Newbie 2016: Snapdragons (Game Over)

ClarkBar · Post Post #650 (ISO) » Wed Jul 08, 2020 1:18 pm

Oh fuck, my womb joke.

ClarkBar · Post Post #651 (ISO) » Wed Jul 08, 2020 1:21 pm

I mean it's not a joke. I'm twelve. No age restrictions here or on Pornhub thankfully.

Porkens · Post Post #652 (ISO) » Wed Jul 08, 2020 1:24 pm

In post 648, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 644, Porkens wrote:Nobody tell him.
I thought there was an age restriction for this site?

There is.

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #653 (ISO) » Wed Jul 08, 2020 1:24 pm

I didn't know you were 12. Sorry if that came across like I was belittling you.

Porkens · Post Post #654 (ISO) » Wed Jul 08, 2020 1:26 pm

Huh, I thought there was. I know the registration page asks for your bday

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #655 (ISO) » Wed Jul 08, 2020 1:27 pm

Okay, this game just got weird. Apologise for any role I played in that. I'm not a creep or pedo or anything.

Porkens · Post Post #656 (ISO) » Wed Jul 08, 2020 1:27 pm

Are you SCUM tho?

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #657 (ISO) » Wed Jul 08, 2020 1:30 pm

In post 656, Porkens wrote:Are you SCUM tho?

Nope, I'm Town this game.

BM is Scum though. His push on me is bad. In what world is LL and I Scum? Like, a fabrication of that caliber doesn't come from Town.

ClarkBar · Post Post #658 (ISO) » Wed Jul 08, 2020 1:32 pm

Out and about and on mobile, but I’m not 12, just joshing around. My original comment that I think Looker was referring to was itself a reference to another previous post.

TheThirteenthJT · Post Post #659 (ISO) » Wed Jul 08, 2020 1:34 pm

In post 657, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 656, Porkens wrote:Are you SCUM tho?
Nope, I'm Town this game.

BM is Scum though. His push on me is bad. In what world is LL and I Scum? Like, a fabrication of that caliber doesn't come from Town.

I will say this. While I don't believe in this scumteam... In a world were mafia wins this game.

And Clark let me rephrase

Would you say it's scummy for someone to have said ignore everything LL did and start at clean slate with Porkens?

ClarkBar · Post Post #660 (ISO) » Wed Jul 08, 2020 2:36 pm

In the case of LL/Porkens I would receive such a suggestion with bewilderment and suspicion. Unless of course that player lays out a really compelling case for town!LL. I mean

really

compelling.

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #661 (ISO) » Wed Jul 08, 2020 2:38 pm

In post 660, ClarkBar wrote:In the case of LL/Porkens I would receive such a suggestion with bewilderment and suspicion. Unless of course that player lays out a really compelling case for town!LL. I mean
really
compelling.

Why would they have to view LL as Town? Why couldn't they see LL as Null and then decide they would prefer to lynch a stronger SR?

TheThirteenthJT · Post Post #662 (ISO) » Wed Jul 08, 2020 2:41 pm

In post 460, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 455, TheThirteenthJT wrote:Hmm what to do with this slot. I don't want to wait for replacement of we aren't going to give them a fair chance. Personally for me I'd say to almost disregard LL plays for whomever replaces in but I know that's not really possible. I want everyone in this wagon to give their opinions on what just happened.
I'm totally open to giving the replace in a fair shake.

What do you think of this Clark?

ClarkBar · Post Post #663 (ISO) » Wed Jul 08, 2020 2:56 pm

I’m on mobile so excuse the lack of quotes and stuff. It’s a pain.

@Quick: A null read is fine, but explain why. Also, give me some reasoning on a stronger execution.

@JT13: That’s fine I guess. Is it a little weird for Quick to move off a wagon they were once on when nothing from that slot shows me that LL’s actions were just from a toxic player? Yeah. But I don’t see Quick giving Porkens a clean slate. A fair shake is different than abandoning a read.

@ Both of you: Do you believe that LL’s action were from frustrated town?

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #664 (ISO) » Wed Jul 08, 2020 3:00 pm

In post 663, ClarkBar wrote:@ Both of you: Do you believe that LL’s action were from frustrated town?

One possible way to read LL's actions is that they left with a final "hurrah". I actually don't like that mindset as they could have just as easily posted what they posted without leaving the game. That's the way I am leaning atm. My read on the play is that they left with their cards on the table, which they only did because they would otherwise just want to keep some things to themselves for other reasons which I have listed already.

TheThirteenthJT · Post Post #665 (ISO) » Wed Jul 08, 2020 3:05 pm

To be honest I don't know the mindset of LL. I did defend their early push and attempted to justify them with townviewpoints for their actions. But they threw a curve ball that makes them almost impossible to read properly for me. We're they just frustrated? I think it's a combination of things but my top reasoning for their actions would be they just didn't care about this specific game. It's the most reasonable conclusion I can come up with.

TheThirteenthJT · Post Post #666 (ISO) » Wed Jul 08, 2020 3:07 pm

And my mindset early game for them was that I didn't think scum would push that hard so early In the game knowing to it had the potential to backfire which it did.

Porkens · Post Post #667 (ISO) » Wed Jul 08, 2020 3:29 pm

tu bi on est

ClarkBar · Post Post #668 (ISO) » Wed Jul 08, 2020 4:47 pm

Ok, I'm a drunky brewster right now and probably shouldn't be posting at all. BUT! I'm brimming with shit to say. I'll get to it tomorrow. A lot of it would just be me quoting Quick and asking questions as a result.

So far I'm not getting some essential things. Including: people on the LL/Porkens wagon not jumping in at all. I'm not asking for this to bolster my own argument, I feel good about that on its own, but the silence is off-putting. Including: An actual argument that I can buy for LL/Pork actually being town. Including: A case for BM being scum.

Goddammit Porkens, you sly fox. You might dismantle your wagon yet, but you don't get all the credit for that. Just know that I know you're scum and I won't let go.

Ok, I'm seeing two screens and I had some really good points running through my head a couple hours ago and I hope those return tomorrow morning.

Porkens · Post Post #669 (ISO) » Wed Jul 08, 2020 4:51 pm

In post 95, LuckyLuciano wrote:
In post 94, Homura wrote:I don't have one. Just think you're reading too much into something that could have a non-game-related reason for occurring.
Thank you for your contribution to the game. Come back when you want to push the game forward.

What a total asshat, Jesus Christ.

ClarkBar · Post Post #670 (ISO) » Wed Jul 08, 2020 4:59 pm

I actually liked that post. It mirrored my feelings exactly. I can be an asshat too I suppose.

ClarkBar · Post Post #671 (ISO) » Wed Jul 08, 2020 5:01 pm

Porkens, I get it. You can't believe the false claim, you couldn't believe your town PM, LL was such a dick etc. Not going for it.

Porkens · Post Post #672 (ISO) » Wed Jul 08, 2020 5:06 pm

Riddle me this: why did 76 vote for bloop?

Porkens · Post Post #673 (ISO) » Wed Jul 08, 2020 5:09 pm

In post 137, 72offsuit wrote:
In post 34, Raya36 wrote:
In post 24, LuckyLuciano wrote:UNVOTE: 72
VOTE: Blopp
Why the change of vote?
Same question for 72
23 - dat smiley face --- bad overly friendly/buddy-buddy vibe.
LAMIST - "Lets move out of RVS" with 0 game-related content

Cause this is trash.

Porkens · Post Post #674 (ISO) » Wed Jul 08, 2020 5:12 pm

In post 163, 72offsuit wrote:
In post 148, Raya36 wrote:
In post 137, 72offsuit wrote:
In post 34, Raya36 wrote:
In post 24, LuckyLuciano wrote:UNVOTE: 72
VOTE: Blopp
Why the change of vote?
Same question for 72
23 - dat smiley face --- bad overly friendly/buddy-buddy vibe.
LAMIST - "Lets move out of RVS" with 0 game-related content
Have your thoughts on Blopp changed at all?
No. Why do you ask?

This after brushing off questions about early page reads