But town!LL would do this? What is this argument?In post 696, 72offsuit wrote:LL is not a rage quitter. He is also not a sore loser. I dont see !scumLL replacing out and screwing over his replcement with his fake claim.
Newbie 2016: Snapdragons (Game Over)
Forum rules
- ClarkBar
-
ClarkBar Goon
- ClarkBar
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 879
- Joined: June 16, 2020
- Location: PDX
- Porkens
-
Porkens Jack of All Trades
- Porkens
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9700
- Joined: June 20, 2008
In post 278, LuckyLuciano wrote:If I'm not mistaking, that's 4 votes. I have a TPR. Let's move on.In post 290, LicketyQuickety wrote:Like, if you are mason with 72, just say so. If you are that would make sense. But it's not really my fault I caught 72 lying about your meta and thought he was Scum for it.
Anyways, if you ARE masons with 72, which I would say is about 50/50 at this point, then I would look at Raya36 for the blatant buddy attempt as well as Thirteen for them affirming LL's meta and budying me. I DON'T think Blopp flaking is actually AI.
I don’t understand this progression at allIn post 284, LicketyQuickety wrote:
No, I'm claiming my case is rock solid and you claiming PR doesn't dissuade me at all given that is exactly what you would do if you were Scum. Like, what is my incentive to believe you are telling the truth about being TPR?In post 282, LuckyLuciano wrote:So you are advocating eliminating a claimed power role day 1 when, in claiming, my slot because self-resolving as the game goes on anyway?worse than random- Porkens
-
Porkens Jack of All Trades
- Porkens
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9700
- Joined: June 20, 2008
I’m not at all sure what you are trying to convince me of hereIn post 696, 72offsuit wrote:
Porkens.In post 606, Porkens wrote:It just boggles my mind that LL ended up claiming based on a scumread of three posts.
Read into the relationship between LL and Quick.
LL replaced oit of the previous game he was involved with quick. It was clear to me he was cbf with this game.
LL is not a rage quitter. He is also not a sore loser. I dont see !scumLL replacing out and screwing over his replcement with his fake claim.worse than random- ClarkBar
-
ClarkBar Goon
- ClarkBar
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 879
- Joined: June 16, 2020
- Location: PDX
- 72offsuit
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- 72offsuit
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
Question you need to ask here if porkens is lynched and flips town, did i actively push scummy slots, or did i just rest on my laurels and cry "no, dont lynch LL"In post 605, TheThirteenthJT wrote:
To not be associated with elimnating a member of the town day 1. Thought this was common scum tactics? Plus there was no need with 4 votes and hammering would have been a bad idea.In post 602, Porkens wrote:Why would 72 counterwagon away from LL if they know LL is town?
Again this is all under the assumption LL was town. The only one that really knows the truth is you on that slot. Well LL too.- 72offsuit
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- 72offsuit
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
- Porkens
-
Porkens Jack of All Trades
- Porkens
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9700
- Joined: June 20, 2008
- 72offsuit
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- 72offsuit
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
This feels like a town-motivated push to me.In post 616, TheThirteenthJT wrote:
I'm going through your ISO currently. But a quick summary of what I'm seeing. It is based on your stance of LL/Porkens as well as your stance on replacement players. You defend LL hard and slowly worked your way to turning on them. But you teased a vote multiple times and it wasn't until you realized you weren't the hammer that you finally jumped on the wagon. Basically it comes down that you wanted any reason to join the wagon but we're too afraid to hammer so shied away.In post 611, ClarkBar wrote:In post 607, Battle Mage wrote:I'd take Clark as my buddy to guarantee his first win as scum, and also so you could be right about me and Clark being scum.
to guarantee his first win as scum
to guarantee his first win
his first win
Is it that I was leaning town on LL and now am pushing for the slot to be executed? Do you think my reasoning is weak? I'm happy to talk about this, so if something is troubling you don't be shy.In post 599, TheThirteenthJT wrote:(Again something is off for me with Clark's vote )
In general, if you think that I'm wrong on the Pork slot or that I'm not taking things into account that I should be please let me know. I just really believe pork is the right kill.
I agree with this read.- 72offsuit
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- 72offsuit
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
Agreed. Clark's take on LLs fake claim feels EXTREMELY opportunisticIn post 619, TheThirteenthJT wrote:Post 456 is by far the biggest red flag for me. I feel that up to this point Clark was attempting to slowly turn on LL but this posts felt like such a jump it felt forced. Their attitude towards that slot changed from then on.- Porkens
-
Porkens Jack of All Trades
- Porkens
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9700
- Joined: June 20, 2008
This postIn post 344, ClarkBar wrote:Hi BM!
Again I want to say how sorry I am for letting myself almost get replaced. I was whiny in the beginning of the game about the slow place, and so of course it would be me to then contribute to the problem. I work on weekends, and with the holiday and some other life stuff I got completely wrecked. I do virtually nothing during the week, so my posting will be a lot more consistent.
I'll say this regarding much of what I've read in the last few pages: I am not going to go read a past game to see how players behaved in it. I have said (and still believe) that behavior/activity levels being different in one game to another is something I think is noteworthy and could be AI. So I'm not dismissing that as a reasonable motive to vote for somebody. But, unless something very clear is brought to my attention then I don't think I'm going to hop on a wagon because of meta.
I don't have a problem with LL's reasoning for voting Blopp even if it is kind of a reach. I can follow the reasoning and don't necessarily disagree. I do fear quick hammers, but that fear shouldn't stop a player from having some L-1 pressure. I also buy LL's claim for now. I feel uncomfortable giving town-reads, but LL is a town lean for me.
My vote on Homura stands and I guess we'll see if there is a replacement or if Homura returns. Obviously I can't point any fingers regarding activity levels, but it's the lack of trying to engage other players in a meaningful way that bothers me. Half-heartedly sharing opinions and having only one vote that was in the RVS and not even a random reason given bugs me.
I'll keep looking at stuff and see if I can't get some questions goings. I'm also happy to answer any questions, in fact that might help me in figuring out my own feelings on some things.
Is a very scummy postworse than random- ClarkBar
-
ClarkBar Goon
- ClarkBar
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 879
- Joined: June 16, 2020
- Location: PDX
I've talked about her a lot. Do some reading.In post 706, Porkens wrote:Clark tell me what’s up with reya.- 72offsuit
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- 72offsuit
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
It was a page 1 wagon to get discussion going based off the slightest of bad pings. Why are you harping on about this at this stage of the game?In post 634, Battle Mage wrote:
This wasn't exactly true. 72 had 2 thoughts on the Blopp wagon - one was parroting the logically flawed LAMIST argument from Lucky, and the other was something about not liking a smiley face.In post 449, LuckyLuciano wrote:I'm almost done with my wallpost. The short version is that I know I'm town, so I know that his perspective's matching mine WRT Blopp and Raya means he's likely got a townie starting point with his read to the game. I know that's not useful to you, but I'm also going to advocate you eliminate my slot, at which point you should see that 72o's obvtown.He didn't just sheep me either, he gave independent original thoughts that shared my perspective of the game.
Not clear how Lucky-town implies 72-town, but Lucky-scum making this argument further suggests 72-town (too much association).- Porkens
-
Porkens Jack of All Trades
- Porkens
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9700
- Joined: June 20, 2008
In post 367, TheThirteenthJT wrote:
So you believe LLs claim but he is only a town lean?In post 344, ClarkBar wrote:Hi BM!
Again I want to say how sorry I am for letting myself almost get replaced. I was whiny in the beginning of the game about the slow place, and so of course it would be me to then contribute to the problem. I work on weekends, and with the holiday and some other life stuff I got completely wrecked. I do virtually nothing during the week, so my posting will be a lot more consistent.
I'll say this regarding much of what I've read in the last few pages: I am not going to go read a past game to see how players behaved in it. I have said (and still believe) that behavior/activity levels being different in one game to another is something I think is noteworthy and could be AI. So I'm not dismissing that as a reasonable motive to vote for somebody. But, unless something very clear is brought to my attention then I don't think I'm going to hop on a wagon because of meta.
I don't have a problem with LL's reasoning for voting Blopp even if it is kind of a reach. I can follow the reasoning and don't necessarily disagree. I do fear quick hammers, but that fear shouldn't stop a player from having some L-1 pressure. I also buy LL's claim for now. I feel uncomfortable giving town-reads, but LL is a town lean for me.
My vote on Homura stands and I guess we'll see if there is a replacement or if Homura returns. Obviously I can't point any fingers regarding activity levels, but it's the lack of trying to engage other players in a meaningful way that bothers me. Half-heartedly sharing opinions and having only one vote that was in the RVS and not even a random reason given bugs me.
I'll keep looking at stuff and see if I can't get some questions goings. I'm also happy to answer any questions, in fact that might help me in figuring out my own feelings on some things.
And I agree on your Homura point but it's not strong enough for it to be my leading case. Could you ISo Raya and let me know how you feel about them.
This is a for fun question and part of my experimental ways of playing.(I know we are out of rqs and wifom and not aftual scumhunting blah blah blah. Just let me be me.) If you were town who is your scum team at this point, and if you were mafia who would your partner be? Please answer both sides and just have fun with the answers. I don't have any day to back anything up but I have theories so this will help me improve as a player. Anyone else is free to answer this as well.
This is a good post about a bad post!worse than random- 72offsuit
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- 72offsuit
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
Scummy. Apologises for being scummy.In post 647, ClarkBar wrote:
I hate not being in on a joke.In post 644, Porkens wrote:Nobody tell him.
@FJ13: I'm sorry if it seems I'm contradicting myself. I feel like I'm not, but ok. Why would I say ok to somebody asking to wipe the slate clean? Why would I ignore things that happened in a game simply because there is a different player in the slot?- Porkens
-
Porkens Jack of All Trades
- Porkens
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9700
- Joined: June 20, 2008
That’s not what you said here.In post 26, 72offsuit wrote:
Agreed.In post 25, LuckyLuciano wrote:He's mafia, my vote is no longer random.
VOTE: Bloppworse than random- 72offsuit
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- 72offsuit
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
Yes, he can be an assIn post 669, Porkens wrote:
What a total asshat, Jesus Christ.In post 95, LuckyLuciano wrote:
Thank you for your contribution to the game. Come back when you want to push the game forward.In post 94, Homura wrote:I don't have one. Just think you're reading too much into something that could have a non-game-related reason for occurring.- ClarkBar
-
ClarkBar Goon
- ClarkBar
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 879
- Joined: June 16, 2020
- Location: PDX
- 72offsuit
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- 72offsuit
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
In post 246, 72offsuit wrote:The avatar removal just feels like an account deactivation. Seems like she decided forum mafia wasnt her cup of tea.
Question is, what it due to !scumher having to explain her way out of a hole, or just disliking the game overall.In post 675, ClarkBar wrote:
Ask 72. His reasons seem to be the same as LL's. The exception being that 72 never gave an opinion on the ART. How does that rub you?In post 672, Porkens wrote:Riddle me this: why did 76 vote for bloop?
Why did 72 change his vote? Why did 72 seem to not know where his vote was at that point in the game?- Porkens
-
Porkens Jack of All Trades
- Porkens
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9700
- Joined: June 20, 2008
Quick was this true or was it bullshit?In post 379, LicketyQuickety wrote:LL is also a lot less wordy as Town. I am assuming this pattern holds based on how I would assume LL would play as Scum given prior experience playing with them. This is not strictly a "meta read" but rather a personality trait narrative read. There's a diff but I don't really feel like explaining rn.worse than random- 72offsuit
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- 72offsuit
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
I knew i voted blopp, and i thought i had voted raya when i started scumreading her.In post 675, ClarkBar wrote:
Ask 72. His reasons seem to be the same as LL's. The exception being that 72 never gave an opinion on the ART. How does that rub you?In post 672, Porkens wrote:Riddle me this: why did 76 vote for bloop?
Why did 72 change his vote? Why did 72 seem to not know where his vote was at that point in the game?
Nice shading here though.- ClarkBar
-
ClarkBar Goon
- ClarkBar
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 879
- Joined: June 16, 2020
- Location: PDX
- 72offsuit
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- 72offsuit
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
You jave been confrontational and poked and prodded.In post 693, Porkens wrote:You are townreading me for scumreading someone who townreads him? Am I following that correctly?
It gives me town vibes- 72offsuit
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- 72offsuit
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
I dont see why you are questioning my motivation here.In post 714, Porkens wrote:
That’s not what you said here.In post 26, 72offsuit wrote:
Agreed.In post 25, LuckyLuciano wrote:He's mafia, my vote is no longer random.
VOTE: Blopp
Let me break it down.
1) I get an initial bad ping, from the smiley face and LAMIST post of blopp.
2) I like to wagon newbies, they are the most likely tl give AI reactions
3) I vote blopp to pressure the slot.
What is hard to understand here?- 72offsuit
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- 72offsuit
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
1. Why are you asking me this now and not earlier?In post 720, ClarkBar wrote:My bad 72, you did at one point refer to the ART. Why did it take you so long, especially when players asked you if your opinion/reasonsing for the Blopp wagon had changed, to address it?
2. I had nothing new to add.Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
- 72offsuit
- 72offsuit
- 72offsuit
- ClarkBar
- 72offsuit
- Porkens
- 72offsuit
- ClarkBar
- 72offsuit
- Porkens
- 72offsuit
- Porkens
- 72offsuit
- ClarkBar
- Porkens
- 72offsuit
- 72offsuit
- Porkens
- 72offsuit
- 72offsuit
- ClarkBar
- Porkens
- Porkens
- ClarkBar