His first 2 posts aren't alignment indicative. (Working in chronological order)
In post 474, Looker wrote:
Hey, Raya. Fuck LuckyLuciano. I'm pretty sure he's just faking his outrage because he has no other tools in his skillset as scum.
Him faking a PR was weak.
- Currently, flip preferences are: 36% LuckyLuciano or Battle Mage | 26% 72offsuit, JamSV, or ThirteenthJT | 16% LicketyQuickety | 12% ClarkBar | 10% Raya.
VOTE: LuckyLuciano
The bold part I just find interesting, based off of a certain someone insinuating I'm not very friendly.
Now, keep an eye on the %s of 2 people in particular, BattleMage's, and ClarkBar's.
In post 534, Looker wrote: In post 475, ClarkBar wrote:@Looker: Would I be correct in guessing that your flip percentage preference does not necessarily correlate to town v scum reads?
For the most part they do, but I try to focus more on votecount than tone because I feel it's easy for people to fake and bullshit. Typically who people vote off is significant enough to them to be genuine.
773 debunks the fact that it isn't solely based off of votecount, especially considering ClarkBar's 0%.
In post 746, Looker wrote:
Flip preferences: 29% Porkens | 20% JamSV | 16% Raya | 14% ThirteenthJT or LicketyQuick | 12% Battle Mage | 9% 72offsuit | 0% ClarkBar
Reminder I said to keep an eye on BattleMage's and ClarkBar's %s. 36 -> 12, and 12 -> 0. Unfortunately, I was planning on bringing up to 12% -> 0% for ClarkBar, once he actually bothered to explain his %s. He never did. He explained why he scum read me and Raya, sure, alright, I don't quite recall asking for them 2 in particular though, oddly, I recall asking for ClarkBar's and 72's explanations considering 0% and 9% respectively, and them being the lowest.
In post 751, Looker wrote:My
percentages are based off who I think are most likely to flip scum based on who they've tried to flip and who's tried to flip them. Clark is at 0 because he's basic and there's no interaction to influence me to flip him. Especially at the time of that post. I
am
a replacement, though, so, if I've missed something, let me know.
Right, okay, that makes sense... Wait... Am I reading that correctly? Hmm... Clark is at 0 because he's basic and there's no interaction to influence you to flip him. I may be remembering this incorrectly so I do apologise. For your initial %s to be at 12% for ClarkBar, and not 0. That means initially, he wasn't basic enough, and had too many interactions to influence you to flip him? Wait... That can't be right... There's no logic there surely? I must be missing something...
Looker is scum.
(Quote broke and idk how to fix it)
="In
post 968, Looker"]
Your assumptions are confusing me. I also think it's weird that you went from "I don't understand what Looker means" to "Looker is being purposefully 'nonsensical'" without any input from me.
JamSV/Raya
- Flip preferences: 24% JamSV | 22% Raya | 19% Battle Mage | 18% ThirteenthJT | 9% ClarkBar | 8% 72offsuit
- Jams's imgur post shows he voteparked a town slot and has avoided suspicion all game.
- I think it's interesting that this is a newbie game, but there are like no newbies.
- That was kind of a low blow - "His reads don't tend to be particularly accurate in general". My reads are as accurate as anybody else's.
VOTE: JamSV[/quote]
Just want to note while its there. People change their minds and can interpret things differently after reading stuff additional times. I'll give you the fact that accidentally voting town, does slightly increase scum %. As to whether all %s are increased by the same amount, would be important to explain. Vote parking isn't a valid excuse however, scum would be opportunistic.
In post 1005, Looker wrote: In post 996, JamSV wrote:991
Long Story Short
Many people have also brought up the lack of sustenance your % stuff has. It's not just me, I'm the one pushing for you to explain in depth. Once again, you were incapable of explaining any read or percentage Looker.
What people, and I think you mean substance. What part of my explanation did you not like? "Incapable"? Are you a troll account?
Firstly, there's a saying. Don't give what you can't receive. I did mean substance. Still want an explanation as to how the %s changed. You've said its due to the Porken's flip. How much was due to it? What about other factors? Etc Etc. No explanation.
How does one go from "I feel you're making a mistake about Jam", to voting Raya. You went from being basically certain I was scum, to being unsure with "I feel" (GCSE English Language Analysis yw). Town wouldn't join a wagon like that.
In post 1102, Looker wrote:- Clark calling me "hostile" is a bit exaggerative.
- What's "ART"?
- Bearing on nothing? How can my response to someone not have any bearing on the topic? These approaches are confusing me.
- It made no sense to flip Raya yesterday when my suspects were Porkens and JamSV.
Nothing particularly to add there. It's just comes down to you stating me and Raya are scum. Notice, you've barely tried to convince anybody at this point, you've only defended yourself. Surely town would have at least attempted to convince others before jumping opportunistically to Raya?
In post 1155, Looker wrote:
I honestly did it that last time because i thought you were being rude. I explained why I suspected you and Raya earlier, but, since Dunnstral's replaced in, I'll go further. The fact that no one's voted you at all and you were on a townflip increases your likelihood for being scum. I don't see why Porkens's wagon wouldn't be the first place to look, especially with him and LQ flipping town. Clark is claiming Cop and an innocent on Thirteenth, so his slot should be self-resolving. 72offsuit didn't eliminate town. Raya/Dunnstral pushed Echo/LQ and Porkens, both who flipped town. Blopp/Battle Mage could be scum as well.
In post 1132, JamSV wrote:I've looked over your games, all you do is post single sentences with little impact to fly under the radar, regardless of alignment.
Are these things not hurtful to you people?
- Is Clark accusing me of being a bad SE? You guys killed the SE's, and the one you have left you're arguing with over playstyle.
- Also, I'm posting as much as I can in this game that I play to relax. I have an actual job, though, and actual loved ones, so snark doesn't compel me to "try harder" regardless of whether you think I'm scum or not. I
do
try my best, though, which is why insulting people's intelligence and literacy isn't impressive to me.
- I'll stop being so sensitive.
Ask away.
Playing to win turned to playing to relax once someone starts to pressure you, I see. You didn't go in further you just said it again. Randomly went from certain about me and Raya to lightly suspecting BattleMage. Doesn't quite make sense, but I'll just assume you're being a bit nice to Dunnstral for "replacing into scum", and giving him the benefit of the doubt. Still doesn't make sense to be so sure of me and Raya, to then claim BattleMage could be scum. Subtle distancing. "Fuck you LuckyLuciano" I recall you saying.
In post 1203, Looker wrote: In post 1191, JamSV wrote:The issue when its 3v2 of voting at all, is it actually allows potential for both scum partners to hop on and quick hammer. So I don't know how to take what 72 just did.
In post 1192, JamSV wrote:AKA. Did 72 just hit a scum slot as town or is 72 scum? It isn't town hitting town as scum would win.
I think it means that Battle Mage is scum. It's interesting that you'd still vote for me, though.
In post 1194, TheThirteenthJT wrote:Mas claim time. I am the town doctor. I was bout to warn you guys not to close out the day because I would w unavailable to send in a night action until today. I'll respond after work
That's not very believable. Why wouldn't you just ask for an extension? Who all did you protect?
- I should've stuck to my guns yesterday and stayed on JamSV. Pending ThirteenthJT's response, I'm thinking BM + JamSV. That would explain BM trying to take up for my playstyle yesterday.
VOTE: Battle Mage
Just a really obvious attempt at distancing.
