I'll brew whatever I want, we limmed scum, this is how I feel right now:In post 717, ItalianoVD wrote:As a matter of fact I don’t like the doubt that you seem to be brewing.
In post 510, SJReaver wrote:
I'll brew whatever I want, we limmed scum, this is how I feel right now:In post 717, ItalianoVD wrote:As a matter of fact I don’t like the doubt that you seem to be brewing.
In post 510, SJReaver wrote:
I'm not speaking for T-Bone, but SJReaver was the correct kill imo. If someone is lock town like SJReaver was, then they're the correct kill.In post 726, shellyc wrote:Hello, hello here we go. Salutations to another day. Also YESSS, we got the scum yesterday!
T-Bone, are you saying because of the "correct" kill made, an SE is more likely to be scum? (i dont know what correct means)
I feel like Italiano is pretty much locked town here. His posts are coming from a townie mindset in my opinion, and he was TR by SJR.
Red in 713, you put it like Porkens is the only guy that needs to scumhunt. This isn't true, it's our shared objective.
At the start of the game I TR Porkens, because I tend to see aggressive people as town.
But after a bit of reading, I feel like aggressive =/= town, and scum can feign it.
I think Porkens might be a good lynch today, but i'd like to see his defense.
723 is my lynchpoolIn post 728, shellyc wrote:Also you TR T-Bone in post 701 but put him in lynchpool in post 723. That's contradictory.
I'm not trying to be mean or disparaging with what I have to say:In post 733, T-Bone wrote:Red, why didn't you even consider GeniusGamer to be the correct kill when you spoke of it in #727?
Is stating the correct NK townie? I think thats NAI in my opinionIn post 735, T-Bone wrote:You're too good, and that's why I've narrowed it down to two.
are you... pocketing me???? (am I using that word right?)In post 735, T-Bone wrote:You're too good, and that's why I've narrowed it down to two.
You townslipped when you asked why SJR was the "correct" killIn post 736, shellyc wrote:Hmmm. Where do you consider me to have "townslipped"? I don't know what you mean. But it's nice to see you reading me as townie.
I haven't rolled scum in forum mafia/werewolf yet, but IRL in the Resistance/SH etc I talk a lot and don't shut up when I'm the on the good guys, and I stay pretty quiet and laid back when I'm one of the bad guys. I'm starting to find my playstyle here online and it's a combination of stream of conscienceless and big analytical posts. Not sure if I could pull this off if I were scum.In post 738, T-Bone wrote:No, I'm saying that if it isn't Porkens as the last scum, it's because it is Redados.
PoE, NKA, how his posts are NAIIn post 740, MiniMegabyte wrote:I do want to ask the question as to why a lot of people are scum reading Porkens?
lmaoIn post 743, Porkens wrote: —MiccWord and T-Bone—
Votes micc
Calls micc scummy
Calls micc scummy again
Calls micc scummy again
I'll elaborate on this for you, Mini.In post 742, shellyc wrote:PoE, NKA, how his posts are NAIIn post 740, MiniMegabyte wrote:I do want to ask the question as to why a lot of people are scum reading Porkens?
Please post a reads list, more information is good!In post 746, MiniMegabyte wrote:744 Okay that’s understandable I did get on and see that word321 was being voted but I didn’t vote as when I got on they were at E-1 and no claim had been made from them. When I got the time to jump back on site they had been eliminated and it was night time so if you like I can post my reads since the confirmation of the two masons and the elimination of word321
Might change porkens to purple zone after that postIn post 728, shellyc wrote:I like Red a lot here. He's not in my lynchpool. He has posted a few long posts analysing various aspects. I feel like scum wouldn't have the motivation to do this.
Porkens, Mini, possibly T-Bone? would be my lynches.
Also you TR T-Bone in post 701 but put him in lynchpool in post 723. That's contradictory.
My reads: (in order from town -> scum)
GeniusGamer
ItalianoVD
Redados
T-Bone
MiniMegabyte
Porkens