinks differently from paints a bad picture; Blair is still alive to get nightkilled so I don't get what he would be thinking if he was town, and he only claimed under pressure today“There is nothing so dangerous for anyone who has something to hide as conversation! A human being [...] cannot resist the opportunity to reveal himself and express his personality which conversation gives him. Every time he will give himself away.” -Hercule Poirot- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
In post 1693, Blair wrote:Ok.
Popopo Vig Tonight: Truth
VOTE: NDMath
That should clear up quite a few things I think?Votes ndmath here but it's after he's already claimed vig when he knows there's a town vig in the setup
- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
In post 1955, Blair wrote:
I can't quite put my finger on it, but I kind of hate this post.In post 1950, Dunnstral wrote:VOTE: NdMath
I like the look of 1944 from the parts I've skimmed so far and I've been thinking this lurking is his scum meta
I think the last few posts by Truth where he's trying to really sell there being a mason who thinks differently from paints a bad picture; Blair is still alive to get nightkilled so I don't get what he would be thinking if he was town, and he only claimed under pressure today*throws up hands*
I'll be honest, I haven't read most of the game. I like/respect Glitch's wall posts and cases, and I was suspecting NDMath due to having played a scum game with him where he very much lurked it out in the main thread- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
- Blair
-
Blair Mafia Scum
- Blair
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2419
- Joined: October 4, 2013
- Location: Leavesden, Hertfordshire
Trouble is we have three slots that haven't given us much to actually sort them with. (Truth, NDMath, Looker)“There is nothing so dangerous for anyone who has something to hide as conversation! A human being [...] cannot resist the opportunity to reveal himself and express his personality which conversation gives him. Every time he will give himself away.” -Hercule Poirot- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
- Blair
-
Blair Mafia Scum
- Blair
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2419
- Joined: October 4, 2013
- Location: Leavesden, Hertfordshire
Yeah, that's what I didn’t like about it. The fact that it would ping my scumdar regardless of Truth's alignment.In post 1958, Dunnstral wrote:I'm on the side of not voting Truth today because I can imagine this sort of stunt coming from town, I'm pointing out the parts that leave me skeptical despite that
(If he's town, you're voting elsewhere while setting up a mislynch in the next phase [no way he's getting night killed] - if he's scum you're voting elsewhere while going on the record as scumreading him)“There is nothing so dangerous for anyone who has something to hide as conversation! A human being [...] cannot resist the opportunity to reveal himself and express his personality which conversation gives him. Every time he will give himself away.” -Hercule Poirot- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Glitch
-
Glitch Mafia Scum
- Glitch
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1056
- Joined: April 24, 2015
- Location: Houston, TX
- Dunnstral
-
Dunnstral Survivor
- Dunnstral
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 37035
- Joined: April 2, 2016
- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
Why the fuck were you not making posts like this for the first 77 pages lmaoIn post 1948, Truth wrote:I think Dunnstral is most likely mafia for the way mavsfan attacked po early but then asked about why people were voting po when other people actually started voting him, and he started calling it a policy lynch instead of looking at the actual reasons.
VOTE: Dunnstral- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
NGL I kind of wish Looker was your policy vig, esp n1In post 1959, Blair wrote:Trouble is we have three slots that haven't given us much to actually sort them with. (Truth, NDMath, Looker)- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
actin' like you didn't see me fake that same shit when we were just scum togetherIn post 1964, Dunnstral wrote:Giant wall of text with a tone of authority = town player
I'm hurt, dawg- Deimos27
-
Deimos27 Mafia Scum
- Deimos27
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2246
- Joined: October 16, 2016
- Location: Finland/UK
Carol Gilligan (1936-) originated "ethics of care", a moral philosophy that emphasizes situational responses based on interpersonal relationships and the virtue of caring.
Mod notes:Last edited by Deimos27 on Sun Jul 05, 2020 3:03 am, edited 1 time in total.- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
- Looker
-
Looker Stenographer
- Looker
- Stenographer
- Stenographer
- Posts: 5161
- Joined: February 20, 2009
I think it'd be more accurate to say I voted him my first post of the day. And, in the interest of challenging your survivalism, what would questions and pushes of "remarkable strength" look like to you? Beyond voting, I mean.In post 1944, Glitch wrote:Looker: Continuously questions and pushes against popo, but not with remarkable strength. Only votes for popo once there's actual confirmation from Norway on a guilty read. Could be genuine town -- could be scum bussing because he has to in order to not be SR'd.Why not vote Truth? Why not vote Nauci?See how easy that is, to just throw "why" in front of some syllables? Do you disagree with who I want to flip? (Because I disagree with you trying to flip someone who hasn't been on any of the end-of-day wagons despite Nauci flipping osuka but not popopo.)
You haven't read most of the game, but you've read enough to say that my posts look like scum posts?In post 1957, Dunnstral wrote:In post 1955, Blair wrote:
I can't quite put my finger on it, but I kind of hate this post.In post 1950, Dunnstral wrote:VOTE: NdMath
I like the look of 1944 from the parts I've skimmed so far and I've been thinking this lurking is his scum meta
I think the last few posts by Truth where he's trying to really sell there being a mason who thinks differently from paints a bad picture; Blair is still alive to get nightkilled so I don't get what he would be thinking if he was town, and he only claimed under pressure today*throws up hands*
I'll be honest, I haven't read most of the game. I like/respect Glitch's wall posts and cases, and I was suspecting NDMath due to having played a scum game with him where he very much lurked it out in the main thread
YouIn post 1960, Dunnstral wrote:I've been asking Looker for more, I brought up Truth's claim not making sense with the way other players were treating them, and I'm not voting NDMatharevoting NDMath. And asking me for what? You say "more", but you have no idea what you're looking for - I think you just want to look busy so that you can demonize what you perceive to be low activity. (Despite not even reading what peoplehaveposted.)
- I'm not penalizing people who flipped popopo before I pursue the people who avoided it.
- I don't know what methods Blair uses to sort - it can't be VCA or she'd be done by now. And I'm not going to manufacture verbose bullshit just to make her happy.
- And obviously Nauci wishes I was the policy vig, because I can see how scummy he looks today. He doesn't even say he thinks I'm scum.
- NDMath
-
NDMath Goon
- NDMath
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 642
- Joined: November 25, 2019
Because of the n3 jk, mafia likely doesn't have any other roleblockers which can act on night 3.
So if there's someone who can protect Blair tonight without roleblocking her they should speak up.
(Blair should not shoot unless she will likely survive the night.)
@Mod
VOTE: DunnstralIn post 1948, Truth wrote:I think Dunnstral is most likely mafia for the way mavsfan attacked po early but then asked about why people were voting po when other people actually started voting him, and he started calling it a policy lynch instead of looking at the actual reasons.
VOTE: Dunnstral
This is L-1.
I don't like any of the posts on this page from Dunnstral, and he is voting me for primarily Inactivity. I also haven't ever found anything from mavs/Dunn townie, unlike everyone else left.
I value voice way more than my vote in most cases. "Mafia can easily hide behind the curtain of withholding their vote to try to stay under the radar." I can't not be voting day 1 without people screaming about it so this point really doesn't stand.In post 1944, Glitch wrote:Spoiler: NDmath and Po
NDmath: Absolutely nothing except null reads, then spiritually joins the wagon when there's no way to oppose a popo elimination.
This particular paragraph has nagged me for a while and I really don't like the use of a vote.
I'm a big believer in wagons and votes. We have 2 tools to use unless given a PR, and those are our voice and our votes. Even if you're not certain, use your vote. You don't have to be certain. It's a tool to form pressure, pressure creates content, and content creates results. Mafia can easily hide behind the curtain of withholding their vote to try to stay under the radar.In post 828, NDMath wrote:I didn't see value in voting at that point in time. I don't get why I can't be not voting in peace when it's still early in the dayphase and I'm not one to case early on. I'm helping just as much without voting in that you got the impression that if I did vote it would be for you and received the same amount of pressure from it, I don't get that point at all.
Additionally, there are lots of random instances that make me raise my eyebrow that pile up. GuiltyLion made a strong case against you in 878 bringing your meta into the game. (And the very next page you have a strong enough SR on GL to vote for him. Shallow.) There's also your legendary 986 self-scum-meta where you prophesy your own playstyle as being scummy. Then there's this:
Pray, do tell, in which of your 18 posts this game have you genuinely scumhunted?In post 1320, NDMath wrote:The thought that I'm not scumhunting this game. Since I didn't bother to pretend to scumhunt in my scum game.
Additionally:
In post 828, NDMath wrote:I'm not understanding the attacks on osuka.In post 908, NDMath wrote:(Posting one at a time to make lion happy.)
I read osuka's iso, I should have done that in the first place.In post 836, Nauci wrote:
What's there to not understand?In post 828, NDMath wrote:I'm not understanding the attacks on osuka.
Osuka's posts comprise of the brief fight with Quick, a lot of posts facepalming at Truth which are mostly meaningless, and a very lazy and unsubstantiated push on me.
I scumreads the way that Osuka talks about my posting as "weird" repeatedly without ever explaining weird how—it's exactly the kind of shallow shade throwing without being able to come up with a proper case/narrative that signifies scum pushes vs town ones, especially at an opportune time when others like CSF were FoSing me.
He has repeatedly tried to misconstrue the way I have tried to explain his meta to the game as buddying, even though I've repeatedly told him and everyone else why I said what I did about him and wasn't at buddying. He's not engaging with my push at all or answering my question.In post 909, NDMath wrote:
I'm getting too much humour out of people making comments on me not voting.In post 860, Nauci wrote: @NDMath you said you were fully caught up, right? Why are you still not voting?
VOTE: GuiltyLion
So let me get this straight. First, you don't understand why people are suspecting osuka. Then you read his ISO. (And what? Now you get it? Or you don't agree?) Then you vote GL immediately after that. (Did you SR him after reading his ISO? Or did you not agree with him being scummy at that point?) And then fast forward you declare intent to hammer osuka. What changed? I saw no content whatsoever in your iso between your 908 comment and your out-of-the-blue intent to hammer. The only thing you mentioned about him is how bewildered and confused you were by his behavior and that it doesn't make sense for either alignment. What was the progression there?In post 1501, NDMath wrote:I have Intent to hammer on osuka.
This doesn't even mention the fact that when popo was finally nailed and the ship was RAPIDLY sinking and he knew it, he last-minute voted for you. Why? Why would he vote for you on a sinking ship? Po got all wrapped up in a trap and played his way poorly all the way through the end. Did he play so poorly to try and keep our suspicions off of you by letting his last vote be placed on you? A sad attempt at a last minute bus?
Let's crack down and stop playing games. Let's get real and deal with the fact that Truth is not smart enough to bus popo an entire game, but NDmath's posts are lacking across the board.
I don't understand how it wouldn't be a double standard to scumread me for finally voting. In 986 I was comparing my scum game to people's interpretation of my play this game.
I tried getting more information from popo to sort his claim. I argued on your scumcase of catscratch. When debating lion I was further evaluating my read on him. I'm curious how you would define, displaying scumhunting?
Light scumread, realized my other scumreads weren't gonna be hung today so I switched over.
I was his best chance of lasting to night? He was also scumreading me earlier so that would look more consistent. Why would popo intentionally play poorly as you're proposing?- Nauci
-
Nauci Mafia Scum
- Nauci
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: October 10, 2017
Hey I am still not fully caught up (IpromiseI will within the next 24 hours) so I'm not ready for it to be L-1 as I head to bed rn, even though I think that Dunnstral was doing the vote behavior and barely-surface level "scumhunting" that his scum game consistently exhibits
Also I have to admit I didn't read the recent wall posts, only the crazy Truth posts
UNVOTE: Dunnstral- Truth
-
Truth Goon
- Truth
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 167
- Joined: June 9, 2020
NDMath, why should a doctor speak up instead of just secretly protecting Blair and making mafia waste a kill? I'm suspicious you want a doctor to reveal so you can kill them in the night.
Dunnstral and Looker would be my guesses for the mafia though. Only because I think Dunnstral is mafia and NDMath is now voting for Dunnstral.Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
- Truth
- Nauci
- NDMath
- Looker
- Nauci
- Deimos27
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Nauci
- Dunnstral
- Glitch
- Blair
- Dunnstral
- Blair
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Blair
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral
- Blair
- Dunnstral
- Dunnstral