In post 222, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Datsi
can you talk about this read a bit more?
You seem willing to communicate and are trying to figure people out, rather than acting like you already know.In post 225, Datisi wrote:In post 222, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Datsi
can you talk about this read a bit more?
1) says NPOW is mislynchbait. Last game his wagon was all town-motivated. Icon is pushing him now. Therefore Icon is scum. How does this work exactly?In post 109, VP Baltar wrote:The point is NPOM is an easy target for a misyeet. In the game I referenced, my scum team was more careful and let the NPOM misyeet happen without having to participate much (iirc, one scum member quick hammered). The particulars from any game to game are going to differ. How is that confusing for you?In post 105, Snowblaze wrote:Am I missing something here, or does that not make much sense? Why do you think Iconeum's scumread on NPOM is scum-motivated?
I think it's scum motivated because it's unlikely scum is going to come out both barrels in RVS the way NPOM did. Scum are timid little babies, afraid to attract attention to themselves early on in the game. I'm saying Icon goofed by thinking "oh, here is an easy push I can hop on to look like I'm scumhunting."
HOW THE FUCK IS THAT AI INDICATIVE AND NOT A PERSONALITY TRAITIn post 224, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Ico is being way to much of a literalist and not looking at intent and subtelty. This doesn't seem townish to me.
Part of what ur accusing me of is not taking perspective and motivation into account. Ur wrong. It's exactly why his read is so bad. Because from his pov and in his experience, my push on you comes from town and not scum. But he scumreads me for it nontheless.In post 231, NoPowerOverMe wrote:1) I'm assuming he's guessing that you are smart enough to sense mislynch bait and you think I am it, and that eliminating me would lead to a similar result as the last time I was day 1 eliminated for little or no reason. He's not wrong, as you are holding on to your assumptions way to strenuously.
maybe i was wrong in defending him that early, but i still found it odd you ended up scumreading him despite him looking townieIn post 231, NoPowerOverMe wrote:3) I think a lot of people think that you started defending GB too quickly. All I did was ask a few ice breaker questions and you decided I was trying to eliminate him.
This has won me my best games, as town. Even very recently.In post 231, NoPowerOverMe wrote:you are holding on to your opinions to tightly even in the face of opposition, and even when there is good/logical reasoning against them
Look at this from HIS pov. He literally said that in that particular game, you got mislynched easily. And that scum had to do nothing for it. Everyone pushing you in that game was TOWN.In post 231, NoPowerOverMe wrote:1) I'm assuming he's guessing that you are smart enough to sense mislynch bait and you think I am it, and that eliminating me would lead to a similar result as the last time I was day 1 eliminated for little or no reason. He's not wrong, as you are holding on to your assumptions way to strenuously.
I actually explained this already. I think it was snowblaze who asked me?In post 236, Iconeum wrote:Look at this from HIS pov. He literally said that in that particular game, you got mislynched easily. And that scum had to do nothing for it. Everyone pushing you in that game was TOWN.In post 231, NoPowerOverMe wrote:1) I'm assuming he's guessing that you are smart enough to sense mislynch bait and you think I am it, and that eliminating me would lead to a similar result as the last time I was day 1 eliminated for little or no reason. He's not wrong, as you are holding on to your assumptions way to strenuously.
How does that make him scumread me for doing that, in this game? Where is the logic from his pov?
Tell me more. I'm also interested in this.In post 186, Testarossa wrote:VOTE: Billy Pilgrim
Not really away from NPOM, but I feel it's locking too much into NPOM/Icon and I don't really like Billy's posts or what he isn't doing atm.
i was TRing you for the GB townread thing & you're not wrong but this comes across as someone frustrated that they're not getting the credit for trying to take a controlling part in the gameIn post 182, Iconeum wrote:how are you coming to a scum!Icon conclusion when i'm standing in front of everyone, clearly not afraid to speak out and DEFINITELY not afraid of drawing attention?
when you just say scum are likely NOT to do this?
yea. like what do u think about themIn post 187, Testarossa wrote:Huh ok, suddenly so many Icon posts lol
not a bad take. I think scum likes to take an active role in controlling the outcome of situations like this but stick to the immediate sidelines. see: andres, snowblaze.In post 189, Iconeum wrote:and in case this is all a big ol' town brawl going on, this is scumIn post 126, Andresvmb wrote:I find myself hard agreeing with most of what VP Baltar has already explained regarding Iconeum’s push on NPOM, which I thought was too much on what seemed to me as mildly defensive. So I’m going to place VP Baltar as a Town Lean, though I’ll admit that he certainly sounds like he’s been around, so could be fooling me with the tone.
sorry
badIn post 228, Iconeum wrote:3) accuses me of hopping on an easy wagon, while it's the opposite of what I did. I defended someone I thought was town. If I wanted to go for the easy wagon, I'd have voted GB (unless you think the team is exactly Ico + GB lol). So how does that work?
i'll consider itIn post 240, VP Baltar wrote:Let's get some more votes on Icon pls. Hellbrooks, testarossa, we got a live one over here.
Oh wow, this is a completely different wave length from me. Interesting, interesting.In post 243, hellbooks wrote:scum vibes from testarossa too. no i will not be explaining at this time
short answer: yes.In post 245, Snowblaze wrote:@hellbooks: what’s your current read on me? You’ve mentioned not finding my earlier post towny and my doing something scum are likely to do - does this imply you think I’m scum?