In post 338, skitter30 wrote:i'm kinda confused, i'm not sure what there is to like about that question ?
also you feel a bit like pyp to me rn
and it's not that i think the read was made up, per se, but it felt kinda like ~overexplained~ like you needed to show that you were Thinking about things
also i came to the same conclusion as you wrt tw and dk so i'm not sure i'm approaching it from a different angle either?
It just felt like quite an incisive question aimed at whether I was bullshitting instead of provoking an answer that could be ‘used’ by you or to receive an answer that would fit a narrative. The fact I had to think about how to express my feelings on that made me realise it wasn’t clear why I felt that way about you, and so you also feeling it wasn’t clear and seeking to clarify is +town for you I think
Idk why I feel like PyP but I guess maybe I do? I don’t think I do though, and I don’t know why that is
I also... just felt like explaining it more than I sometimes would? If I’d been in a different mood I might have done less, if I’d been in a different mood I might have fully towncased the duck and aldus (but prob not because (a) embarrassing if I’m wrong and (b) effort and I’m lazy)
I don’t mean approaching the whole game from a different angle — I mean specifically approaching that from a different angle, inherent to the differences in the two of us as players