Mini Theme 2155: SIN: This Impurity must be Cleansed!

[BananaCucho]

I guess redteas last post is kinda annoying. There was a lot more to that post he quoted than the one line he made the ":/" face to

But he's made like 2 posts so

[BananaCucho]

They've*

[Starbuck]

Whoa, I had a busy evening and workday today. Catching up shortly.

[Jackel98]

Was Radical Rat's religious "roleplaying" really so out of character that two (three if counting D&D) people saw it as a flavour crumb, let alone one obvious enough to just out to everyone? Like, I'll trust you guys if that's the case, but I thought the point of crumbs was to leave subtle clues to point at later, and that pointing them out would be kind of against that.

I don't know how to read androgybee's fakeclaim, if it's AI at all. I guess it could be a way to see if a PR would out themselves, but that's a stretch tbh. Like, gutwise, trolling/muddying the water seems anti-town, since we'd be operating on false assumptions about how corruption works until they either out themselves or get eliminated, but I can't find scum motivation beyond just misinformation.

Joey_, why did you immediately believe their claim, yet you questioned D&D on why they thought SS was voting androgybee for trolling? You did say overthinking is your brand.

[catboi]

Hm, this game has so few pages i keep confusing it for a lackluster scum PT. Post more guys!

What, keep clicking the wrong topic?

VOTE: NorwegianboyEE

Searching for a replacement for Prism

(╥︣﹏᷅╥᷅)

[NorwegianboyEE]

[Joey_]

Joey_, why did you immediately believe their claim, yet you questioned D&D on why they thought SS was voting androgybee for trolling? You did say overthinking is your brand.

My first post

Post restriction was implied in the mod post so I am inclined to take it as cash

I guess reading isn't your brand

[Dunnstral]

Porkens replaces Prism

[NorwegianboyEE]

YES! Now we can fire up the grill and fry us some pulled pork sandwiches!

[BananaCucho]

Mmmm pork

VOTE: Porky

[Porkens]

YES! Now we can fire up the grill and fry us some pulled pork sandwiches!

SUP

[Jackel98]

Joey_, why did you immediately believe their claim, yet you questioned D&D on why they thought SS was voting androgybee for trolling? You did say overthinking is your brand.

My first post

Post restriction was implied in the mod post so I am inclined to take it as cash

I guess reading isn't your brand

It's not that I can't read, but comprehension isn't a strong suit of mine, apparently. Specifically, I can't comprehend how that answers the question. You take their claim at face value, no questions asked, because the mod colours the word, but you do question D&D how they could have read "VOTE: , [statement]" as the statement being reasoning for the vote.

[Joey_]

Joey_, why did you immediately believe their claim, yet you questioned D&D on why they thought SS was voting androgybee for trolling? You did say overthinking is your brand.

My first post

Post restriction was implied in the mod post so I am inclined to take it as cash

I guess reading isn't your brand

It's not that I can't read, but comprehension isn't a strong suit of mine, apparently. Specifically, I can't comprehend how that answers the question. You take their claim at face value, no questions asked, because the mod colours the word, but you do question D&D how they could have read "VOTE: , [statement]" as the statement being reasoning for the vote.

Hm no, the mod heavily implied at post restriction beyond just “mod colour the name”

And those two things are unrelated. I can never make sure what is andreogeny’s pm, so somewhere I need to make an informed leap of faith to either take it or reject it. Me questionning the troll comment is about thought process and scumhunting where everything is on the table for me to poke at

[Joey_]

I understand that you are uneasy with the apparent incoherence between taking the claim easily while pushing on an “innocent” comment. But I assure you, there ‘s isn’t any incoherence

[Joey_]

If you want another explanation; you can either accept or deny objective infos (claim) but trying to understand motivations behind a post a the thought process is much more complex than a yes/no question and it is where i tend to overthink stuff

[Jackel98]

Do you mean the "exclamation marks are encouraged/required in sinful moderation"? I was curious about that, tbh.
@SS What exactly did you ask the mod about? Like, bee's claim specifically or post restrictions in general?

Also, the two are pretty related imo. At least considering that I have no experience with you and you yourself say that you overthink, it just seems odd.

PEDIT after last two messages:
I guess I'll have to disagree with you on the difference between the two posts' objectivity and complexity. Just because one post is a claim doesn't make it devoid of any thought process or agenda. If anything, a claim would require more forethought (especially considering they're a hydra), and a claim would certainly try to be more persuasive than a question about a post's meaning. Like, the response to the two seems backwards to me, which is where my uneasiness lies.

[Porkens]

I’ll make a ketchup post after grocery shopping dinner etc

[Something_Smart]

@SS What exactly did you ask the mod about? Like, bee's claim specifically or post restrictions in general?

I asked about post restrictions applying to a player without their knowledge.

[Radical Rat]

Welcome Porkens!

[Radical Rat]

How am I gonna get to ever vote now ;_;

You might not have a vote, but if you got a good scumread on a player yet, maybe i’ll consider voting in your name.

I don't like this post. Just seems like a way to duck responsibility for your own voting. Misclown on someone? "Oh well that wasn't MY vote, that was Banana!"

[Joey_]

@alligator It’s pretty easy to understand; a question needs context, intent and is an interaction. A harsclaim negative utility page 1 has no context, no interactions etc regardless of the post themselves. It’s annoying when people uses your words to make a case then disregards your other words because it doesn’t validates their prior idea/read w/e

I know myself better than you do so arguing how/when/how I should overthink and how/when/how I shouldn’t is pointless

[BananaCucho]

How am I gonna get to ever vote now ;_;

You might not have a vote, but if you got a good scumread on a player yet, maybe i’ll consider voting in your name.

I don't like this post. Just seems like a way to duck responsibility for your own voting. Misclown on someone? "Oh well that wasn't MY vote, that was Banana!"

I took it more as buddying than as shirking responsibility tbh

[NorwegianboyEE]

How am I gonna get to ever vote now ;_;

You might not have a vote, but if you got a good scumread on a player yet, maybe i’ll consider voting in your name.

I don't like this post. Just seems like a way to duck responsibility for your own voting. Misclown on someone? "Oh well that wasn't MY vote, that was Banana!"

How dare you, i am the embodiment of purity. No sinful lies are hidden in my motivations. For i only wished to console the treestump in any way possible.

[BananaCucho]

I am consoled

[Porkens]

This is a hard claim.

Everyone in this game has the following post restriction,

Corruption

must be said using the following code. Otherwise we will automatically lower your corruption level at night. Please do not make me hurt you I would be very sad if I did.

Code: Select all

 [color=#8080BF][b]Corruption[/b][/color]

~Bee

So the fakeclaim was that if we don’t format corruption in that way, our corruption level goes VOTE: down and RR was

avoiding

that. And that is townread why? Because some roles “might” use corruption differently, even tho those are “likely scum”?

I must be missing something