question that isn't intended to be aggressive but I don't think I can word in a non-aggressive wayIn post 374, Umlaut wrote:I would say "do you want to explain that vote, Menalque" but I assume you would have explained it if you wanted to
I just thought it was a way to help me form a read. Thanks for reminding me that I shouldn't be talking about other ongoing voyages. I have forgotten about that.In post 367, Eevee wrote:you shouldn't talk about other ongoing voyages btwIn post 358, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:I would like to point out that since making that post, Chemist1422 has posted 4 times in Micro 953: Treestump Express as of the time I am making this post. (citation)In post 356, Snowblaze wrote:...
Chemist gets slight townpoints for their only response to Fredrick’s accusations being “wat”, I feel like scum would be more likely to take accusations seriously.
...
why have you decided to use cross game activity tells to this extent on today's cruise? i skimmed though your last town expedition and couldn't find you use a single one - do you scumread anyone in this game for their content alone and not those tells?
~Eve
Don't think the below is even remotely related to cross-game activity.In post 370, Chemist1422 wrote:I’m not going to answer fredrick because I’m of the opinion that cross-game activity tells should be against the rules if they aren’t already
In post 361, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:Anyway, I just noticed this post and looked through your ISO, Chemist1422. You have not responded to this question and I am interested in the answer.In post 114, Eevee wrote:Which takes do you referring to? And why do you think mechanic talk is "bold" in any circumstance?In post 60, Chemist1422 wrote:holden's take on the mechanics was towny imo it's a bit bold for scum
~Eva
Feel like Holden has very much disappeared from the game as a presence after having done just enough to seem like town + he’s voting me which is a wagon I would expect a scum to have gotten onIn post 376, Umlaut wrote:Would you explain where that vote is coming from?
In post 380, Menalque wrote:I don’t particularly want to control the game here but people need to stop fucking around on 2 person wagons and get to voting some people up
My candidate is Holden. Get onboard or tell me why I’m wrong
That’s @evwryone
But town is just as likely to go on that wagon.In post 379, Menalque wrote:Feel like Holden has very much disappeared from the game as a presence after having done just enough to seem like town + he’s voting me which is a wagon I would expect a scum to have gotten onIn post 376, Umlaut wrote:Would you explain where that vote is coming from?
I'm not. I am just doing what you asked of everyone, which is to "Get onboard or tell me why I’m wrong".In post 385, Menalque wrote:Fredrick why are you seemingly actively opposed to building a wagon?
You only told me to tell you why you might be wrong, not that he is town.In post 387, Menalque wrote:Okay, only you’re not telling me why Holden is town you’re just resisting the push
But when I clicked on "Activity overview", it says that he is.In post 389, Menalque wrote:And Holden is not VLA?
He has his V/LA flag set on his profile until, um, today. I don't think he stated in thread he was going V/LA.In post 389, Menalque wrote:And Holden is not VLA?
Oh boy are we ready to disappoint you monkeymanIn post 393, Almost50 wrote:I have a sinking feeling that at least half of it is rubbish.
The thought of Umlaut eating an omelette brings me joy.In post 371, Umlaut wrote:I haven't made an omelette in quite a while, but I do have some ham in the fridge so I may have to do that later! Thanks for the suggestion.