Are we agreeing it's Looker + BM then? I truly feel much safer about the Looker vote compared to a BM vote. 100% certainty beats anything less than 100%.In post 1249, 72offsuit wrote:That's it. End of my case. Please consider all my recent posts. G'nite.
Newbie 2016: Snapdragons (Game Over)
Forum rules
- JamSV
-
JamSV Goon
- JamSV
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 621
- Joined: June 17, 2020
- Location: England
- 72offsuit
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- 72offsuit
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
?In post 1250, JamSV wrote:
Are we agreeing it's Looker + BM then? I truly feel much safer about the Looker vote compared to a BM vote. 100% certainty beats anything less than 100%.In post 1249, 72offsuit wrote:That's it. End of my case. Please consider all my recent posts. G'nite.
I know BM is scum.
I think you are town.
I think looker is scum.
Why would i vote for looker over BM?
Unless TTJT wants to kick between the harder looker/jam pair, im kicking BM.- 72offsuit
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- 72offsuit
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
Prove to me you are town and vote for BM.In post 1250, JamSV wrote:
Are we agreeing it's Looker + BM then? I truly feel much safer about the Looker vote compared to a BM vote. 100% certainty beats anything less than 100%.In post 1249, 72offsuit wrote:That's it. End of my case. Please consider all my recent posts. G'nite.- 72offsuit
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- 72offsuit
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
- 72offsuit
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- 72offsuit
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
- 72offsuit
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- 72offsuit
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
- 72offsuit
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- 72offsuit
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
- 72offsuit
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- 72offsuit
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
Actually how would the game be over if it was me + jam?
- 72offsuit
-
72offsuit Mafia Scum
- 72offsuit
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: December 28, 2019
- Location: Land Down Under... Where women glow and men thunder
- JamSV
-
JamSV Goon
- JamSV
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 621
- Joined: June 17, 2020
- Location: England
I'd like to second this. I didn't even notice I did it until BM pointed it out.In post 1258, 72offsuit wrote:@ Mod
Can we please clarify jams post?
My read is that was a really obvious formatting error and he did NOT self vote.- JamSV
-
JamSV Goon
- JamSV
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 621
- Joined: June 17, 2020
- Location: England
I certainly trust TTJT's reads as he's conftown. However, as you said, I know Looker is scum. I can't say the same for you or BM, so of course I'd much prefer a Looker hammer.In post 1251, 72offsuit wrote:
?In post 1250, JamSV wrote:
Are we agreeing it's Looker + BM then? I truly feel much safer about the Looker vote compared to a BM vote. 100% certainty beats anything less than 100%.In post 1249, 72offsuit wrote:That's it. End of my case. Please consider all my recent posts. G'nite.
I know BM is scum.
I think you are town.
I think looker is scum.
Why would i vote for looker over BM?
Unless TTJT wants to kick between the harder looker/jam pair, im kicking BM.- Nahdia
-
Nahdia They/ThemScheherazade
- Nahdia
They/Them- Scheherazade
- Scheherazade
- Posts: 10626
- Joined: February 14, 2016
- Pronoun: They/Them
72offsuit wrote:@ Mod
Can we please clarify jams post?
My read is that was a really obvious formatting error and he did NOT self vote.This probably should be in my rules going forward, but I'll clarify it here.
I do not count votes that are inside broken quote tags or otherwise blatantly not intentional.we're all made of stories | remember to take your b12 | sign up for a GTKAS thread! (request access here)
"I’m going to harness love for epidemiological purposes."-Zaphkael, 2020- JamSV
-
JamSV Goon
- JamSV
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 621
- Joined: June 17, 2020
- Location: England
- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
I think it's probably debatable. He didn't mean to self-vote, so it would be harsh to count it. But the Mod would have to be impartial and count votes as they fall. Making a subjective judgement about what a player intended, where it relates to win/loss would be setting a problematic precedent. I'm sure when I've seen this situation come up before, the vote counted.In post 1237, TheThirteenthJT wrote:Eh would that elimantion actually have gone through?
However, in a sense it doesn'treallymatter what the Mod's judgement would be. What matters is, despite the possible ambiguity, if I was scum with either 72o or Looker, I'd 100% have gone with it and taken a controversial/debatable win given the seemingly unanimous verdict I'm scum (which as noted, should have rung some alarm bells anyway if you thought I could be scum in this spot).Show2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
If you were to rule out me and Jam that would be immensely helpful, because it brings you down to the same possible solves as me. I'm currently thinking votes today will ultimately tell us who 72's partner is without me having to go back and do too much reading. Scum presumably NK you tonight, so would be good to get as much insight from you before lynching, assuming we even make it to tomorrow...In post 1238, TheThirteenthJT wrote:@looker what made you doubt my claim btw? It's just weird.
So I want to give my scumrankings as to were my mind is. I am also doing ISo reads in will be for the next couple days so don't expect my vote anytime soon.
Scum
72- for reasons continuing from day 2. I had you as confirmed scum. Only doubt I have on you right now is my own personal selfsoubt.
BM- I know you and 72 can't be a team but I see you as the second scummiest player here. I looked over your ISO and you barely looked at Looker meanwhile interacted with Jamsv all game. You and Jamsv I want to rule out but at the same time the bussing each other side a big possibility.
Jamsv I've described your play as weird and to me very bold for scum. You made yourself a target day one and for no reason. Thought you would have been a PR and we're trying to save yourself after almost being universally town read
Looker is my weakest read. I have not liked their vote progressions at all throughout the game especially that Raya/duns vote. At the end I feel like I have the least content from them to analyze.
I'm basically done for tonight.
In terms of my approach towards Looker, it isn't hugely relevant now, but you can look at any of my other games with him, and I've done the exact same thing. It's a policy move, rather than specific to this game. Open 784 just finished and would be a good example. Dunnstral did say the same thing too, and flipped town.
Your top scumread is scum anyway, so that's a good start!Show2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
This is particularly ridiculous. Of course it makes total sense for you to do that as scum - you 'open-wolfed' with your hammer yesterday and realised you would be on the backfoot today regardless, so you came out firing at me in the hope of capitalising on the suspicion around me from Day 2. No downside for you as scum, only upside as it gives you a bit of momentum as 'first-mover'. So sensible strategy on your part, but painstakingly obviously scum. No reason for 72o-town to potentially throw the game like that without discussion when you have given no good reason to vote for me, and didn't even bother to try and persuade anyone to follow you.In post 1243, 72offsuit wrote:In post 1200, JamSV wrote:There's something important to note. At the moment, TTJT is conf town. Unless if Looker wants to pop up and counter claim. Taking this into account, there are some things to realise. There are 6 scum teams in a vacuum.
72offsuit + BattleMage
72offsuit + JamSV
72offsuit + Looker
BattleMage + JamSV
BattleMage + Looker
JamSV + Looker
There are a handful we can eliminate with logic.
JamSV + Looker isn't the scum team. We could have swooped in on 72offsuit's vote on BattleMage, or BattleMage's vote on 72offsuit and won the game, by both of us voting for the same person, taking it to 3 votes, then winning by having an equivalent number of town + scum. This didn't happen, so we can rule out that potential scum team. Similarly, 72offsuit + BattleMage aren't the scum team. They would have hammered Looker after I voted for him, unless if they haven't gotten around to it yet, but I'm more of an optimistic person. That strikes off another potential scum team.
This means, no matter what, one of 72/BM are scum, and me or Looker are scum. As such. I'm willing to go down the lines of Looker himself:
Hammer priorities:- Looker - 100%
- 72offsuit - 0%
- BattleMage - 0%
- TTJT - negative 100%
For what its worth, the likelihood is, Battle Mage is the partner, however I'll wait for TTJT to weigh in as to whether I'm correct or not before D3 occurs.
Finally, the last thing I'm going to say for a little while.
GG. Town wins.
!scumMe leading with a vote makes ZERO sense. !ScumMe proveds town with FREE INFO. It is a literally ----- EV play with a clear.
I'm town, it should be painstakingly obvious.Show2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
Hold on...you're denying 72-Jam is a possibility? Hmm...
Show2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
1. I did deny it, several times I think.In post 1241, 72offsuit wrote:
I haven't given any reason. Laughable.In post 1197, Battle Mage wrote:In post 1191, JamSV wrote:The issue when its 3v2 of voting at all, is it actually allows potential for both scum partners to hop on and quick hammer. So I don't know how to take what 72 just did.
I don't have lots of time tonight. 72o pulled a similar move on me in our only other game which went to LyLo (where we were both town and subsequently lost), so it's not completely certain he's scum. That being said, he hasn't actually given any reason for voting me, so I don't think there's any prospect of persuading him otherwise, and it makes my decision a no-brainer!In post 1192, JamSV wrote:AKA. Did 72 just hit a scum slot as town or is 72 scum? It isn't town hitting town as scum would win.
VOTE: 72offsuit
I think it's highly likely he's scum anyway given the quickhammer on Dunnstral yesterday before I had a chance to check my meta on him, which also prevented TTJT (who is now 100% conftown) from protecting the cop. And the early vote on me, also without discussion, which would throw the game for himself if he was town.
Hard to see why 72o-town would suddenly not care about analysis/discussion, when previously he has been very thoughtful and detailed in his efforts - easily the most I've ever seen him try. Which is NAI in itself, but the lack of consistency seems more like scum who has open-wolfed and taken one for the team, as opposed to town who spontaneously decided they don't care anymore. And #1189?
It then becomes a question of whether it's 72o-Looker or 72o-Jam. Would welcome TTJT's thoughts on that in particular.
You logging in and then logging out and loggin back in as hidden status is obvscum.
Its a lame mechanical tell, but is pretty much 100%. He didn;t even deny it.
2. Because it clearly wasn't true, as we discussed at the time.
3. And it also makes no sense to accuse me of lurking/hiding my activity when I was literally actively posting that same minute.
4. Also, even in some fantasy world where I actually had done this, it would be NAI for this game, given I was in about 6 games at that point, and on your theory could have been hiding my presence for any of them.
5. Although as noted, I've never hidden my online/offline status.
Unfortunately for you, your claim that I was hiding my activity so I could avoid posting, 30 seconds before I posted a long and detailed post, is demonstrably false. The fact you're clinging to it as the sole reason for voting for me, is pretty transparent.
Question:After doing a very detailed analysis of my posts earlier in the game, which highlighted plenty of reasons to suspect I'm town and few to assume I'm scum, would 72o-town vote for me in LyLo for the above reason, without any discussion?Show2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
No more horrible than your pleading below?In post 1245, 72offsuit wrote:
Horrible Appeal to Emotion here.In post 1227, Battle Mage wrote:
dude i'm town, it's 72-Looker or 72-Jam. either is possible, and it's flippin obvious it's 72o over me. Look at howIn post 1221, TheThirteenthJT wrote:This game comes down to 72 and Looker or BM with either looker and jams. I have to do a reread and I'll figure it out. Should have eliminated me last night over Clark in all honesty.Looker and Jam are saying it's me over 72 - one of them is definitely scum and lynches me for the win. Mason-swear.both
I know it's a tough spot dude, but if you read what I've said carefully you will see it.
In post 1242, 72offsuit wrote:
No town player ever says this.In post 1198, Battle Mage wrote:
72o-scum for reasons above, plus his paranoia about me suspecting him yesterday when I didn't, and failure to provide an argument for voting me (despite being cogniscent of all the reasons I'm town), beyond a proven-false claim about me lurking.In post 1196, JamSV wrote:I'll be courteous though and let them respond and try to persuade me otherwise.
Also voting patterns indicate 72o-scum more than BM-scum.Day 1 final wagon was pretty much unanimous, and so 72o didn't need to be on it to get the mislynch. Yesterday wagon was definitely not unanimous and harder for scum to fashion a mislynch, and 72o was on it and hammered before discussion could finish, and despite very clearly trying to set me up as the other mislynch required for scum-win. He only quick-hammered when momentum against me had diminished.
Think about it. for 2 seconds..PleaseShow2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%- TheThirteenthJT
-
TheThirteenthJT Goon
- TheThirteenthJT
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 366
- Joined: May 25, 2020
I came to a conclusion last night. I'm almost sure now.
This is my first Elo situation so I I hope I don't mess it up. I'll put a final case and see what everyone thinks before voting when I'm fully free tonight. At this point I feel 90% sure of one scum. I'm willing to take the chances on it and bet the game. If we lose I'll gladly take the loss.
Everyone final scum pairings you'll bet the game on?- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
In post 1246, 72offsuit wrote:TTJT, consider my leading with a vote, with a clear in play.
The only way this makes sense is if you think I am a super gambit-y player.
I have like 10 games on here.
Look through them, and show me a game where I bus my scum partner or fake-claim as scum, or fake-claim as town.
This is desperate stuffIn post 1247, 72offsuit wrote:TTJT, just read BM;s progression on my slot.
Consider if you think his progression on my slot is natural or forced.
I think you will see that it is in fact, not natural, because he is scum.
I think your argument is self-defeating because you haven't done any of those things here? You haven't fakeclaimed, as you haven't claimed? (although there's no leeway in this now, so not relevant). And you haven't bussed a scumpartner? - your 2 main suspects yesterday were Dunnstral and me, both of whom are town.
There's nothing "super-gambity" about leading with your vote here, it's just obv-scum because 72o-town wouldn't risk throwing the game with no reason, especially with a conf-town to work with. You're a better player than that, and you've played more thoughtfully this game than I've seen before as either town or scum, which is to your credit.
It's only late in Day 2 with your bogus case on me that things really fell apart and you dropped the pretense of scumhunting.
If my progression on your slot was "not natural", you could try to show this? Just making the assertion is lazy scumplay. It's a bit like quoting something and saying "Look BM claimed scum here" when clearly I didn't (see Post 1244).Show2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
This looks like a slip which strongly confirms it as 72o-Jam. No reason why Jam would make this post when he knows I'm town, and 72o is scum.In post 1250, JamSV wrote:
Are we agreeing it's Looker + BM then? I truly feel much safer about the Looker vote compared to a BM vote. 100% certainty beats anything less than 100%.In post 1249, 72offsuit wrote:That's it. End of my case. Please consider all my recent posts. G'nite.Show2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
When I questionned this, you accused me of "claiming scum". How does this stack up against that?
Show2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%- JamSV
-
JamSV Goon
- JamSV
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 621
- Joined: June 17, 2020
- Location: England
BM + Looker.In post 1269, TheThirteenthJT wrote:I came to a conclusion last night. I'm almost sure now.
This is my first Elo situation so I I hope I don't mess it up. I'll put a final case and see what everyone thinks before voting when I'm fully free tonight. At this point I feel 90% sure of one scum. I'm willing to take the chances on it and bet the game. If we lose I'll gladly take the loss.
Everyone final scum pairings you'll bet the game on?- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Battle Mage
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
In post 1258, 72offsuit wrote:@ Mod
Can we please clarify jams post?
My read is that was a really obvious formatting error and he did NOT self vote.
Belated request from Jam here? As noted, Mod clarification helpful but not hugely relevant - just an attempt to put me artificially back in the frame here.In post 1259, JamSV wrote:
I'd like to second this. I didn't even notice I did it until BM pointed it out.In post 1258, 72offsuit wrote:@ Mod
Can we please clarify jams post?
My read is that was a really obvious formatting error and he did NOT self vote.
I.e. Jam knows I'm town and is paving the way to jump on my wagon to build momentum and put pressure on TTJT/Looker to hammer me.In post 1262, JamSV wrote:If TTJT also comes to the conclusion BM is scum. I'll vote him then 72.Show2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55% - Battle Mage
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
- JamSV
- Battle Mage
- Battle Mage
- Battle Mage
- TheThirteenthJT
- Battle Mage
- Battle Mage
- Battle Mage
- Battle Mage
- Battle Mage
- Battle Mage
- JamSV
- Nahdia
- JamSV
- JamSV
- 72offsuit
- 72offsuit
- 72offsuit
- 72offsuit
- 72offsuit
- 72offsuit
- 72offsuit
- 72offsuit
- JamSV